Development of Novel Pressure Control for Subsea Pumps and Compressors

Hans Fredrik Lindøen Kjellnes, Trond William Jenssen, Joakim Almqvist, Petter Solberg, Carsten Falck Russenes
{"title":"Development of Novel Pressure Control for Subsea Pumps and Compressors","authors":"Hans Fredrik Lindøen Kjellnes, Trond William Jenssen, Joakim Almqvist, Petter Solberg, Carsten Falck Russenes","doi":"10.4043/29563-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Subsea boosting has been building a track record at increasing depths and higher pressures. This has introduced certain new challenges. Continuous development of the technology has been required to maintain the historical high reliability and operability. This paper identifies operational challenges associated with a specific deepwater field and how they were resolved. The close collaboration between the operator's and the pump supplier's teams is emphasized as a success-factor. Insight is given into the development team's problem-solving strategy, as well as the applied technology itself. Extensive use of digital tools such as advanced dynamic modelling and virtual prototyping has been applied to debug concepts ahead of physical prototyping. This resulted in a fast track project with only very few time-consuming and expensive re-iterations.\n In 2014 the world's deepest seabed boosting pump system was successfully installed and commissioned. The permanent real-time condition monitoring system allowed the pump manufacturer to remotely monitor the pump performance. During the first few months of operation, it was determined that the shut-in pressure gradient was significantly steeper than specified. The production pressure build-up following a pump stop was more abrupt than the pump's barrier fluid pressure control system was designed to deal with. Because the gradient of the pressure increase couldn't be altered, a limitation on the pump's maximum pressure drawdown was immediately put in place. This was done to minimize the amplitude of the pressure increase on shut-in, and to prevent the production pressure from exceeding the pump's barrier fluid pressure. Without such a limitation, this condition could result in a pump breakdown. Continuous operation with this constraint in place would lead to significant curtailment once additional pressure drawdown was required to maintain the nameplate production.\n Seabed pumps are equipped with a barrier fluid system, which is regarded among the main success factors leading to the high meantime to failure. The barrier fluid system provides the pump with clean fluid at a correct pressure. The barrier fluid is used for lubrication of bearings and seals, heat transfer, and electric insulation. It also constitutes a barrier, hence its name, for any production fluid ingress into the electric motor through pressure control. The pressure is being closed-loop regulated to stay within a certain band above the production pressure.\n Barrier fluid is conveyed between host facility and the subsea pump through small-bore tubing in the umbilical. Thus, quick volume exchanges between topside and subsea is limited. As the umbilical length increase, the response time, as given by speed of sound, also becomes a limiting factor. A subsea pressure control system is the most common solution in the industry for larger depths and long tie-backs.\n As the well pressures were depleting for the described deepwater field, the drawdown limit posed a risk for curtailed production. To avoid falling below the nameplate production of 170 kbbls/day, the full differential pressure capability of the pumps was soon required. The novel pressure control technology was developed, qualified and successfully implemented on the pumps. It allows for safe operation through ultra-quick production pressure changes without the need for upgrades to the umbilical. In fact, the technology allows for longer step-out and further cost savings on future umbilical and seabed boosting deployments as even smaller-sized umbilical tubing can be utilized. The successful development of the novel pressure control system prevented production curtailment altogether. The system is now successfully operating subsea, and the pumps are helping the operator to utilize the full production potential of the field.","PeriodicalId":11149,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29563-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subsea boosting has been building a track record at increasing depths and higher pressures. This has introduced certain new challenges. Continuous development of the technology has been required to maintain