“Down Beside where the Waters Flow": Reclaiming Rivers for American Studies (Introduction)

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Manlio Della Marca, Uwe Lübken
{"title":"“Down Beside where the Waters Flow\": Reclaiming Rivers for American Studies (Introduction)","authors":"Manlio Della Marca, Uwe Lübken","doi":"10.31261/rias.12459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past three decades, rivers have become a fascinating and popular subject of scholarly interest, not only in the field of environmental history, where river histories have developed into a distinct subgenre, but also in the emerging field of environmental humanities. In this scholarship, rivers have often been reconceptualized as socio-natural sites where human and non-human actors interact with the natural world, generating complex legacies, path dependencies, and feedback loops. Furthermore, rivers have been described as hybrid “organic machines,” whose energy has been utilized by humans in many different ways, including the harvesting of both hydropower and salmon. Indeed, as several environmental historians have noted, in many regions of the world, watercourses have been transformed by technology to such an extent that they increasingly resemble enviro-technical assemblages rather than natural waterways. Rivers have also been discussed through the lens of “eco-biography,” a term coined by Mark Cioc in his influential monograph on the Rhine River, a book informed by “the notion that a river is a biological entity—that it has a ‘life’ and ‘a personality’ and therefore a ‘biography’.” Quite surprisingly, despite this “river turn” (to use Evenden's phrase), rivers have played a marginal role in recent American Studies scholarship. To address this gap, this issue of RIAS brings together scholars from different disciplines, countries, and continents to analyze a wide variety of river experiences, histories, and representations across the American hemisphere and beyond. Hence the title of this volume, Rivers of the Americas, should be seen as both an allusion to the Rivers of America book series (a popular series of sixty-five volumes, each on a particular US river, published between 1937 and 1974) and as a reminder of the still untapped potential of hemispheric, transnational, and comparative modes of critical engagement with rivers in American Studies.","PeriodicalId":37268,"journal":{"name":"Review of International American Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/rias.12459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the past three decades, rivers have become a fascinating and popular subject of scholarly interest, not only in the field of environmental history, where river histories have developed into a distinct subgenre, but also in the emerging field of environmental humanities. In this scholarship, rivers have often been reconceptualized as socio-natural sites where human and non-human actors interact with the natural world, generating complex legacies, path dependencies, and feedback loops. Furthermore, rivers have been described as hybrid “organic machines,” whose energy has been utilized by humans in many different ways, including the harvesting of both hydropower and salmon. Indeed, as several environmental historians have noted, in many regions of the world, watercourses have been transformed by technology to such an extent that they increasingly resemble enviro-technical assemblages rather than natural waterways. Rivers have also been discussed through the lens of “eco-biography,” a term coined by Mark Cioc in his influential monograph on the Rhine River, a book informed by “the notion that a river is a biological entity—that it has a ‘life’ and ‘a personality’ and therefore a ‘biography’.” Quite surprisingly, despite this “river turn” (to use Evenden's phrase), rivers have played a marginal role in recent American Studies scholarship. To address this gap, this issue of RIAS brings together scholars from different disciplines, countries, and continents to analyze a wide variety of river experiences, histories, and representations across the American hemisphere and beyond. Hence the title of this volume, Rivers of the Americas, should be seen as both an allusion to the Rivers of America book series (a popular series of sixty-five volumes, each on a particular US river, published between 1937 and 1974) and as a reminder of the still untapped potential of hemispheric, transnational, and comparative modes of critical engagement with rivers in American Studies.
“在水流的旁边”:为美国研究再造河流(导论)
在过去的三十年里,河流已经成为一个迷人而流行的学术兴趣主题,不仅在环境史领域,河流史已经发展成为一个独特的分支,而且在新兴的环境人文领域。在这一学术研究中,河流经常被重新定义为人类和非人类行为者与自然世界互动的社会自然场所,产生复杂的遗产、路径依赖和反馈循环。此外,河流被描述为混合的“有机机器”,其能量被人类以许多不同的方式利用,包括收获水力发电和鲑鱼。的确,正如几位环境历史学家所指出的那样,在世界许多地区,水道已经被技术改变到如此程度,以至于它们越来越像环境技术的组合,而不是自然水道。河流也通过“生态传记”的视角被讨论,这个术语是马克·乔克在他关于莱茵河的有影响力的专著中创造的,这本书的内容是“河流是一个生物实体的概念——它有‘生命’和‘个性’,因此是一部‘传记’。”令人惊讶的是,尽管出现了“河流转向”(用埃文登的话来说),河流在最近的美国研究学术中却扮演了一个边缘角色。为了解决这一差距,本期RIAS汇集了来自不同学科、国家和大陆的学者,分析了美洲半球及其他地区各种各样的河流经验、历史和表征。因此,本卷的标题《美洲河流》应该被看作是对《美国河流》系列丛书(一个流行的65卷丛书,每卷讲述一条特定的美国河流,出版于1937年至1974年)的暗示,同时也提醒人们,在美国研究中,关于河流的半球、跨国和比较批判模式仍未开发的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of International American Studies
Review of International American Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信