3D Model Validation in Reservoir Management Optimization Workflow

Italo Luciani, S. Renna, Angelo Ortega, C. Catalani, Konstantinos Mastrogeorgiou, A. Cortese
{"title":"3D Model Validation in Reservoir Management Optimization Workflow","authors":"Italo Luciani, S. Renna, Angelo Ortega, C. Catalani, Konstantinos Mastrogeorgiou, A. Cortese","doi":"10.2118/196645-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 3D model is a valuable tool in reservoir management, provided its representativeness of reservoir dynamics.Traditional History Match mainly focuses on reproducing reservoir behavior at well scale. A good match is not always representative of fluid movements in the reservoir. The proposed approach for 3D model validation combines and compares the results of integrated production analysis, in particular flow paths identification, with history matching by using streamlines technology. Streamlines speed up the comparison process especially in complex 3D models.\n The workflow is based on a massive Production Data Analysis (PDA) where geological and dynamic data are integrated to identify preferential paths followed by the different fluid phases during the producing life of the field. The main result is the Fluid Path Conceptual Model (FPCM) where aquifer and injected water movements are clearly identified. Once the flooded areas are detected, streamlines are traced on the history matched model in order to easily compare the simulated connections with hard information from PDA. Actions to improve the model representativeness are suggested and integrated in an iterative tuning process.\n This paper presents the results of the methodology applied on two complex fields with different injection strategies. FPCMs resulting from PDA provided a powerful boost to drive the history match and speed up the whole process. Priority was given in reproducing the identified preferential paths rather than to perfectly match well production data (which can be also affected by allocation uncertainties) by means of local unrealistic adjustments.\n Streamlines were run on Intersect simulation, proving to be a fast and powerful tool for the visualization and understanding of fluid movements in the 3D Model. Since streamlines are used as visualization tool and are traced on a corner point geometry grid using fluxes provided by reservoir simulation, the reliability of the simulation output is preserved.\n Once the model is representative of the real field behavior, it can be used as predictive tool in Reservoir Management to optimize the current injection strategy, promoting most efficient injectors.","PeriodicalId":11098,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196645-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

3D model is a valuable tool in reservoir management, provided its representativeness of reservoir dynamics.Traditional History Match mainly focuses on reproducing reservoir behavior at well scale. A good match is not always representative of fluid movements in the reservoir. The proposed approach for 3D model validation combines and compares the results of integrated production analysis, in particular flow paths identification, with history matching by using streamlines technology. Streamlines speed up the comparison process especially in complex 3D models. The workflow is based on a massive Production Data Analysis (PDA) where geological and dynamic data are integrated to identify preferential paths followed by the different fluid phases during the producing life of the field. The main result is the Fluid Path Conceptual Model (FPCM) where aquifer and injected water movements are clearly identified. Once the flooded areas are detected, streamlines are traced on the history matched model in order to easily compare the simulated connections with hard information from PDA. Actions to improve the model representativeness are suggested and integrated in an iterative tuning process. This paper presents the results of the methodology applied on two complex fields with different injection strategies. FPCMs resulting from PDA provided a powerful boost to drive the history match and speed up the whole process. Priority was given in reproducing the identified preferential paths rather than to perfectly match well production data (which can be also affected by allocation uncertainties) by means of local unrealistic adjustments. Streamlines were run on Intersect simulation, proving to be a fast and powerful tool for the visualization and understanding of fluid movements in the 3D Model. Since streamlines are used as visualization tool and are traced on a corner point geometry grid using fluxes provided by reservoir simulation, the reliability of the simulation output is preserved. Once the model is representative of the real field behavior, it can be used as predictive tool in Reservoir Management to optimize the current injection strategy, promoting most efficient injectors.
油藏管理优化流程中的三维模型验证
三维模型具有油藏动态的代表性,是油藏管理的重要工具。传统的历史匹配主要侧重于在井规模上重现油藏的动态。良好的匹配并不总是能代表储层中的流体运动。提出的3D模型验证方法结合并比较了集成生产分析的结果,特别是流线识别,并使用流线技术进行历史匹配。流线加速了比较过程,特别是在复杂的3D模型中。该工作流程基于大规模生产数据分析(PDA),将地质和动态数据集成在一起,以确定油田生产周期内不同流体相遵循的优先路径。主要结果是流体路径概念模型(FPCM),其中含水层和注入水的运动被清楚地识别出来。一旦检测到洪水区域,在历史匹配模型上跟踪流线,以便轻松地将模拟连接与PDA的硬信息进行比较。提出了改进模型代表性的措施,并将其集成到迭代调优过程中。本文介绍了该方法在两个具有不同注入策略的复杂油田的应用结果。由PDA产生的fpcm为驱动历史匹配提供了强大的推动力,加快了整个过程。优先考虑的是再现已确定的优先路径,而不是通过局部不现实的调整来完美匹配油井生产数据(这也会受到分配不确定性的影响)。在Intersect仿真上运行流线,证明它是一种快速而强大的工具,用于可视化和理解3D模型中的流体运动。由于流线被用作可视化工具,并使用油藏模拟提供的通量在角点几何网格上进行跟踪,因此保持了模拟输出的可靠性。一旦该模型代表了真实的油田动态,它就可以作为油藏管理的预测工具来优化当前的注入策略,提高注入效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信