Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentine and Duloxetine in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Q4 Medicine
Hussain Ahmad, K. H. Rahman, Mifta Chowdhury, Monharul Islam Bhuiya, Nurjahan Ferdous, Md Abu Nayeem Chowdhury
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentine and Duloxetine in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain","authors":"Hussain Ahmad, K. H. Rahman, Mifta Chowdhury, Monharul Islam Bhuiya, Nurjahan Ferdous, Md Abu Nayeem Chowdhury","doi":"10.3329/medtoday.v33i2.56054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPNP) is not uncommon now a days. As the pathophysiology is not completely understood, symptoms relief is still the main goal of treatment. Gabapentine and Duloxetine are being using around the world for this purpose. But clinical data regarding its efficacy and safety are not sufficiently available.\nMaterials and Methods: This prospective comparative clinical study conducted in Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College and Sylhet Diabetic Hospital, Bangladesh from January 2013 to December 2013. Diagnosis of DPNP confirmed by Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and Douleur Neuropathic en-4 (DN4). Patients were treated by Gabapentine (Group-A) and Duloxetine (Group-B); and followed up at 4th, 8th and 12th week of treatment using 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NRS), clinical global impression of change (CGIC) score and patient’s global impression of change (PGIC) score.\nResults: A total of 72 patients with DPNP were recruited. Final comparison was done in 64 patients – 33 in Group-A and 31 in Group-B. Changes in NRS (p = <0.001), CGIC (p = <0.001) and PGIC (p = <0.001) were statistically significant during the course of treatment. However, inter-group variation of NRS, CGIC and PGIC were not statistically significant at the beginning and 4th, 8th and 12th week of treatment. Insignificant adverse effects were noted between the groups in this study except constipation (p = 0.022) and nausea-vomiting (p = 0.01) of Duloxetine taking group.\nConclusion: Gabapentine and Duloxetine are equally effective in the treatment of DPNP with good safety profile.\nMedicine Today 2021 Vol.33(2): 108-113","PeriodicalId":39348,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Today","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v33i2.56054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPNP) is not uncommon now a days. As the pathophysiology is not completely understood, symptoms relief is still the main goal of treatment. Gabapentine and Duloxetine are being using around the world for this purpose. But clinical data regarding its efficacy and safety are not sufficiently available. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative clinical study conducted in Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College and Sylhet Diabetic Hospital, Bangladesh from January 2013 to December 2013. Diagnosis of DPNP confirmed by Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and Douleur Neuropathic en-4 (DN4). Patients were treated by Gabapentine (Group-A) and Duloxetine (Group-B); and followed up at 4th, 8th and 12th week of treatment using 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NRS), clinical global impression of change (CGIC) score and patient’s global impression of change (PGIC) score. Results: A total of 72 patients with DPNP were recruited. Final comparison was done in 64 patients – 33 in Group-A and 31 in Group-B. Changes in NRS (p = <0.001), CGIC (p = <0.001) and PGIC (p = <0.001) were statistically significant during the course of treatment. However, inter-group variation of NRS, CGIC and PGIC were not statistically significant at the beginning and 4th, 8th and 12th week of treatment. Insignificant adverse effects were noted between the groups in this study except constipation (p = 0.022) and nausea-vomiting (p = 0.01) of Duloxetine taking group. Conclusion: Gabapentine and Duloxetine are equally effective in the treatment of DPNP with good safety profile. Medicine Today 2021 Vol.33(2): 108-113
加巴喷丁和度洛西汀治疗糖尿病周围神经性疼痛的疗效和安全性
导语:糖尿病周围神经病变(DPNP)目前并不罕见。由于病理生理尚不完全清楚,缓解症状仍是治疗的主要目的。加巴喷丁和度洛西汀在世界各地都被用于这一目的。但是关于其有效性和安全性的临床数据并不充分。材料与方法:本前瞻性比较临床研究于2013年1月至2013年12月在孟加拉国Sylhet MAG Osmani医学院和Sylhet糖尿病医院进行。采用密歇根神经病变筛查仪(MNSI)和双神经病变en-4 (DN4)诊断DPNP。加巴喷丁(a组)、度洛西汀(b组)治疗;并于治疗第4、8、12周采用11分数值疼痛评定量表(NRS)、临床总体印象变化(CGIC)评分和患者总体印象变化(PGIC)评分进行随访。结果:共招募了72例DPNP患者。最后对64例患者进行比较,其中a组33例,b组31例。NRS (p = <0.001)、CGIC (p = <0.001)、PGIC (p = <0.001)在治疗过程中变化均有统计学意义。而NRS、CGIC、PGIC在治疗开始及治疗第4、8、12周组间差异均无统计学意义。除服用度洛西汀组便秘(p = 0.022)和恶心呕吐(p = 0.01)外,各组间不良反应均无统计学意义。结论:加巴喷丁与度洛西汀治疗DPNP疗效相当,且安全性较好。医学今日2021卷33(2):108-113
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine Today
Medicine Today Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信