The ‘Feudal Revolution’ After All? A Discussion on Four Recent Books

Storicamente Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.12977/stor809
Lorenzo Tabarrini
{"title":"The ‘Feudal Revolution’ After All? A Discussion on Four Recent Books","authors":"Lorenzo Tabarrini","doi":"10.12977/stor809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses four books published during the 2010s, which address – directly or indirectly – the problem of the ‘feudal revolution’; that is, the break-up of the Carolingian structures of political power that is said to have taken place all across western Europe at some point between the early and the central medieval period, leading to the creation of localised lordships. This interpretative framework was seriously challenged in the early 1990s, when Dominique Barthelemy and other historians argued that the sharp distinction between Carolingian ‘public order’ and ‘feudal’ lordships was ill-conceived. The article shows how the books by Charles West, Alessio Fiore, Nicolas Schroeder and Maria Elena Cortese have contributed – and might further contribute – to this debate.","PeriodicalId":29985,"journal":{"name":"Storicamente","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Storicamente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12977/stor809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses four books published during the 2010s, which address – directly or indirectly – the problem of the ‘feudal revolution’; that is, the break-up of the Carolingian structures of political power that is said to have taken place all across western Europe at some point between the early and the central medieval period, leading to the creation of localised lordships. This interpretative framework was seriously challenged in the early 1990s, when Dominique Barthelemy and other historians argued that the sharp distinction between Carolingian ‘public order’ and ‘feudal’ lordships was ill-conceived. The article shows how the books by Charles West, Alessio Fiore, Nicolas Schroeder and Maria Elena Cortese have contributed – and might further contribute – to this debate.
“封建革命”到底是什么?论最近出版的四本书
本文讨论了2010年代出版的四本书,它们直接或间接地讨论了“封建革命”的问题;也就是说,加洛林王朝政治权力结构的瓦解据说在中世纪早期到中期的某个时间点发生在整个西欧,导致了地方领主的产生。这种解释框架在20世纪90年代初受到了严重挑战,当时多米尼克·巴泰勒米和其他历史学家认为,加洛林王朝的"公共秩序"和"封建"领主之间的明显区别是错误的。这篇文章展示了查尔斯·韦斯特、阿莱西奥·菲奥雷、尼古拉斯·施罗德和玛丽亚·埃琳娜·科蒂斯的书是如何为这场辩论做出贡献的——而且可能会进一步做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信