Arc-Flags Meet Trip-Based Public Transit Routing

Ernestine Großmann, J. Sauer, Christian Schulz, Patrick Steil
{"title":"Arc-Flags Meet Trip-Based Public Transit Routing","authors":"Ernestine Großmann, J. Sauer, Christian Schulz, Patrick Steil","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2302.07168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present Arc-Flag TB, a journey planning algorithm for public transit networks which combines Trip-Based Public Transit Routing (TB) with the Arc-Flags speedup technique. Compared to previous attempts to apply Arc-Flags to public transit networks, which saw limited success, our approach uses stronger pruning rules to reduce the search space. Our experiments show that Arc-Flag TB achieves a speedup of up to two orders of magnitude over TB, offering query times of less than a millisecond even on large countrywide networks. Compared to the state-of-the-art speedup technique Trip-Based Public Transit Routing Using Condensed Search Trees (TB-CST), our algorithm achieves similar query times but requires significantly less additional memory. Other state-of-the-art algorithms which achieve even faster query times, e.g., Public Transit Labeling, require enormous memory usage. In contrast, Arc-Flag TB offers a tradeoff between query performance and memory usage due to the fact that the number of regions in the network partition required by our algorithm is a configurable parameter. We also identify an issue in the transfer precomputation of TB that affects both TB-CST and Arc-Flag TB, leading to incorrect answers for some queries. This has not been previously recognized by the author of TB-CST. We provide discussion on how to resolve this issue in the future. Currently, Arc-Flag TB answers 1-6% of queries incorrectly, compared to over 20% for TB-CST on some networks.","PeriodicalId":9448,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan","volume":"222 1","pages":"16:1-16:18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.07168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We present Arc-Flag TB, a journey planning algorithm for public transit networks which combines Trip-Based Public Transit Routing (TB) with the Arc-Flags speedup technique. Compared to previous attempts to apply Arc-Flags to public transit networks, which saw limited success, our approach uses stronger pruning rules to reduce the search space. Our experiments show that Arc-Flag TB achieves a speedup of up to two orders of magnitude over TB, offering query times of less than a millisecond even on large countrywide networks. Compared to the state-of-the-art speedup technique Trip-Based Public Transit Routing Using Condensed Search Trees (TB-CST), our algorithm achieves similar query times but requires significantly less additional memory. Other state-of-the-art algorithms which achieve even faster query times, e.g., Public Transit Labeling, require enormous memory usage. In contrast, Arc-Flag TB offers a tradeoff between query performance and memory usage due to the fact that the number of regions in the network partition required by our algorithm is a configurable parameter. We also identify an issue in the transfer precomputation of TB that affects both TB-CST and Arc-Flag TB, leading to incorrect answers for some queries. This has not been previously recognized by the author of TB-CST. We provide discussion on how to resolve this issue in the future. Currently, Arc-Flag TB answers 1-6% of queries incorrectly, compared to over 20% for TB-CST on some networks.
弧形标志满足基于出行的公共交通路线
本文提出了一种基于行程的公共交通路由(TB)与Arc-Flags加速技术相结合的公共交通网络行程规划算法。与之前将Arc-Flags应用于公共交通网络的尝试相比,我们的方法使用了更强的修剪规则来减少搜索空间。我们的实验表明,Arc-Flag TB比TB实现了高达两个数量级的加速,即使在大型全国性网络上也提供不到一毫秒的查询时间。与最先进的加速技术基于行程的公共交通路由使用压缩搜索树(TB-CST)相比,我们的算法实现了相似的查询时间,但需要的额外内存要少得多。其他最先进的算法实现更快的查询时间,例如,公共交通标签,需要大量的内存使用。相反,Arc-Flag TB提供了查询性能和内存使用之间的折衷,因为我们的算法所需的网络分区中区域的数量是一个可配置的参数。我们还确定了TB的传输预计算中的一个问题,该问题影响TB- cst和Arc-Flag TB,导致某些查询的答案不正确。TB-CST的作者以前没有认识到这一点。我们提供了关于将来如何解决这个问题的讨论。目前,Arc-Flag TB错误回答了1-6%的查询,而在某些网络上,TB- cst错误回答率超过20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信