A PRACTICAL AND ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO THE ALBANIAN MECHANISM FOR VIOLATION OF REASONABLE LENGTH REQUIREMENT IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Q4 Social Sciences
Jonida Rystemaj, Asim Vokshi
{"title":"A PRACTICAL AND ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO THE ALBANIAN MECHANISM FOR VIOLATION OF REASONABLE LENGTH REQUIREMENT IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS","authors":"Jonida Rystemaj, Asim Vokshi","doi":"10.46763/bssr2321045r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Albania, a major constitutional reform took place in 2016 that aimed at strengthening the independence and accountability of the judiciary and had, as its main pillar, the vetting process for judges and prosecutors. Other major interventions were ratified following the constitutional amendments that aimed at securing speedy procedures before the courts. Therefore, amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure were envisaged and introduced a mechanism to give impetus to accelerating the judicial proceedings. This article will mainly address the effectiveness of this instrument and the behavior of the courts towards claims based on that mechanism. This analysis will be conducted in the current setting of the Albanian judiciary which is facing a considerable backlog of cases. Through an analytical approach and examination of jurisprudence, the authors suggest that this mechanism is designed to work in a normal situation where courts are adequately equipped with human resources, both judges and aiding staff.","PeriodicalId":36799,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Social Science Review","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr2321045r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Albania, a major constitutional reform took place in 2016 that aimed at strengthening the independence and accountability of the judiciary and had, as its main pillar, the vetting process for judges and prosecutors. Other major interventions were ratified following the constitutional amendments that aimed at securing speedy procedures before the courts. Therefore, amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure were envisaged and introduced a mechanism to give impetus to accelerating the judicial proceedings. This article will mainly address the effectiveness of this instrument and the behavior of the courts towards claims based on that mechanism. This analysis will be conducted in the current setting of the Albanian judiciary which is facing a considerable backlog of cases. Through an analytical approach and examination of jurisprudence, the authors suggest that this mechanism is designed to work in a normal situation where courts are adequately equipped with human resources, both judges and aiding staff.
对阿尔巴尼亚在司法程序中违反合理篇幅要求的机制的实际和分析方法
阿尔巴尼亚于2016年进行了一项重大宪法改革,旨在加强司法机构的独立性和问责制,并将法官和检察官的审查程序作为其主要支柱。其他主要的干预措施是在宪法修正案之后批准的,这些修正案旨在确保在法庭上迅速进行程序。因此,设想了对《民事诉讼法》的修正,并引入了一种机制,以推动加快司法程序。本文将主要讨论这一文书的有效性以及法院对基于该机制的索赔的行为。这项分析将在阿尔巴尼亚司法机构目前的情况下进行,该机构面临大量积压的案件。通过分析方法和对法理学的考察,作者建议,这一机制的设计是为了在法院拥有充足的人力资源,包括法官和辅助人员的正常情况下发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Balkan Social Science Review
Balkan Social Science Review Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信