How does it feel to be evaluated? A systemic look at postgraduate students

D. Carvalho, M. Ranal, C. Mendes-Rodrigues
{"title":"How does it feel to be evaluated? A systemic look at postgraduate students","authors":"D. Carvalho, M. Ranal, C. Mendes-Rodrigues","doi":"10.5430/IJH.V5N2P49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The structural constellation, applicable to education, was used to test the hypothesis that postgraduate students do not have difficulties to be evaluated. To test this hypothesis, the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire (World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument abbreviated) was applied to 36 students of the Postgraduate Program in Agronomy of the Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, on the first and last days of the school semester of 2017. Half of these students spontaneously accepted to participate in the constellation and responded to two systemic questionnaires, one at the beginning and the other at the end of the semester. During the first month of classes, the 18 students were submitted to the nine squares of the structural constellation technique. At the beginning of the semester, the two groups presented the same quality of life profile. After the constellation, the desire of the 18 students to increase their comfort during the assessments was achieved. In addition, the constellation improved the quality of life of the treated group, regarding the psychological and the environment domains. Another important aspect was the positive correlation between the desire of greater comfort during the assessments and the social domain, before the constellation, and with the psychological domain after the constellation. Knowing that the two groups were initially equal and that the quality of life was improved for the group that participated in the constellation, we hope that this type of therapy can help students to look at the evaluation process with more self-confidence and tranquility, which may improve their academic performance.","PeriodicalId":73454,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/IJH.V5N2P49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The structural constellation, applicable to education, was used to test the hypothesis that postgraduate students do not have difficulties to be evaluated. To test this hypothesis, the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire (World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument abbreviated) was applied to 36 students of the Postgraduate Program in Agronomy of the Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, on the first and last days of the school semester of 2017. Half of these students spontaneously accepted to participate in the constellation and responded to two systemic questionnaires, one at the beginning and the other at the end of the semester. During the first month of classes, the 18 students were submitted to the nine squares of the structural constellation technique. At the beginning of the semester, the two groups presented the same quality of life profile. After the constellation, the desire of the 18 students to increase their comfort during the assessments was achieved. In addition, the constellation improved the quality of life of the treated group, regarding the psychological and the environment domains. Another important aspect was the positive correlation between the desire of greater comfort during the assessments and the social domain, before the constellation, and with the psychological domain after the constellation. Knowing that the two groups were initially equal and that the quality of life was improved for the group that participated in the constellation, we hope that this type of therapy can help students to look at the evaluation process with more self-confidence and tranquility, which may improve their academic performance.
被评估的感觉如何?对研究生进行系统的考察
本文采用教育领域的结构星座来检验研究生不存在评价困难的假设。为了验证这一假设,在2017年学期的第一天和最后几天,对印度联邦大学农学研究生课程的36名学生应用了WHOQOL-BREF问卷(世界卫生组织生活质量量表简称)。这些学生中有一半自发地接受参与星座,并回答了两份系统的问卷,一份在学期开始时,另一份在学期结束时。在第一个月的课程中,18名学生被提交到结构星座技术的九个正方形。在学期开始时,两组的生活质量概况相同。在星座之后,18名学生在评估过程中增加舒适度的愿望得到了实现。此外,在心理和环境方面,星座改善了治疗组的生活质量。另一个重要的方面是,在评估过程中,对更舒适的渴望与星座前的社会领域,以及星座后的心理领域之间存在正相关。我们知道两组最初是平等的,并且参与星座的那一组的生活质量得到了改善,我们希望这种治疗可以帮助学生更加自信和平静地看待评估过程,从而提高他们的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信