Primary elements of the indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination and their reflection in international cases

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
M. Zadorin, E. Gladun
{"title":"Primary elements of the indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination and their reflection in international cases","authors":"M. Zadorin, E. Gladun","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).121-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article touches upon the issues of law enforcement and court practice related to the collective rights of aboriginal communities.The purpose of the article is to reveal the content of the right to self-determination through the prism of the most significant cases related to indigenous peoples.The methodological basis of research is the general principles of scientific knowledge, widely used in works in the field of law: system-structural, formal-legal, comparative-legal, historical, methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, etc. Particular attention was paid to the formal legal method, which was used by the authors of the study to analyze international judicial practice on the rights of indigenous peoples, as well as, in some cases, the national legislation of the countries participating in a particular case.The main results, scope of application. The right to self-determination of indigenous peoples is multicomponent and includes a number of specific elements and facets of interpretation. The authors have made an attempt to reveal the fundamental elements of the right to self-determination of indigenous peoples, which, in their opinion, consist of: the right to sovereignty as such, or autonomy and recognition as collective subjects of law, the right to land and resources, traditional nature management, autonomous education, mothertongue and culture.For each of the above-mentioned elements, a specific case is described, which was considered in international courts, primarily in the International Court of Justice, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the ECHR and etc.Conclusions. International recognition of a state through inclusion in the UN General Assembly is impossible without the permission of the Security Council; the issue of “effective occupation” has played and continues to play a large role in the issue of governance and sovereignty over a specific space and territory, and not only settlers, but also traditionally living indigenous peoples play a significant role;Indigenous peoples living in the coastal zone should have the right to dispose of income from the exploitation of the continental shelf; the relationship with the land is not only a matter of ownership and production, but a material and spiritual element that indigenous peoples must fully enjoy, if only to preserve their cultural heritage and pass it on to future generations; the status of “national minority” deprives the indigenous people of priority in the use of land for traditional reindeer herding; means of ensuring freedom of expression of indigenous peoples is an important element for the promotion of identity, language, culture, self-identification, collective rights.","PeriodicalId":40342,"journal":{"name":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).121-138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article touches upon the issues of law enforcement and court practice related to the collective rights of aboriginal communities.The purpose of the article is to reveal the content of the right to self-determination through the prism of the most significant cases related to indigenous peoples.The methodological basis of research is the general principles of scientific knowledge, widely used in works in the field of law: system-structural, formal-legal, comparative-legal, historical, methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, etc. Particular attention was paid to the formal legal method, which was used by the authors of the study to analyze international judicial practice on the rights of indigenous peoples, as well as, in some cases, the national legislation of the countries participating in a particular case.The main results, scope of application. The right to self-determination of indigenous peoples is multicomponent and includes a number of specific elements and facets of interpretation. The authors have made an attempt to reveal the fundamental elements of the right to self-determination of indigenous peoples, which, in their opinion, consist of: the right to sovereignty as such, or autonomy and recognition as collective subjects of law, the right to land and resources, traditional nature management, autonomous education, mothertongue and culture.For each of the above-mentioned elements, a specific case is described, which was considered in international courts, primarily in the International Court of Justice, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the ECHR and etc.Conclusions. International recognition of a state through inclusion in the UN General Assembly is impossible without the permission of the Security Council; the issue of “effective occupation” has played and continues to play a large role in the issue of governance and sovereignty over a specific space and territory, and not only settlers, but also traditionally living indigenous peoples play a significant role;Indigenous peoples living in the coastal zone should have the right to dispose of income from the exploitation of the continental shelf; the relationship with the land is not only a matter of ownership and production, but a material and spiritual element that indigenous peoples must fully enjoy, if only to preserve their cultural heritage and pass it on to future generations; the status of “national minority” deprives the indigenous people of priority in the use of land for traditional reindeer herding; means of ensuring freedom of expression of indigenous peoples is an important element for the promotion of identity, language, culture, self-identification, collective rights.
土著人民自决权的主要因素及其在国际案件中的反映
这篇文章触及了与原住民社区集体权利有关的执法和法院实践问题。这篇文章的目的是通过与土著人民有关的最重要的案例来揭示自决权的内容。研究的方法论基础是科学知识的一般原则,在法律领域的著作中广泛使用:系统结构法、形式法、比较法、历史法、分析综合法、类比法等。特别注意了正式的法律方法,该研究报告的作者使用正式的法律方法来分析关于土著人民权利的国际司法实践,在某些情况下,还分析了参与某一特定案件的国家的国家立法。主要成果,适用范围。土著人民的自决权是多方面的,包括若干具体因素和解释方面。作者们试图揭示土著人民自决权的基本要素,他们认为这些要素包括:主权本身的权利或自治权以及作为集体法律主体的承认、土地和资源的权利、传统自然管理、自主教育、母语和文化。对于上述每一个要素,都描述了一个具体的案例,这些案例在国际法院,主要是在国际法院、美洲人权法院、欧洲人权法院等进行了审议。如果没有安理会的许可,一个国家不可能通过加入联合国大会而得到国际承认;“有效占领”问题在特定空间和领土的治理和主权问题上已经并继续发挥着重要作用,不仅移民,而且传统上生活的土著人民也发挥着重要作用;居住在沿海地区的土著人民应有权处置开发大陆架的收入;与土地的关系不仅是所有权和生产问题,而且是土著人民必须充分享有的物质和精神因素,如果只是为了保护其文化遗产并将其传给后代的话;“少数民族”的地位剥夺了土著人民优先使用土地进行传统驯鹿放牧的权利;确保土著人民言论自由的手段是促进认同、语言、文化、自我认同和集体权利的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信