Zenitism and orientalism

I. Glišić, Tijana Vujosevic
{"title":"Zenitism and orientalism","authors":"I. Glišić, Tijana Vujosevic","doi":"10.5937/zbaku2109029g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reflecting on the centenary of the birth of Zenitism, this essay examines how the movement engaged with stereotypes about the Slavic Orient, and in particular the discourse on Balkanism. The European orientalist reading of the Balkans became especially profound in years surrounding the World War I. Seeking to invert derogatory characterisations of the Balkan Peninsula, Zenitists would embark on a mission to \"Balkanise Europe\" by presenting the artist from the East as a rejuvenating, revolutionary force emerging from a cultural tabula rasa. Zenitism sought to destabilise the dominant Orient-Occident discourse by establishing parallels between existing negative stereotypes of the Balkans and the aesthetic tropes of the European avantgarde. Specifically, Zenitists established the Balkan \"Barbarogenius\" as the archetypal modernist primitive - precisely the figure conjured by the European intelligentsia as the saviour for its listless modern condition. In addition, the Zenitist movement established an analogy between the hallmark fragmentation of the Balkans and the cultural cacophony of the avant-garde. The political and aesthetic strategies of the movement, the authors assert, bear a striking similarity with those of the Black Atlantic, and its 'in-betweenness'-its ambition to straddle two opposing worlds. Organised around its eponymous journal Zenit, which was conceptualised as \"the first Balkan journal in Europe and the first European journal in the Balkans,\" Zenitism employed European avant-garde aesthetic strategies while simultaneously rejecting European claims to cultural supremacy. For Yugoslav, Soviet, and Western European audiences, the journal had two parallel goals: the creative \"Balkanisation\" of Europe, and a commitment to dismantling Yugoslav \"nesting orientalisms\" by fighting against the reproduction of negative stereotypes among the region's own inhabitants. Against a backdrop of European crisis and a global demand for a renewed emancipatory struggle, the ambition of Zenitism holds strong appeal today.","PeriodicalId":31481,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2109029g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reflecting on the centenary of the birth of Zenitism, this essay examines how the movement engaged with stereotypes about the Slavic Orient, and in particular the discourse on Balkanism. The European orientalist reading of the Balkans became especially profound in years surrounding the World War I. Seeking to invert derogatory characterisations of the Balkan Peninsula, Zenitists would embark on a mission to "Balkanise Europe" by presenting the artist from the East as a rejuvenating, revolutionary force emerging from a cultural tabula rasa. Zenitism sought to destabilise the dominant Orient-Occident discourse by establishing parallels between existing negative stereotypes of the Balkans and the aesthetic tropes of the European avantgarde. Specifically, Zenitists established the Balkan "Barbarogenius" as the archetypal modernist primitive - precisely the figure conjured by the European intelligentsia as the saviour for its listless modern condition. In addition, the Zenitist movement established an analogy between the hallmark fragmentation of the Balkans and the cultural cacophony of the avant-garde. The political and aesthetic strategies of the movement, the authors assert, bear a striking similarity with those of the Black Atlantic, and its 'in-betweenness'-its ambition to straddle two opposing worlds. Organised around its eponymous journal Zenit, which was conceptualised as "the first Balkan journal in Europe and the first European journal in the Balkans," Zenitism employed European avant-garde aesthetic strategies while simultaneously rejecting European claims to cultural supremacy. For Yugoslav, Soviet, and Western European audiences, the journal had two parallel goals: the creative "Balkanisation" of Europe, and a commitment to dismantling Yugoslav "nesting orientalisms" by fighting against the reproduction of negative stereotypes among the region's own inhabitants. Against a backdrop of European crisis and a global demand for a renewed emancipatory struggle, the ambition of Zenitism holds strong appeal today.
天顶主义和东方主义
反思Zenitism诞生一百周年,本文考察了该运动如何与关于斯拉夫东方的刻板印象,特别是关于巴尔干主义的话语。欧洲东方主义者对巴尔干半岛的解读在第一次世界大战前后变得尤为深刻。为了扭转巴尔干半岛的贬损特征,Zenitists将开始一项“巴尔干化欧洲”的使命,将来自东方的艺术家呈现为一股从文化舞台上崛起的复兴革命力量。天顶主义试图通过建立巴尔干半岛现有的负面刻板印象和欧洲先锋派的美学修辞之间的相似之处,来破坏主导的东西方话语的稳定。具体地说,天顶主义者将巴尔干的“野蛮人”确立为现代主义原始人的原型——正是欧洲知识分子把这个人物想象成其萎靡不振的现代状况的救星。此外,天顶主义运动在巴尔干半岛的标志性分裂和先锋派的文化杂音之间建立了类比。作者断言,该运动的政治和美学策略与黑大西洋运动有着惊人的相似之处,以及它的“中间性”——它跨越两个对立世界的野心。Zenitism以其同名杂志《Zenit》为中心组织,该杂志被定义为“欧洲第一本巴尔干期刊和巴尔干地区第一本欧洲期刊”,Zenitism采用欧洲前卫的美学策略,同时拒绝欧洲对文化霸权的主张。对于南斯拉夫、苏联和西欧的读者来说,该杂志有两个平行的目标:创造性地将欧洲“巴尔干化”,以及致力于通过反对在该地区自己的居民中再生产负面刻板印象来拆除南斯拉夫的“筑巢东方主义”。在欧洲危机的背景下,在全球要求重新进行解放斗争的背景下,泽尼特主义的野心在今天具有强烈的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信