"Covid-19 Aftermath for Educational System in Europe. The positives "

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
F. Nalaskowski
{"title":"\"Covid-19 Aftermath for Educational System in Europe. The positives \"","authors":"F. Nalaskowski","doi":"10.51917/dialogo.2023.9.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The COVID-19 pandemic has presented severe challenges for European education, forcing an adjustment to distance learning and physical school closures. Many students have encountered problems with online learning, such as a lack of access to appropriate equipment and tools. Nevertheless, the pandemic has also been an opportunity to improve the education system and introduce new, more effective solutions. These changes concern not only the material side of learning but also the psychological one. The introduction of remote learning meant the need to adapt school statutes, expenditures, and educational strategies. Many European countries have introduced additional financial support. However, many others had to cut back on their education spending, which led to financial difficulties for schools and may harm the quality of teaching. Online learning has become a mainstream teaching method but has drawbacks, such as a lack of direct contact with the teacher and peers, technical difficulties, and social isolation. Nevertheless, research shows that the effectiveness of online learning is comparable to traditional teaching, and in some subjects, it may even prove to be better. For example, studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic have not shown significant differences in teaching outcomes in Poland.\"","PeriodicalId":42179,"journal":{"name":"Dialogo","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51917/dialogo.2023.9.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"The COVID-19 pandemic has presented severe challenges for European education, forcing an adjustment to distance learning and physical school closures. Many students have encountered problems with online learning, such as a lack of access to appropriate equipment and tools. Nevertheless, the pandemic has also been an opportunity to improve the education system and introduce new, more effective solutions. These changes concern not only the material side of learning but also the psychological one. The introduction of remote learning meant the need to adapt school statutes, expenditures, and educational strategies. Many European countries have introduced additional financial support. However, many others had to cut back on their education spending, which led to financial difficulties for schools and may harm the quality of teaching. Online learning has become a mainstream teaching method but has drawbacks, such as a lack of direct contact with the teacher and peers, technical difficulties, and social isolation. Nevertheless, research shows that the effectiveness of online learning is comparable to traditional teaching, and in some subjects, it may even prove to be better. For example, studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic have not shown significant differences in teaching outcomes in Poland."
“Covid-19对欧洲教育系统的影响。积极的一面。”
“2019冠状病毒病大流行给欧洲教育带来了严峻挑战,迫使他们调整远程教育,并关闭了实体学校。许多学生都遇到了在线学习的问题,比如无法获得适当的设备和工具。然而,这次大流行也是一个改善教育制度和采用新的、更有效的解决办法的机会。这些变化不仅关系到学习的物质方面,也关系到心理方面。远程学习的引入意味着需要调整学校法规、支出和教育策略。许多欧洲国家已经提供了额外的财政支持。然而,其他许多人不得不削减他们的教育支出,这导致学校的财政困难,可能会影响教学质量。在线学习已经成为一种主流的教学方法,但也存在一些缺点,比如缺乏与老师和同龄人的直接接触,技术上的困难,以及社会隔离。然而,研究表明,在线学习的效果与传统教学相当,在某些科目上,它甚至可能被证明是更好的。例如,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间进行的研究并未显示波兰的教学成果有显着差异。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogo
Dialogo SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信