THE PHENOMENON OF LIFE

Christopher Alexander
{"title":"THE PHENOMENON OF LIFE","authors":"Christopher Alexander","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv27ftw8d.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout his Marburg and Freiburg lecture courses of the 1920s, as in his magnum opus Being and Time (1927), Heidegger never ceased to emphasize the central importance of the phenomenon of world—a phenomenon that, he claimed, had never been adequately appreciated or understood in the history of philosophy, if indeed it had been seen at all.1 As Hannah Arendt astutely noted, Heidegger’s concept of world “in many respects stands at the center of his philosophy.”2 While Being and Time emphasized world as a referential totality of signification, enabling the disclosure of meanings that first “found the possible Being of word and language” (SZ, 87), and as a phenomenon to which Dasein was always already exposed in advance, that to which Dasein could only inevitably return in whatever degree of explicitness (76), it also highlighted the fundamental attunement of Angst as that which “first discloses world as world” (187). The “peculiar temporality” of Angst “holds” Dasein in the presence of its ownmost thrownness, yet in such a way as to hold the moment or Augenblick of possible decision “at the ready” (344). Such being held, the present study will argue, enables the distinctive phenomenon of human athos. For in disclosing Dasein in its “being toward” its ownmost possibility for Being, the temporality of Angst thereby first opens Dasein to the possibility of coming toward itself within and from out of its","PeriodicalId":22996,"journal":{"name":"The Nature of Order, Book 1: The Phenomenon of Life","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nature of Order, Book 1: The Phenomenon of Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27ftw8d.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

Throughout his Marburg and Freiburg lecture courses of the 1920s, as in his magnum opus Being and Time (1927), Heidegger never ceased to emphasize the central importance of the phenomenon of world—a phenomenon that, he claimed, had never been adequately appreciated or understood in the history of philosophy, if indeed it had been seen at all.1 As Hannah Arendt astutely noted, Heidegger’s concept of world “in many respects stands at the center of his philosophy.”2 While Being and Time emphasized world as a referential totality of signification, enabling the disclosure of meanings that first “found the possible Being of word and language” (SZ, 87), and as a phenomenon to which Dasein was always already exposed in advance, that to which Dasein could only inevitably return in whatever degree of explicitness (76), it also highlighted the fundamental attunement of Angst as that which “first discloses world as world” (187). The “peculiar temporality” of Angst “holds” Dasein in the presence of its ownmost thrownness, yet in such a way as to hold the moment or Augenblick of possible decision “at the ready” (344). Such being held, the present study will argue, enables the distinctive phenomenon of human athos. For in disclosing Dasein in its “being toward” its ownmost possibility for Being, the temporality of Angst thereby first opens Dasein to the possibility of coming toward itself within and from out of its
生命现象
在20世纪20年代的马尔堡和弗莱堡讲座中,就像在他的巨著《存在与时间》(1927)中一样,海德格尔从未停止强调世界现象的中心重要性——他声称,在哲学史上,如果确实有人看到过世界现象的话,也从未得到充分的欣赏或理解正如汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)敏锐地指出的那样,海德格尔的世界概念“在许多方面都是他哲学的中心。2《存在与时间》将世界强调为意义的指称总体,使意义的揭示能够首先“发现文字和语言的可能的存在”(SZ, 87),将世界强调为一种现象,而在此之前,此在总是被预先暴露出来,无论其明确程度如何,此在都只能不可避免地回归(76),它还强调了焦虑的基本调和,即“首先将世界作为世界揭示出来”(187)。焦虑的“特殊的时间性”将此在“保持”在它自己的最短暂的存在中,然而以这样一种方式保持可能决定的时刻或奥根布利克“准备好了”(344)。本研究将论证,这样的观点使人类的悲哀成为可能。因为在向存在的最可能的存在揭示此在的“存在”时,焦虑的时间性首先打开了此在向它的内在和从它的外在走向它自己的可能性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信