Sensory based interventions by speech language pathologists

Marinda Raubenheimer, Salome Geertsema, M. le Roux, M. Graham
{"title":"Sensory based interventions by speech language pathologists","authors":"Marinda Raubenheimer, Salome Geertsema, M. le Roux, M. Graham","doi":"10.3233/acs-220004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The use of sensory based interventions (SBI) by many parties including speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are evident despite limited proof of their efficacy. Insight into SLPs’ implementation, knowledge, and perceptions of SBI are crucial to define and guide such practices in the field of speech-language therapy. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to gather information regarding the nature of SBI, knowledge of sensory processing and SBI, and perception of the role and outcomes of SBI as implemented by SLPs. METHOD: A quantitative survey design was employed. Sixty-five SLPs working in early intervention clinics, public hospital clinics, school settings, and private practice responded to a questionnaire. Results were analysed using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: Respondents indicated that they often implement SBI using various sensory activities and equipment. They answered more than half of the questions related to the prevalence and nature of sensory difficulties in children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (CWASD) accurately. Respondents answered fewer questions regarding the differences between SBI and sensory integration therapy accurately. Regular collaboration with and guidance from occupational therapists (OTs) were reported. Respondents acknowledged the role of SLPs in addressing sensory difficulties in CWASD. Positive outcomes for the implementation of SBI in speech-language therapy were stated. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited evidence for the efficacy of SBI, SLPs regularly implement such practices to enhance therapy outcomes. The insights gathered from this study support reports of positive outcomes related to SBI. The need for more rigorous efficacy studies, clearer guidelines and specialised training for SLT’s in SBI are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":93726,"journal":{"name":"Advances in communication and swallowing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in communication and swallowing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/acs-220004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of sensory based interventions (SBI) by many parties including speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are evident despite limited proof of their efficacy. Insight into SLPs’ implementation, knowledge, and perceptions of SBI are crucial to define and guide such practices in the field of speech-language therapy. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to gather information regarding the nature of SBI, knowledge of sensory processing and SBI, and perception of the role and outcomes of SBI as implemented by SLPs. METHOD: A quantitative survey design was employed. Sixty-five SLPs working in early intervention clinics, public hospital clinics, school settings, and private practice responded to a questionnaire. Results were analysed using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: Respondents indicated that they often implement SBI using various sensory activities and equipment. They answered more than half of the questions related to the prevalence and nature of sensory difficulties in children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (CWASD) accurately. Respondents answered fewer questions regarding the differences between SBI and sensory integration therapy accurately. Regular collaboration with and guidance from occupational therapists (OTs) were reported. Respondents acknowledged the role of SLPs in addressing sensory difficulties in CWASD. Positive outcomes for the implementation of SBI in speech-language therapy were stated. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited evidence for the efficacy of SBI, SLPs regularly implement such practices to enhance therapy outcomes. The insights gathered from this study support reports of positive outcomes related to SBI. The need for more rigorous efficacy studies, clearer guidelines and specialised training for SLT’s in SBI are highlighted.
语言病理学家基于感觉的干预
背景:包括语言病理学家(slp)在内的许多方面使用基于感觉的干预(SBI)是显而易见的,尽管其有效性的证据有限。洞察slp的实施、知识和对SBI的认知对于定义和指导言语治疗领域的此类实践至关重要。目的:本研究旨在收集有关SBI的性质、感觉加工和SBI的知识,以及slp实施SBI的作用和结果的感知信息。方法:采用定量调查设计。65名在早期干预诊所、公立医院诊所、学校和私人诊所工作的slp回答了一份问卷。采用SPSS统计软件对结果进行分析。结果:受访者表示,他们经常使用各种感官活动和设备实施SBI。他们准确地回答了一半以上与自闭症谱系障碍(CWASD)儿童感觉困难的普遍性和性质有关的问题。对于SBI和感觉统合治疗的差异,被调查者准确回答的问题较少。报告了与职业治疗师的定期合作和指导。被访者承认,残障人士在解决残疾儿童的感官困难方面发挥了重要作用。在言语语言治疗中实施SBI的积极结果被陈述。结论:尽管SBI疗效的证据有限,但slp定期实施这种做法以提高治疗效果。从这项研究中收集到的见解支持了与SBI相关的积极结果的报告。强调需要更严格的疗效研究,更明确的指导方针和SBI中SLT的专门培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信