{"title":"Passport to the future: Boosting academic outcomes and citizenship through urban debate","authors":"Joseph N Patten, Stephen J. Chapman","doi":"10.1177/20471734211001790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impact of a university-high school debate mentoring program on educational outcomes of high school graduates attending a racially segregated school in New Jersey, USA. Evidence shows that from 2011 to 2018, participants had stronger grade point average growth, higher cumulative grade point averages, and higher SAT scores relative to non-debating graduates. The sample (N = 275) consists of 55 high school graduates who competed on the debate team and a control group of 220 non-debating graduates. Findings indicate debate graduates experienced a 0.81 GPA growth (2.5–3.31) from 9th grade to 12th grade while non-debate graduates exhibited a markedly lower 0.10 GPA growth (2.2–2.3). Debaters scored higher on particular sections of the SAT exam and overall SAT scores. The study provides evidence of the potential efficacy of debate team membership on student outcomes.","PeriodicalId":52531,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","volume":"23 1","pages":"17 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20471734211001790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the impact of a university-high school debate mentoring program on educational outcomes of high school graduates attending a racially segregated school in New Jersey, USA. Evidence shows that from 2011 to 2018, participants had stronger grade point average growth, higher cumulative grade point averages, and higher SAT scores relative to non-debating graduates. The sample (N = 275) consists of 55 high school graduates who competed on the debate team and a control group of 220 non-debating graduates. Findings indicate debate graduates experienced a 0.81 GPA growth (2.5–3.31) from 9th grade to 12th grade while non-debate graduates exhibited a markedly lower 0.10 GPA growth (2.2–2.3). Debaters scored higher on particular sections of the SAT exam and overall SAT scores. The study provides evidence of the potential efficacy of debate team membership on student outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education (CSEE) is the official journal of the International Association for Citizenship, Social and Economics Education. CSEE is an online-only, peer-reviewed journal that provides a focus for scholarly and professional studies in the fields of education, socialisation, curriculum development and aspects of economics, sociology, politics and social psychology. The journal aims to bring together this range of disciplines into an enabling forum of discussion and exchange. It includes analyses of how children learn about societies, current and past, reports and accounts of current research from a variety of disciplines, as well as reporting and analysing contemporary professional practices and innovations, in curriculum and in the organisation of educational change in these areas.