Comparative legal analysis of processes of merger and accession of economic organizations in national and foreign legislation (EU, UK, USA)

N. Shcherbakova
{"title":"Comparative legal analysis of processes of merger and accession of economic organizations in national and foreign legislation (EU, UK, USA)","authors":"N. Shcherbakova","doi":"10.15587/2523-4153.2023.283562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking into account Provisions of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU in the field of legislation on companies and corporate governance, which leads to the regulation of the activities of corporations, in particular the regulation of the processes of reorganization of economic organizations at the national level to the requirements of international standards and a gradual rapprochement with the rules and recommendations of the EU, a comparative legal research of the process of merger and accession of economic organizations today seems necessary and actual. \nIt is distinguished, general and distinctive qualifying signs of merger and accession of economic organizations, which will be used to improve the concepts provided to these processes. It is substantiated that mergers and accessions are independent forms of reorganization of economic organizations. \nThe comparative legal analysis of legislation of Ukraine with the legislation of the EU, the Member States of the EU (Belgium, Germany, France), Great Britain and the USA on the issues of reorganization in the form of merger and accession is provided and the following main conclusions are made: \nin the legislation of the EU and in the legislation of the EU Member States there are two ways of merging: (1) “merger by acquisition”/ “merger to an existing company” and (2) “merger by the formation of a new company”/ “merger to a new company”, which in its essence corresponds to such domestic forms of reorganization as “accession” and “merger”, accordingly; \nin the legislation of the EU, Great Britain, as well as EU member states, such a category as “accession” is not allocated as an independent legal form of reorganization of the company, but is considered as a kind of “merger” category; \nin US Law, merger processes of two or more corporations are indicated by terms such as “merger” and “consolidation”; US Tax Law applies the concept of “corporate reorganization”, which has 7 types of reorganizations (A-G), among which there are one of the types – a type A “statutory merger or consolidation”, which in its essence corresponds to the processes of merger and accession, which is inherent in domestic legislation; \nin the legislation of foreign countries, the concepts of “merger”, “consolidation”, “amalgamation”, “acquisition”, “takeover” are similar to each other; in economic essence relate to the forms of business consolidation; act as an instrument to increase the competitiveness of the company; from a legal point of view differ from each other – according to the procedure; \nin the legislation and practice of foreign countries, the variety of processes such as “merger”, “consolidation”, “amalgamation”, “acquisition”, “takeover” is covered by a single economic and legal phenomenon, as “Merger and Acquisition” or M&A, which by the legal nature of the concluded agreements is much wider than such domestic forms of reorganization of economic organizations as “merger” and “accession” and is not always accompanied by the implementation of reorganization process","PeriodicalId":33324,"journal":{"name":"ScienceRise Juridical Science","volume":"os-9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceRise Juridical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.283562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taking into account Provisions of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU in the field of legislation on companies and corporate governance, which leads to the regulation of the activities of corporations, in particular the regulation of the processes of reorganization of economic organizations at the national level to the requirements of international standards and a gradual rapprochement with the rules and recommendations of the EU, a comparative legal research of the process of merger and accession of economic organizations today seems necessary and actual. It is distinguished, general and distinctive qualifying signs of merger and accession of economic organizations, which will be used to improve the concepts provided to these processes. It is substantiated that mergers and accessions are independent forms of reorganization of economic organizations. The comparative legal analysis of legislation of Ukraine with the legislation of the EU, the Member States of the EU (Belgium, Germany, France), Great Britain and the USA on the issues of reorganization in the form of merger and accession is provided and the following main conclusions are made: in the legislation of the EU and in the legislation of the EU Member States there are two ways of merging: (1) “merger by acquisition”/ “merger to an existing company” and (2) “merger by the formation of a new company”/ “merger to a new company”, which in its essence corresponds to such domestic forms of reorganization as “accession” and “merger”, accordingly; in the legislation of the EU, Great Britain, as well as EU member states, such a category as “accession” is not allocated as an independent legal form of reorganization of the company, but is considered as a kind of “merger” category; in US Law, merger processes of two or more corporations are indicated by terms such as “merger” and “consolidation”; US Tax Law applies the concept of “corporate reorganization”, which has 7 types of reorganizations (A-G), among which there are one of the types – a type A “statutory merger or consolidation”, which in its essence corresponds to the processes of merger and accession, which is inherent in domestic legislation; in the legislation of foreign countries, the concepts of “merger”, “consolidation”, “amalgamation”, “acquisition”, “takeover” are similar to each other; in economic essence relate to the forms of business consolidation; act as an instrument to increase the competitiveness of the company; from a legal point of view differ from each other – according to the procedure; in the legislation and practice of foreign countries, the variety of processes such as “merger”, “consolidation”, “amalgamation”, “acquisition”, “takeover” is covered by a single economic and legal phenomenon, as “Merger and Acquisition” or M&A, which by the legal nature of the concluded agreements is much wider than such domestic forms of reorganization of economic organizations as “merger” and “accession” and is not always accompanied by the implementation of reorganization process
国内与国外立法中经济组织合并与加入过程的比较法律分析(欧盟、英国、美国)
考虑到《乌克兰与欧盟联系国协定》在公司和公司管理立法领域的规定,这些规定导致对公司活动进行监管,特别是对国家一级经济组织的重组过程进行监管,使其符合国际标准的要求,并逐步与欧盟的规则和建议保持一致,在今天,对经济组织兼并过程进行比较法学研究显得十分必要和现实。这是经济组织合并和加入的显著、普遍和独特的合格标志,将用于改进为这些进程提供的概念。合并与加入是经济组织独立的重组形式。通过对乌克兰立法与欧盟立法、欧盟成员国(比利时、德国、法国)、英国和美国在合并加入形式的重组问题上的比较法律分析,得出以下主要结论:在欧盟立法和欧盟成员国立法中存在两种合并方式:(1)“收购合并”/“与现有公司合并”;(2)“组建新公司合并”/“与新公司合并”,实质上与国内的“加入”、“合并”等重组形式相对应;在欧盟、英国以及欧盟成员国的立法中,“加入”这一类别并没有被分配为公司重组的独立法律形式,而是被认为是一种“合并”类别;在美国法律中,两个或两个以上公司的合并过程用“合并”和“合并”等术语来表示;美国税法适用“公司重组”的概念,重组有7种类型(a - g),其中有一种类型——a类“法定合并或合并”,其本质上对应于并购和加入的过程,这是国内立法所固有的;在国外立法中,“合并”、“整合”、“合并”、“收购”、“接管”等概念彼此相似;在经济本质上与企业合并的形式有关;作为提高公司竞争力的工具;从法律的角度来看彼此不同——根据程序;在国外立法和实践中,“兼并”、“合并”、“兼并”、“收购”、“接管”等多种过程被单一的经济和法律现象所涵盖,即“并购”或并购,其订立的协议的法律性质远比国内经济组织的“合并”、“加入”等重组形式要广泛得多,而且并不总是伴随着重组过程的实施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书