Validation of a Single-Time-Point Measurement of Total Abdominal Counts to Simplify Small Bowel and Colon Transit Analyses

A. Maurer, Rahul Parupalli, Perry Orthey, H. Parkman
{"title":"Validation of a Single-Time-Point Measurement of Total Abdominal Counts to Simplify Small Bowel and Colon Transit Analyses","authors":"A. Maurer, Rahul Parupalli, Perry Orthey, H. Parkman","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.116.183368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guide on gastrointestinal transit currently indicates that the mean of total abdominal counts of 7 time points (0–360 min) is used to define the total abdominal counts for bowel transit studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the variability of total abdominal counts during the initial 6 h of bowel transit and to determine whether a simplified, single-time-point measurement can be used. Methods: Thirty consecutive bowel transit studies were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received an oral dose of 4.6 MBq (125 μCi) of 111In-DTPA in 300 cc of water together with a standard egg white solid-phase, gastric-emptying meal to measure small bowel and colon transit. 111In-DTPA geometric mean and decay-corrected total abdominal counts obtained at 0, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min after meal ingestion were analyzed. The coefficient of variation was used to determine the variability of the mean total abdominal counts. Slope of the regression line, Student t test, and a Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PCC) were also calculated to determine the correlation of total abdominal counts at each time point compared with the mean of all time points. Results: The mean coefficient of variation of total abdominal counts of each patient was 3.3%, with a range of 1.1%–6.3%. The mean of the slope of the regression line of the total abdominal counts of the patients was −0.001 ± 0.003. There was no significant difference between the measured slope of the regression line compared with a line with a slope of 0 (P > 0.05). When the counts at each time were compared with the mean counts, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). The PCC of each of the counts showed a significant and strong correlation between each interval and the mean total abdominal counts (P < 0.01). Conclusion: There is no significant variability in geometric mean 111In-DTPA total abdominal counts during the initial 6 h of bowel transit studies. This can permit a more simplified analysis using the total abdominal counts from only a single time point.","PeriodicalId":22799,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","volume":"14 1","pages":"239 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.183368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guide on gastrointestinal transit currently indicates that the mean of total abdominal counts of 7 time points (0–360 min) is used to define the total abdominal counts for bowel transit studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the variability of total abdominal counts during the initial 6 h of bowel transit and to determine whether a simplified, single-time-point measurement can be used. Methods: Thirty consecutive bowel transit studies were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received an oral dose of 4.6 MBq (125 μCi) of 111In-DTPA in 300 cc of water together with a standard egg white solid-phase, gastric-emptying meal to measure small bowel and colon transit. 111In-DTPA geometric mean and decay-corrected total abdominal counts obtained at 0, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min after meal ingestion were analyzed. The coefficient of variation was used to determine the variability of the mean total abdominal counts. Slope of the regression line, Student t test, and a Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PCC) were also calculated to determine the correlation of total abdominal counts at each time point compared with the mean of all time points. Results: The mean coefficient of variation of total abdominal counts of each patient was 3.3%, with a range of 1.1%–6.3%. The mean of the slope of the regression line of the total abdominal counts of the patients was −0.001 ± 0.003. There was no significant difference between the measured slope of the regression line compared with a line with a slope of 0 (P > 0.05). When the counts at each time were compared with the mean counts, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). The PCC of each of the counts showed a significant and strong correlation between each interval and the mean total abdominal counts (P < 0.01). Conclusion: There is no significant variability in geometric mean 111In-DTPA total abdominal counts during the initial 6 h of bowel transit studies. This can permit a more simplified analysis using the total abdominal counts from only a single time point.
验证单时间点测量总腹部计数以简化小肠和结肠运输分析
核医学与分子成像学会和欧洲核医学协会胃肠运输程序指南目前指出,在肠运输研究中,使用7个时间点(0-360分钟)的腹部总计数的平均值来定义腹部总计数。本研究的目的是研究肠道运输最初6小时内腹部总计数的变异性,并确定是否可以使用简化的单时间点测量方法。方法:回顾性分析30例连续肠转运研究。患者口服剂量为4.6 MBq (125 μCi)的111In-DTPA,并将其加入300毫升水中,同时服用标准蛋清固相空胃餐,以测量小肠和结肠的运输情况。111 .对进食后0、30、60、120、180、240、300和360分钟的in - dtpa几何平均值和经腐烂校正的腹部总计数进行分析。变异系数用于确定平均总腹部计数的变异性。还计算了回归线斜率、Student t检验和Pearson积差相关系数(PCC),以确定每个时间点的总腹部计数与所有时间点平均值的相关性。结果:各患者腹部总计数的平均变异系数为3.3%,范围为1.1% ~ 6.3%。患者腹部总计数回归线斜率的平均值为- 0.001±0.003。回归线的实测斜率与斜率为0的回归线比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。各时间点计数与平均计数比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。各时间间隔各计数的PCC与平均腹部总计数呈极显著强相关(P < 0.01)。结论:在肠运输研究的最初6小时内,几何平均111In-DTPA总腹部计数无显著变化。这样可以使用单个时间点的总腹部计数进行更简化的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信