Perceived Access to Water: Associations with Health in Rural Uganda

IF 0.6 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
A. Pearson, Amanda Rzotkiewicz, Judith Namanya
{"title":"Perceived Access to Water: Associations with Health in Rural Uganda","authors":"A. Pearson, Amanda Rzotkiewicz, Judith Namanya","doi":"10.12691/AJRD-5-3-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water security has been associated with myriad health concerns. However, measures of access to water vary and may not reflect reality or user priorities, affecting our understanding of the effect of water security on health. This study aimed to: 1) examine relationships between established measures and perceived access to water; and 2) compare the ability of established measures versus a perceived measure to predict health outcomes. Data collection included baseline anthropometrics, bi-monthly morbidity histories, and a final survey over a four-month period among 100 households in Uganda’s rural, semi-arid savannah. Hierarchical regression models were fitted to test relationships. Despite low water security, 68% of participants did not report illness. Perceptions of better access was significantly associated with fewer minutes walking to source and, surprisingly, with fewer litres collected yesterday/person. Perceived better access (β=-0.09, p<0.10) and more public ownership (β =-0.09, p<0.10) were associated with lower percentage time ill. Both effects were small. Understanding of the drivers of perceived water access may provide useful insights into social dimensions of water security, which may influence health.","PeriodicalId":45379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural and Community Development","volume":"5 1","pages":"55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJRD-5-3-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Water security has been associated with myriad health concerns. However, measures of access to water vary and may not reflect reality or user priorities, affecting our understanding of the effect of water security on health. This study aimed to: 1) examine relationships between established measures and perceived access to water; and 2) compare the ability of established measures versus a perceived measure to predict health outcomes. Data collection included baseline anthropometrics, bi-monthly morbidity histories, and a final survey over a four-month period among 100 households in Uganda’s rural, semi-arid savannah. Hierarchical regression models were fitted to test relationships. Despite low water security, 68% of participants did not report illness. Perceptions of better access was significantly associated with fewer minutes walking to source and, surprisingly, with fewer litres collected yesterday/person. Perceived better access (β=-0.09, p<0.10) and more public ownership (β =-0.09, p<0.10) were associated with lower percentage time ill. Both effects were small. Understanding of the drivers of perceived water access may provide useful insights into social dimensions of water security, which may influence health.
感知获得水的机会:与乌干达农村健康的关系
水安全一直与无数健康问题联系在一起。然而,获取水的措施各不相同,可能无法反映现实或用户的优先事项,从而影响我们对水安全对健康影响的理解。本研究旨在:1)检验既定措施与感知水资源获取之间的关系;2)比较既定措施与感知措施预测健康结果的能力。数据收集包括基线人体测量、双月发病史,以及对乌干达农村半干旱大草原100户家庭进行的为期4个月的最终调查。采用层次回归模型检验关系。尽管水安全水平较低,但68%的参与者没有报告生病。更方便的交通方式与更少的步行时间显著相关,令人惊讶的是,昨天每个人收集的升水也更少。感知到更好的访问(β=-0.09, p<0.10)和更多的公共所有权(β=-0.09, p<0.10)与较低的患病时间百分比相关。这两种影响都很小。了解感知水获取的驱动因素,可以对可能影响健康的水安全的社会层面提供有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信