the historical high reliability and operability. This paper identifies operational challenges associated with a specific deepwater field and how they were resolved. The close collaboration between the operator's and the pump supplier's teams is emphasized as a success-factor. Insight is given into the development team's problem-solving strategy, as well as the applied technology itself. Extensive use of digital tools such as advanced dynamic modelling and virtual prototyping has been applied to debug concepts ahead of physical prototyping. This resulted in a fast track project with only very few time-consuming and expensive re-iterations. In 2014 the world's deepest seabed boosting pump system was successfully installed and commissioned. The permanent real-time condition monitoring system allowed the pump manufacturer to remotely monitor the pump performance. During the first few months of operation, it was determined that the shut-in pressure gradient was significantly steeper than specified. The production pressure build-up following a pump stop was more abrupt than the pump's barrier fluid pressure control system was designed to deal with. Because the gradient of the pressure increase couldn't be altered, a limitation on the pump's maximum pressure drawdown was immediately put in place. This was done to minimize the amplitude of the pressure increase on shut-in, and to prevent the production pressure from exceeding the pump's barrier fluid pressure. Without such a limitation, this condition could result in a pump breakdown. Continuous operation with this constraint in place would lead to significant curtailment once additional pressure drawdown was required to maintain the nameplate production. Seabed pumps are equipped with a barrier fluid system, which is regarded among the main success factors leading to the high meantime to failure. The barrier fluid system provides the pump with clean fluid at a correct pressure. The barrier fluid is used for lubrication of bearings and seals, heat transfer, and electric insulation. It also constitutes a barrier, hence its name, for any production fluid ingress into the electric motor through pressure control. The pressure is being closed-loop regulated to stay within a certain band above the production pressure. Barrier fluid is conveyed between host facility and the subsea pump through small-bore tubing in the umbilical. Thus, quick volume exchanges between topside and subsea is limited. As the umbilical length increase, the response time, as given by speed of sound, also becomes a limiting factor. A subsea pressure control system is the most common solution in the industry for larger depths and long tie-backs. As the well pressures were depleting for the described deepwater field, the drawdown limit posed a risk for curtailed production. To avoid falling below the nameplate production of 170 kbbls/day, the full differential pressure capability of the pumps was soon required. The novel pressure control technology was developed, qualified and successfully implemented on the pumps. It allows for safe operation through ultra-quick production pressure changes without the need for upgrades to the umbilical. In fact, the technology allows for longer step-out and further cost savings on future umbilical and seabed boosting deployments as even smaller-sized umbilical tubing can be utilized. The successful development of the novel pressure control system prevented production curtailment altogether. The system is now successfully operating subsea, and the pumps are helping the operator to utilize the full production potential of the field.
新型海底泵和压缩机压力控制技术的发展
在不断增加的深度和更高的压力下,海底增压一直在创造记录。这带来了一些新的挑战。技术的不断发展要求保持历史上的高可靠性和可操作性。本文确定了与特定深水油田相关的操作挑战以及如何解决这些挑战。作业人员和泵供应商团队之间的密切合作是成功的重要因素。深入了解开发团队的问题解决策略,以及应用的技术本身。广泛使用数字工具,如先进的动态建模和虚拟样机已应用于调试概念之前的物理样机。这导致了快速跟踪项目,只需要很少的耗时和昂贵的重复迭代。2014年,世界上最深的海底增压泵系统成功安装并调试。永久实时状态监测系统允许泵制造商远程监控泵的性能。在最初几个月的作业中,关井压力梯度明显大于规定。泵停止后的生产压力积累比泵的屏障流体压力控制系统设计的要突然得多。由于压力增加的梯度无法改变,因此立即对泵的最大压降进行了限制。这样做是为了最小化关井时的压力增幅,并防止生产压力超过泵的屏障流体压力。如果没有这样的限制,这种情况可能导致泵故障。一旦需要额外的压降来维持铭牌产量,在这种限制条件下持续运行将导致大幅削减。海底泵配备了屏障流体系统,这被认为是导致高失败率的主要成功因素之一。屏障流体系统在正确的压力下为泵提供干净的流体。屏障流体用于轴承和密封件的润滑,传热和电绝缘。它也构成了一个屏障,因此它的名字,任何生产流体进入电机通过压力控制。压力被闭环调节,保持在高于生产压力的一定范围内。隔离液通过脐带缆中的小口径油管在主机设备和海底泵之间输送。因此,上层和海底之间的快速体积交换受到限制。随着脐带长度的增加,由声速给出的响应时间也成为一个限制因素。对于大深度和长回接来说,水下压力控制系统是业内最常见的解决方案。随着所述深水油田的井压逐渐下降,降压极限带来了减产的风险。为了避免低于170 kbbls/天的铭牌产量,很快就要求泵具有完全的差压能力。该新型压力控制技术已被开发、验证并成功应用于泵上。通过超快速的生产压力变化,无需对脐带缆进行升级,即可实现安全作业。事实上,由于可以使用更小尺寸的脐带油管,该技术可以在未来的脐带和海底增压部署中实现更长时间的分段,并进一步节省成本。新型压力控制系统的成功开发完全避免了减产。目前,该系统已成功地在海底作业,泵帮助作业者充分利用油田的生产潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信