Comparing epidemiological models with the help of visualization dashboards

IF 0.3 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Csaba Farkas, David Iclanzan, Boróka Olteán-Péter, Géza Vekov
{"title":"Comparing epidemiological models with the help of visualization dashboards","authors":"Csaba Farkas, David Iclanzan, Boróka Olteán-Péter, Géza Vekov","doi":"10.2478/ausi-2020-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2020, due to the COVID − 19 pandemic, various epidemiological models appeared in major studies [16, 22, 21], which differ in terms of complexity, type, etc. In accordance with the hypothesis, a complex model is more accurate and gives more reliable results than a simpler one because it takes into consideration more parameters. In this paper we study three different epidemiological models: a SIR, a SEIR and a SEIR − type model. Our aim is to set up differential equation models, which rely on similar parameters, however, the systems of equation and number of parameters deviate from each other. A visualization dashboard is implemented through this study, and thus, we are able not only to study the models but also to make users understand the differences between the complexity of epidemiological models, and ultimately, to share a more specific overview about these that are defined by differential equations [24]. In order to validate our results, we make a comparison between the three models and the empirical data from Northern Italy and Wuhan, based on the infectious cases of COVID-19. To validate our results, we calculate the values of the parameters using the Least Square optimization algorithm.","PeriodicalId":41480,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica","volume":"32 1","pages":"260 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausi-2020-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In 2020, due to the COVID − 19 pandemic, various epidemiological models appeared in major studies [16, 22, 21], which differ in terms of complexity, type, etc. In accordance with the hypothesis, a complex model is more accurate and gives more reliable results than a simpler one because it takes into consideration more parameters. In this paper we study three different epidemiological models: a SIR, a SEIR and a SEIR − type model. Our aim is to set up differential equation models, which rely on similar parameters, however, the systems of equation and number of parameters deviate from each other. A visualization dashboard is implemented through this study, and thus, we are able not only to study the models but also to make users understand the differences between the complexity of epidemiological models, and ultimately, to share a more specific overview about these that are defined by differential equations [24]. In order to validate our results, we make a comparison between the three models and the empirical data from Northern Italy and Wuhan, based on the infectious cases of COVID-19. To validate our results, we calculate the values of the parameters using the Least Square optimization algorithm.
借助可视化仪表板比较流行病学模型
2020年,由于COVID - 19大流行,各大研究中出现了各种流行病学模型[16,22,21],这些模型在复杂性、类型等方面存在差异。根据该假设,复杂模型由于考虑了更多的参数,因此比简单模型更准确,给出的结果更可靠。本文研究了三种不同的流行病学模型:SIR模型、SEIR模型和SEIR -型模型。我们的目标是建立微分方程模型,这些模型依赖于相似的参数,但是方程系统和参数数量彼此偏离。通过本研究实现了一个可视化仪表板,因此,我们不仅能够研究模型,还能够让用户了解流行病学模型复杂性之间的差异,并最终分享由微分方程定义的这些模型的更具体概述[24]。为了验证我们的结果,我们将三种模型与意大利北部和武汉的实证数据进行比较,并以COVID-19感染病例为基础。为了验证我们的结果,我们使用最小二乘优化算法计算参数的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信