{"title":"Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique","authors":"Marjan Ivkovic, Srdjan Prodanovic, M. Urosevic","doi":"10.2298/FID2101011I","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents three interconnected examinations of Asger S?rensen?s\n arguments in Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, which thematize S?rensen?s\n overarching understanding of the relationship between theory and practice:\n his general methodological perspective on critical theory, its distinctive\n epistemology and its anchoring in the empirical world. The paper authors\n each try to push S?rensen on these crucial points by considering how\n S?rensen?s variant of critical theory actually operates, scrutinizing in\n more detail the particular relationship between the ?experience of\n injustice?, which for S?rensen constitutes the empirical foothold for\n critical theory, and the theoretical diagnosis of social reality which the\n critical theorist should formulate against the backdrop of this experience.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101011I","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents three interconnected examinations of Asger S?rensen?s
arguments in Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, which thematize S?rensen?s
overarching understanding of the relationship between theory and practice:
his general methodological perspective on critical theory, its distinctive
epistemology and its anchoring in the empirical world. The paper authors
each try to push S?rensen on these crucial points by considering how
S?rensen?s variant of critical theory actually operates, scrutinizing in
more detail the particular relationship between the ?experience of
injustice?, which for S?rensen constitutes the empirical foothold for
critical theory, and the theoretical diagnosis of social reality which the
critical theorist should formulate against the backdrop of this experience.