Correlation Between Drilling Parameters and Lithology - The Hidden Geological Information of Drilling Data

Bouchra Lamik-Thonhauser, J. Schoen, C. Koller, A. Arnaout
{"title":"Correlation Between Drilling Parameters and Lithology - The Hidden Geological Information of Drilling Data","authors":"Bouchra Lamik-Thonhauser, J. Schoen, C. Koller, A. Arnaout","doi":"10.2118/192916-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drilling process is fundamentally controlled and influenced by the properties of the penetrated formation. The focus of various studies is directed mainly on the optimal design of drill bit and drilling operations related to the (expected) geological situation of a safe drilling process.\n Out of interest the question \"Is it possible to extract any lithologic information from drilling data?\" also arises.\n The drilling process at the bit represents a complicated rock mechanical process. The drill bit acts as a rotating cutter, controlled mainly by weight on bit (WOB), bit size, number of revolutions per time (RPM), which controls speed of the cutting process. We define a \"cutting force Fc\" as a combination of these parameters and investigate the relationship between Fc and rate of penetration (ROP). For the correlation with lithology of penetrated formations, two methods are applied on test wells:\n – crossplots Fc versus ROP with discrimination for dominant lithology. – histograms of the ratio of two variables for dominant lithology.\n Drilling data from two basins are analyzed (in both cases wells are nearly vertical):\n – Vienna Basin: Dominant lithologies are sandstones (varying degree of cementation), shale/marls, limestones, and dolomites. – Williston Basin: Dominant lithologies in the analysed section are sandstone shale, dolomitic limestone, and limestone with anhydrite.\n Data points from the rocks with similar lithology in the crossplot are situated in a cloud - different rocks show different cloud position. Particularly between clastic (sand, silt, shale) and carbonate (limestone, dolomite) rocks, a clear separation is visible.\n The implementation of lines for a constant ratio Fc/ROP in the crossplot separate the different lithologies. Therefore, the statistical distribution of this ratio S = Fc/ROP for the dominant lithologies was analyzed by histograms. For the two test wells, histograms separate the different lithologies and confirm the information content.\n The drilling process is controlled by rock type; the analyse of drill-process data can be used for a lithological discrimination and especially for detecting changing lithology (boundaries) during drilling process. For two test wells, the discrimination could be demonstrated by the crossplot and histogram technique. The exact position of discriminator magnitudes (center of data clouds in the crossplots, peaks in the histograms) is specific for the considered field and may be controlled by more drilling parameters.","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192916-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Drilling process is fundamentally controlled and influenced by the properties of the penetrated formation. The focus of various studies is directed mainly on the optimal design of drill bit and drilling operations related to the (expected) geological situation of a safe drilling process. Out of interest the question "Is it possible to extract any lithologic information from drilling data?" also arises. The drilling process at the bit represents a complicated rock mechanical process. The drill bit acts as a rotating cutter, controlled mainly by weight on bit (WOB), bit size, number of revolutions per time (RPM), which controls speed of the cutting process. We define a "cutting force Fc" as a combination of these parameters and investigate the relationship between Fc and rate of penetration (ROP). For the correlation with lithology of penetrated formations, two methods are applied on test wells: – crossplots Fc versus ROP with discrimination for dominant lithology. – histograms of the ratio of two variables for dominant lithology. Drilling data from two basins are analyzed (in both cases wells are nearly vertical): – Vienna Basin: Dominant lithologies are sandstones (varying degree of cementation), shale/marls, limestones, and dolomites. – Williston Basin: Dominant lithologies in the analysed section are sandstone shale, dolomitic limestone, and limestone with anhydrite. Data points from the rocks with similar lithology in the crossplot are situated in a cloud - different rocks show different cloud position. Particularly between clastic (sand, silt, shale) and carbonate (limestone, dolomite) rocks, a clear separation is visible. The implementation of lines for a constant ratio Fc/ROP in the crossplot separate the different lithologies. Therefore, the statistical distribution of this ratio S = Fc/ROP for the dominant lithologies was analyzed by histograms. For the two test wells, histograms separate the different lithologies and confirm the information content. The drilling process is controlled by rock type; the analyse of drill-process data can be used for a lithological discrimination and especially for detecting changing lithology (boundaries) during drilling process. For two test wells, the discrimination could be demonstrated by the crossplot and histogram technique. The exact position of discriminator magnitudes (center of data clouds in the crossplots, peaks in the histograms) is specific for the considered field and may be controlled by more drilling parameters.
钻井参数与岩性的相关性——钻井数据中隐藏的地质信息
钻井过程从根本上受所钻地层性质的控制和影响。各种研究的重点主要集中在钻头的优化设计和与(预期的)地质情况有关的钻井作业上,以保证钻井过程的安全。出于兴趣,“是否有可能从钻井数据中提取任何岩性信息?”钻头的钻进过程是一个复杂的岩石力学过程。钻头作为一个旋转切削齿,主要由钻压(WOB)、钻头尺寸、每次转数(RPM)控制,从而控制切削过程的速度。我们将“切削力Fc”定义为这些参数的组合,并研究了Fc与钻速(ROP)之间的关系。为了与已穿透地层岩性进行对比,在测试井中采用了两种方法:Fc - ROP交叉图,并对优势岩性进行了区分。-优势岩性的两个变量之比的直方图。维也纳盆地:主要岩性为砂岩(胶结程度不同)、页岩/泥灰岩、灰岩和白云岩。威利斯顿盆地:分析剖面的主要岩性为砂岩页岩、白云岩灰岩和硬石膏灰岩。交叉图中岩性相似的岩石数据点位于一个云中,不同的岩石显示不同的云位置。特别是在碎屑(砂、粉、页岩)和碳酸盐(石灰岩、白云岩)岩石之间,明显的分离是可见的。在交叉图中实现恒定比率的Fc/ROP线将不同的岩性分开。因此,通过直方图分析优势岩性S = Fc/ROP的统计分布。对于两口测试井,直方图区分了不同的岩性,并确认了信息内容。钻井过程受岩石类型控制;钻井过程数据分析可用于岩性判别,特别是用于探测钻井过程中变化的岩性(边界)。对于两个测试井,可以用交叉图和直方图技术来证明这种区别。鉴别器震级的确切位置(交叉图中数据云的中心,直方图中的峰值)是特定于所考虑的油田的,可能受到更多钻井参数的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信