Concordance between Patients and Clinicians for Reporting Symptoms Associated with Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C during a Pragmatic Clinical Trial

GastroHep Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1155/2022/2673911
B. Reeve, L. Michael, J. Peter, P. Stewart, A. Lok, Meichen Dong, Ken Bergquist, D. Nelson, D. Evon
{"title":"Concordance between Patients and Clinicians for Reporting Symptoms Associated with Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C during a Pragmatic Clinical Trial","authors":"B. Reeve, L. Michael, J. Peter, P. Stewart, A. Lok, Meichen Dong, Ken Bergquist, D. Nelson, D. Evon","doi":"10.1155/2022/2673911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Despite high efficacy rates for direct acting antiviral regimens to cure hepatitis C virus infection, many patients experience treatment-related symptoms. Accurate reporting of adverse events is mandatory to determine drug safety. Previous research in other medical conditions has documented discordance between clinician-reported and patient-reported symptomatic adverse events. Aims. To explore concordance and associated factors, between clinician-recorded and patient-reported fatigue, headache, and nausea/vomiting during a clinical trial of three treatment regimens. Methods. Data were collected between treatment start and 31 days posttreatment. Patients completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures of fatigue and nausea/vomiting and the Headache Impact Test. Clinician-recorded data were abstracted from medical records. Concordance was evaluated by weighted kappa. Demographic and clinical factors associated with concordance were identified using logistic regression models. Results. Participants included 1,058 patients treated for chronic hepatitis C (average 54.9 years; 43% Black; 59% male). Weighted kappa estimates and 95% confidence intervals between patients (no/mild vs. moderate/severe symptoms) and clinicians (not present vs. present) were fatigue (\n \n k\n =\n 0.09\n \n , 0.02-0.16), headache (\n \n k\n =\n 0.08\n \n , 0.02-0.14), and nausea/vomiting (\n \n k\n =\n 0.20\n \n , 0.11-0.28). Older age and having private insurance (compared to Medicaid) were associated with better headache concordance. Older age, male, absence of psychiatric condition, and ≤2 comorbidities were associated with better nausea/vomiting concordance. Conclusions. Poor concordance was observed between patient-reported and clinician-recorded symptomatic adverse events. Despite study limitations, previous literature in other conditions support these findings. Integrating patient-reported data to inform adverse event reporting would improve evaluations of treatment safety (http://CT.gov/ Registration: NCT02786537).","PeriodicalId":12480,"journal":{"name":"GastroHep","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GastroHep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2673911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Despite high efficacy rates for direct acting antiviral regimens to cure hepatitis C virus infection, many patients experience treatment-related symptoms. Accurate reporting of adverse events is mandatory to determine drug safety. Previous research in other medical conditions has documented discordance between clinician-reported and patient-reported symptomatic adverse events. Aims. To explore concordance and associated factors, between clinician-recorded and patient-reported fatigue, headache, and nausea/vomiting during a clinical trial of three treatment regimens. Methods. Data were collected between treatment start and 31 days posttreatment. Patients completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures of fatigue and nausea/vomiting and the Headache Impact Test. Clinician-recorded data were abstracted from medical records. Concordance was evaluated by weighted kappa. Demographic and clinical factors associated with concordance were identified using logistic regression models. Results. Participants included 1,058 patients treated for chronic hepatitis C (average 54.9 years; 43% Black; 59% male). Weighted kappa estimates and 95% confidence intervals between patients (no/mild vs. moderate/severe symptoms) and clinicians (not present vs. present) were fatigue ( k = 0.09 , 0.02-0.16), headache ( k = 0.08 , 0.02-0.14), and nausea/vomiting ( k = 0.20 , 0.11-0.28). Older age and having private insurance (compared to Medicaid) were associated with better headache concordance. Older age, male, absence of psychiatric condition, and ≤2 comorbidities were associated with better nausea/vomiting concordance. Conclusions. Poor concordance was observed between patient-reported and clinician-recorded symptomatic adverse events. Despite study limitations, previous literature in other conditions support these findings. Integrating patient-reported data to inform adverse event reporting would improve evaluations of treatment safety (http://CT.gov/ Registration: NCT02786537).
在一项实用的临床试验中,慢性丙型肝炎患者和临床医生报告治疗相关症状的一致性
背景。尽管直接抗病毒治疗方案治愈丙型肝炎病毒感染的有效率很高,但许多患者会出现与治疗相关的症状。准确报告不良事件是确定药物安全性的必要条件。先前在其他医疗条件下的研究已经证明了临床报告和患者报告的症状性不良事件之间的不一致。目标在三种治疗方案的临床试验中,探讨临床记录和患者报告的疲劳、头痛和恶心/呕吐之间的一致性和相关因素。方法。数据收集于治疗开始至治疗后31天。患者完成了患者报告结果测量信息系统的疲劳和恶心/呕吐测量以及头痛影响试验。临床记录数据从病历中提取。采用加权kappa评价一致性。使用逻辑回归模型确定与一致性相关的人口学和临床因素。结果。参与者包括1058名接受慢性丙型肝炎治疗的患者(平均54.9岁;43%是黑人;59%的男性)。加权kappa估计和患者(无/轻度vs.中度/严重症状)与临床医生(未出现vs.出现)之间的95%置信区间为疲劳(k = 0.09, 0.02-0.16)、头痛(k = 0.08, 0.02-0.14)和恶心/呕吐(k = 0.20, 0.11-0.28)。年龄较大和拥有私人保险(与医疗补助相比)与更好的头痛一致性相关。年龄较大、男性、无精神疾病和≤2种合并症与较好的恶心/呕吐一致性相关。结论。在患者报告和临床记录的症状性不良事件之间观察到较差的一致性。尽管研究有局限性,但以前的文献在其他条件下支持这些发现。整合患者报告的数据以告知不良事件报告将改善治疗安全性评估(http://CT.gov/注册:NCT02786537)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信