KONSTITUSIONALITAS TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DALAM MELINDUNGI PEMBELA HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Adi Purnomo Santoso, Dina Liliyana
{"title":"KONSTITUSIONALITAS TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DALAM MELINDUNGI PEMBELA HAK ASASI MANUSIA","authors":"Adi Purnomo Santoso, Dina Liliyana","doi":"10.47313/PPL.V6I1.1110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the amendment of 1999-2002, the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 (UUD NRI 1945) as the constitution has contained material or substance more complete to the protection of human rights (human rights) than before the amendment. This is however a commitment of the state to qualify the existence of Indonesia as a state of Pancasila law that embraces constitutional democracy. In the epicentre of human rights protection, including how the state's responsibility in protecting human rights defenders. However, in contrast to what is regulated in the text of the constitution, in practice as revealed in the report of the Institute for Public Studies and Advocacy (ELSAM) noted that during 2019, there have been 27 cases of violence against environmental defenders with the spread of cases reaching 14 provinces and 24 districts and resulted in 127 individuals and 50 groups of Environmental Human Rights Defenders being victimized. This study aims to describe and review how the responsibility of the state in protecting human rights defenders constitutionally. The research method used is normative research with qualitative analysis approach, where data collection is done through literature studies. The result of this research is that Indonesia as the state of Pancasila law has constitutionally mandated the state (government) to specifically protect human rights defenders. By protecting human rights defenders, the state is not only implementing the constitution as the substance of living law, but also as an effort to promote universal human dignity and dignity.","PeriodicalId":30812,"journal":{"name":"Wacana Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wacana Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47313/PPL.V6I1.1110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the amendment of 1999-2002, the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 (UUD NRI 1945) as the constitution has contained material or substance more complete to the protection of human rights (human rights) than before the amendment. This is however a commitment of the state to qualify the existence of Indonesia as a state of Pancasila law that embraces constitutional democracy. In the epicentre of human rights protection, including how the state's responsibility in protecting human rights defenders. However, in contrast to what is regulated in the text of the constitution, in practice as revealed in the report of the Institute for Public Studies and Advocacy (ELSAM) noted that during 2019, there have been 27 cases of violence against environmental defenders with the spread of cases reaching 14 provinces and 24 districts and resulted in 127 individuals and 50 groups of Environmental Human Rights Defenders being victimized. This study aims to describe and review how the responsibility of the state in protecting human rights defenders constitutionally. The research method used is normative research with qualitative analysis approach, where data collection is done through literature studies. The result of this research is that Indonesia as the state of Pancasila law has constitutionally mandated the state (government) to specifically protect human rights defenders. By protecting human rights defenders, the state is not only implementing the constitution as the substance of living law, but also as an effort to promote universal human dignity and dignity.
国家保护人权捍卫者的责任的合宪性
在1999-2002年修正案之后,1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法(UUD NRI 1945)作为宪法包含了比修正案之前更完整的保护人权(人权)的材料或内容。然而,这是国家的一项承诺,使印度尼西亚成为一个信奉宪政民主的潘卡西拉法律的国家。在人权保护的中心,包括国家在保护人权维护者方面的责任。然而,与宪法文本的规定相反,正如公共研究和倡导研究所(ELSAM)的报告所揭示的那样,在实践中,2019年期间发生了27起针对环境维护者的暴力案件,案件蔓延到14个省和24个区,导致127名个人和50个环境人权维护者团体成为受害者。本研究旨在描述和回顾国家在保护人权捍卫者方面的责任如何符合宪法。使用的研究方法是规范研究与定性分析的方法,其中通过文献研究来收集数据。这项研究的结果是,印度尼西亚作为潘卡西拉法的国家,在宪法上授权国家(政府)专门保护人权维护者。国家通过保护人权捍卫者,不仅是在落实宪法这一活生生的法律实质,而且是在努力促进人的普遍尊严和尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信