State-Business Relations and Investment in Egypt

Abla Abdel-Latif, Hubert Schmitz
{"title":"State-Business Relations and Investment in Egypt","authors":"Abla Abdel-Latif,&nbsp;Hubert Schmitz","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0217.2009.00061_2.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Summary</b> </p><p>This study shows that informal relationships between key policymakers and investors have played an important role in raising levels of investment and fostering economic growth. Comparative observations show that common social roots and common professional background facilitate the emergence of an effective public-private growth alliance but the only necessary conditions are common interest and common understanding of the problems to be solved.</p><p>The comparative research on two old and two new sectors shows in detail how informal relationships have emerged and how they have made an impact but it warns against overstating their investment-enhancing role. Effective relationships between policymakers and investors – abbreviated to CIPI – are not the direct cause of increases in investment but can play a critical role in unleashing the profit potential of specific sectors. Research on the food industry shows how CIPI helped to overcome supply constraints and political obstacles in decision-making. Research on the communications industry shows how CIPI helped Egypt to overcome initial barriers to entry and establish a new industry virtually from scratch. While the gains were sometimes appropriated by a few actors, the research shows that exclusive relationships can have inclusive effects, depending on how the private sector is organised.</p><p>Quantitative examination of whether CIPI had an enduring investment-enhancing effect was inconclusive. There is no doubt however that the CIPI was an effective transitional arrangement. It helped investors to overcome barriers to economic growth, it helped policymakers to overcome deficiencies in their own government agencies and it helped both sides to work together in establishing new sector-specific rules and improving the general regulatory framework. The general lesson from this research is that such transitional arrangements deserve more attention, both to gain a better understanding of the political economy of investment and growth and to make research more relevant for policy.</p><p>JEL classification: P16, 010.</p>","PeriodicalId":100617,"journal":{"name":"IDS Research Reports","volume":"2009 61","pages":"1-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0217.2009.00061_2.x","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0217.2009.00061_2.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Summary

This study shows that informal relationships between key policymakers and investors have played an important role in raising levels of investment and fostering economic growth. Comparative observations show that common social roots and common professional background facilitate the emergence of an effective public-private growth alliance but the only necessary conditions are common interest and common understanding of the problems to be solved.

The comparative research on two old and two new sectors shows in detail how informal relationships have emerged and how they have made an impact but it warns against overstating their investment-enhancing role. Effective relationships between policymakers and investors – abbreviated to CIPI – are not the direct cause of increases in investment but can play a critical role in unleashing the profit potential of specific sectors. Research on the food industry shows how CIPI helped to overcome supply constraints and political obstacles in decision-making. Research on the communications industry shows how CIPI helped Egypt to overcome initial barriers to entry and establish a new industry virtually from scratch. While the gains were sometimes appropriated by a few actors, the research shows that exclusive relationships can have inclusive effects, depending on how the private sector is organised.

Quantitative examination of whether CIPI had an enduring investment-enhancing effect was inconclusive. There is no doubt however that the CIPI was an effective transitional arrangement. It helped investors to overcome barriers to economic growth, it helped policymakers to overcome deficiencies in their own government agencies and it helped both sides to work together in establishing new sector-specific rules and improving the general regulatory framework. The general lesson from this research is that such transitional arrangements deserve more attention, both to gain a better understanding of the political economy of investment and growth and to make research more relevant for policy.

JEL classification: P16, 010.

埃及的国家-商业关系和投资
本研究表明,决策者与投资者之间的非正式关系在提高投资水平和促进经济增长方面发挥了重要作用。比较观察表明,共同的社会根源和共同的专业背景促进了有效的公私增长联盟的出现,但唯一的必要条件是共同的利益和对所要解决问题的共同理解。这项对两个新老行业的比较研究详细展示了非正式关系是如何产生的,以及它们是如何产生影响的,但它警告称,不要夸大非正式关系促进投资的作用。政策制定者与投资者之间的有效关系(简称CIPI)并非投资增加的直接原因,但在释放特定行业的利润潜力方面可以发挥关键作用。对食品行业的研究表明,CIPI如何帮助克服供应限制和决策中的政治障碍。对通信行业的研究表明,CIPI如何帮助埃及克服最初的进入壁垒,几乎从零开始建立一个新的行业。虽然收益有时被少数行为者占有,但研究表明,排他性关系可以产生包容性影响,这取决于私营部门的组织方式。对CIPI是否具有持久的投资促进作用的定量检验尚无定论。但毫无疑问,CIPI是一项有效的过渡安排。它帮助投资者克服了经济增长的障碍,帮助政策制定者克服了各自政府机构的缺陷,并帮助双方共同努力,建立新的特定部门规则,改善总体监管框架。这项研究的一般教训是,这种过渡性安排值得更多的关注,既可以更好地理解投资和增长的政治经济学,也可以使研究与政策更相关。JEL分类:P16, 010。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信