{"title":"Effectiveness of modified arthroscopic treatment of patients with epicondylitis of the humerus","authors":"A. Midaev, M. Salihov, N. Fomin","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-235-243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background One of the most common reasons of patients’ visits with complaints in the area of the elbow joint is epicondylitis of the elbow joint. Surgical treatment is recommended if conservative treatment fails after 6-12 months. Arthroscopy of the elbow joint is one of the current surgical methods of minimally invasive interventions on the elbow joint. Purpose To conduct a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of treating epicondylitis of the elbow joint using modified arthroscopic and open techniques Methods A prospective cohort-controlled study was performed on 120 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – patients operated on by the open method (control), group 2 – patients operated on by the arthroscopic method. Additionally, depending on the nosology, the patients were divided into four subgroups. Functional results were assessed using VAS, DASH, MEPS; additionally, dynamometry was performed before surgery, and 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Results There is a significant improvement in the function of the elbow joint one month after surgical treatment, mainly in III and IV subgroups according to the MEPS scale, p = 0.0001. According to the VAS scale, a pronounced and persistent decrease in pain in the long-term period compared with the preoperative period was revealed in patients of the arthroscopic subgroup p = 0.0001. According to the DASH questionnaire, the functional results in patients of arthroscopic group in the postoperative period significantly exceeded over the open method p < 0.001. Discussion The use of the open surgical method provides good or excellent functional outcomes of treatment in 75-85 %. However, it has a number of disadvantages, including infectious complications and the inability of the surgeon to identify and completely remove the pathological altered tissues. The arthroscopic technique allows leveling these shortcomings and obtaining up to 95‑100 % excellent functional results. Conclusion Based on the data obtained in this study, the reatment of patients with epicondylitis of the distal humerus according to the developed arthroscopic technique significantly improves the functional state of patients, which, in turn, improves their quality of life.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-235-243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background One of the most common reasons of patients’ visits with complaints in the area of the elbow joint is epicondylitis of the elbow joint. Surgical treatment is recommended if conservative treatment fails after 6-12 months. Arthroscopy of the elbow joint is one of the current surgical methods of minimally invasive interventions on the elbow joint. Purpose To conduct a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of treating epicondylitis of the elbow joint using modified arthroscopic and open techniques Methods A prospective cohort-controlled study was performed on 120 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – patients operated on by the open method (control), group 2 – patients operated on by the arthroscopic method. Additionally, depending on the nosology, the patients were divided into four subgroups. Functional results were assessed using VAS, DASH, MEPS; additionally, dynamometry was performed before surgery, and 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Results There is a significant improvement in the function of the elbow joint one month after surgical treatment, mainly in III and IV subgroups according to the MEPS scale, p = 0.0001. According to the VAS scale, a pronounced and persistent decrease in pain in the long-term period compared with the preoperative period was revealed in patients of the arthroscopic subgroup p = 0.0001. According to the DASH questionnaire, the functional results in patients of arthroscopic group in the postoperative period significantly exceeded over the open method p < 0.001. Discussion The use of the open surgical method provides good or excellent functional outcomes of treatment in 75-85 %. However, it has a number of disadvantages, including infectious complications and the inability of the surgeon to identify and completely remove the pathological altered tissues. The arthroscopic technique allows leveling these shortcomings and obtaining up to 95‑100 % excellent functional results. Conclusion Based on the data obtained in this study, the reatment of patients with epicondylitis of the distal humerus according to the developed arthroscopic technique significantly improves the functional state of patients, which, in turn, improves their quality of life.
期刊介绍:
Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems