S. Mok, Jae Hoon Kim, S. Skates, J. Schorge, D. Cramer, K. Lu, C. Liew
{"title":"Use of Blood-based mRNA profiling to Identify Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer Screening","authors":"S. Mok, Jae Hoon Kim, S. Skates, J. Schorge, D. Cramer, K. Lu, C. Liew","doi":"10.4172/2161-0932.1000443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To identify candidate genomic signatures for the early detection of ovarian cancer using whole bloodbased \n gene expression profiles. \nExperimental Design: We performed Affymetrix U133Plus 2.0 GeneChip microarray analyses on whole blood \n RNA samples obtained from 14 ovarian cancer patients and 15 age-matched, healthy women. Genes differentially \n expressed were identified using a parametric Welch t-test. Real-time qRT-PCR analyses were performed on RNA \n prepared from 96 ovarian cancer patients and 83 age-matched healthy women, using primer sets specific for 14 \n genes. A Mann Whitney U test assessed individual gene significance. CA125 levels were determined in the same set \n of samples. We used logistic regression analyses and cross validation to assess the ability of linear combinations of \n specific transcripts combined with CA125 to distinguish cancer from controls. \nResults: Microarray analyses showed that 9583 probes were significantly different in blood gene expression \n profiles from healthy women as compared with those from ovarian cancer patients (p<0.05). Real-time RT-PCR \n analyses on the 96 cases and 83 controls validated 7 genes, which showed significantly different expression levels \n in cases and controls. Logistic regression analyses and cross validation identified an optimal panel of markers \n including CA125, BRCA1, and KIAA0562, that could improve the sensitivity of CA125 alone to over 90% at 98% \n specificity in the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. \nConclusion: Circulating blood gene expression profiles identified RNA markers that can improve the sensitivity \n of CA125 in the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. Further validation is warranted to confirm the clinical \n usefulness of these biomarkers.","PeriodicalId":22164,"journal":{"name":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Purpose: To identify candidate genomic signatures for the early detection of ovarian cancer using whole bloodbased
gene expression profiles.
Experimental Design: We performed Affymetrix U133Plus 2.0 GeneChip microarray analyses on whole blood
RNA samples obtained from 14 ovarian cancer patients and 15 age-matched, healthy women. Genes differentially
expressed were identified using a parametric Welch t-test. Real-time qRT-PCR analyses were performed on RNA
prepared from 96 ovarian cancer patients and 83 age-matched healthy women, using primer sets specific for 14
genes. A Mann Whitney U test assessed individual gene significance. CA125 levels were determined in the same set
of samples. We used logistic regression analyses and cross validation to assess the ability of linear combinations of
specific transcripts combined with CA125 to distinguish cancer from controls.
Results: Microarray analyses showed that 9583 probes were significantly different in blood gene expression
profiles from healthy women as compared with those from ovarian cancer patients (p<0.05). Real-time RT-PCR
analyses on the 96 cases and 83 controls validated 7 genes, which showed significantly different expression levels
in cases and controls. Logistic regression analyses and cross validation identified an optimal panel of markers
including CA125, BRCA1, and KIAA0562, that could improve the sensitivity of CA125 alone to over 90% at 98%
specificity in the detection of early stage ovarian cancer.
Conclusion: Circulating blood gene expression profiles identified RNA markers that can improve the sensitivity
of CA125 in the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. Further validation is warranted to confirm the clinical
usefulness of these biomarkers.