Elimination of E. faecalis and C. albicans Biofilm: A Comparison Between Single and Multiple File Systems in an Ex Vivo Study

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
V. Méndez-González, Claudia Casillas-Contreras, M. Vitales-Noyola, D. Alvarado-Hernández, A. González-Amaro, A. Aragón-Piña, A. Pozos-Guillen
{"title":"Elimination of E. faecalis and C. albicans Biofilm: A Comparison Between Single and Multiple File Systems in an Ex Vivo Study","authors":"V. Méndez-González, Claudia Casillas-Contreras, M. Vitales-Noyola, D. Alvarado-Hernández, A. González-Amaro, A. Aragón-Piña, A. Pozos-Guillen","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2022.53153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate whether the WaveOne Gold and Reciproc single file instrumentation systems, are effective in reducing the microbial load of a mixed biofilm and the cleaning of apical third compared to the Twisted File Adaptive system (multiple-file system). Seventy mesial roots of the first and second molars were included and randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=20, n=10 controls). Biofilms were formed inside canals over 31 days. After instrumentation with the unique file systems, WaveOne Gold and Reciproc and the multiple file system Twisted File Adaptive, using 2.25% sodium hypochlorite as an irrigant in all cases, a count of colony forming units was performed using serial dilutions, cleaning of the apical third was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. Comparisons amongst groups were made by using parametric and non-parametric statistics, according to a normal or non-normal data distribution, respectively.  No significant differences in the reduction of the microbial load after employing a single-file system in comparison to the multiple-file system were found; in addition, the cleaning of the apical third was similar for the three different instrumentation systems. The single-file system is equal in effectiveness compared with the multiple-file system in reducing the microbial load.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.53153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate whether the WaveOne Gold and Reciproc single file instrumentation systems, are effective in reducing the microbial load of a mixed biofilm and the cleaning of apical third compared to the Twisted File Adaptive system (multiple-file system). Seventy mesial roots of the first and second molars were included and randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=20, n=10 controls). Biofilms were formed inside canals over 31 days. After instrumentation with the unique file systems, WaveOne Gold and Reciproc and the multiple file system Twisted File Adaptive, using 2.25% sodium hypochlorite as an irrigant in all cases, a count of colony forming units was performed using serial dilutions, cleaning of the apical third was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. Comparisons amongst groups were made by using parametric and non-parametric statistics, according to a normal or non-normal data distribution, respectively.  No significant differences in the reduction of the microbial load after employing a single-file system in comparison to the multiple-file system were found; in addition, the cleaning of the apical third was similar for the three different instrumentation systems. The single-file system is equal in effectiveness compared with the multiple-file system in reducing the microbial load.
粪肠杆菌和白色念珠菌生物膜的消除:在离体研究中单个和多个文件系统的比较
与Twisted file Adaptive系统(多文件系统)相比,评估WaveOne Gold和Reciproc单文件仪器系统在减少混合生物膜的微生物负荷和根冠三分之一的清洁方面是否有效。选取70例第一、第二磨牙近中根,随机分为3个实验组(n=20,对照组n=10)。生物膜在31天内形成。使用WaveOne Gold和Reciproc独特的文件系统以及Twisted file Adaptive多文件系统,在所有情况下使用2.25%次氯酸钠作为冲洗剂,使用连续稀释进行菌落形成单位计数,使用扫描电子显微镜评估根尖三分之一的清洁情况。组间比较分别根据正态或非正态数据分布,采用参数统计和非参数统计进行。采用单文件系统与多文件系统相比,在减少微生物负荷方面没有发现显著差异;此外,对于三种不同的仪器系统,顶端三分之一的清洗是相似的。单文件系统与多文件系统在减少微生物负荷方面的效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信