{"title":"Abortion, moral maturity and civic journalism.","authors":"M. Patterson, M. Hall","doi":"10.1080/15295039809367037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public rhetoric on abortion and the journalistic coverage of it has matured in tone and content over the years since women's magazines first broke a long public silence on the issue in the 1940s. Since the 1970s, extremist views on abortion have dominated the press. But new common ground arguments represent an emergence of the feminine ethical response of care and responsibility into the foreground of public discourse where it is tempering the long‐dominant language of individual rights with relational concern for others. This article proceeds from a women's voice/experience perspective on feminism and applies a narrative method of rhetorical analysis to the coverage of abortion in American popular media from the 1940s to the 1990s. This analysis is used: (1) to establish that the feminine means of moral reasoning, i.e., the ethic of care (Gilligan, 1982) that is generally relegated to the private sphere, has emerged gradually into the foreground of American public discourse on abortion; (2) to trace a gr...","PeriodicalId":81031,"journal":{"name":"Critical studies in mass communication : CSMC : a publication of the Speech Communication Association","volume":"29 1","pages":"91-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical studies in mass communication : CSMC : a publication of the Speech Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039809367037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Public rhetoric on abortion and the journalistic coverage of it has matured in tone and content over the years since women's magazines first broke a long public silence on the issue in the 1940s. Since the 1970s, extremist views on abortion have dominated the press. But new common ground arguments represent an emergence of the feminine ethical response of care and responsibility into the foreground of public discourse where it is tempering the long‐dominant language of individual rights with relational concern for others. This article proceeds from a women's voice/experience perspective on feminism and applies a narrative method of rhetorical analysis to the coverage of abortion in American popular media from the 1940s to the 1990s. This analysis is used: (1) to establish that the feminine means of moral reasoning, i.e., the ethic of care (Gilligan, 1982) that is generally relegated to the private sphere, has emerged gradually into the foreground of American public discourse on abortion; (2) to trace a gr...