A Bibliometric Analysis Performance Assessment of Science Education on Science Process Skill

Path of Science Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.22178/pos.93-4

S. Sudirman, A. Ramdani, A. Doyan, Y. Anwar, J. Rokhmat, Sukarso Sukarso

{"title":"A Bibliometric Analysis Performance Assessment of Science Education on Science Process Skill","authors":"S. Sudirman, A. Ramdani, A. Doyan, Y. Anwar, J. Rokhmat, Sukarso Sukarso","doi":"10.22178/pos.93-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study aims to determine a comprehensive performance assessment of science education using peer assessment and self-assessment to measure scientific process skills. The method of writing article through a literature review that was published from 2010 to 2022, descriptive qualitative and bibliometric analysis was used by the Perish 8 and VOS Viewer software, from 1000 articles sourced from journals, books, conferences, proceedings, and other literature that have been screened on Google Scholar and Scopus databases by the Publish and Perish 8 software. Found 340 articles sourced from journals and only 127 articles indexed by Scopus, consisting of 64 articles on Q1, 47 articles on Q2, 12 Articles on Q3 and four articles on Q4 to be used as references for further analysis as a literature review to write this article. The results of the bibliometric study qualitatively found that a comprehensive assessment of performance on science process skills can be assessed through peer assessment and self-assessment. Further analysis with the VOS Viewer application found a relationship between peer assessment and self-assessment of student science process skills.","PeriodicalId":19980,"journal":{"name":"Path of Science","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Path of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.93-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This study aims to determine a comprehensive performance assessment of science education using peer assessment and self-assessment to measure scientific process skills. The method of writing article through a literature review that was published from 2010 to 2022, descriptive qualitative and bibliometric analysis was used by the Perish 8 and VOS Viewer software, from 1000 articles sourced from journals, books, conferences, proceedings, and other literature that have been screened on Google Scholar and Scopus databases by the Publish and Perish 8 software. Found 340 articles sourced from journals and only 127 articles indexed by Scopus, consisting of 64 articles on Q1, 47 articles on Q2, 12 Articles on Q3 and four articles on Q4 to be used as references for further analysis as a literature review to write this article. The results of the bibliometric study qualitatively found that a comprehensive assessment of performance on science process skills can be assessed through peer assessment and self-assessment. Further analysis with the VOS Viewer application found a relationship between peer assessment and self-assessment of student science process skills.

查看原文本刊更多论文

科学过程技能教育的文献计量学分析绩效评价

．本研究旨在以同伴评鉴与自我评鉴相结合的方式，建立科学教育的综合绩效评鉴。通过2010年至2022年发表的文献综述、描述性定性分析和文献计量学分析的写作方法由灭亡8和VOS Viewer软件使用，从1000篇来自期刊、书籍、会议、论文集和其他文献的文章中，通过出版和灭亡8软件在Google Scholar和Scopus数据库上筛选。找到340篇来自期刊的文章，被Scopus检索的只有127篇，其中Q1 64篇，Q2 47篇，Q3 12篇，Q4 4篇，作为进一步分析的参考文献，作为文献综述来撰写本文。文献计量学研究的结果定性地发现，科学过程技能绩效的综合评估可以通过同行评估和自我评估来评估。通过VOS Viewer应用程序的进一步分析，发现同侪评估与学生科学过程技能的自我评估之间存在关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Path of Science

自引率

0.00%

发文量