Perineal stapled prolapse resection: A csse report

D. Vasic, Valentina Isakovic, M. Sekulić, D. Ivanov
{"title":"Perineal stapled prolapse resection: A csse report","authors":"D. Vasic, Valentina Isakovic, M. Sekulić, D. Ivanov","doi":"10.2298/mpns2210317v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Over 100 different surgical procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse have been described. Since these patients commonly have associated comorbidities, methods of choice include surgical techniques with a perineal approach, such as perineal stapled rectal resection. Case Report. A 77-year-old female patient presented with a complete rectal prolapse measuring 12 cm in length. Considering the associated comorbidities and the patient?s age, perineal stapled rectal resection was chosen as the surgical modality. She underwent surgery under general anesthesia in the dorsal decubitus and slightly reverse-Trendelenburg position. The surgery lasted 35 minutes. The surgery and the immediate postoperative course were uneventful. At the follow-up examination, six months after surgery, the findings were normal, without local recurrence. There was a slight deterioration of fecal incontinence, with a Vaizey score 10/20, but the patient tolerated it well. Discussion. The perineal stapled rectal resection technique has fewer intraoperative complications and 6.3% fewer postoperative complications compared to classic perineal procedures (staple line bleeding, anastomotic stenosis, pelvic hematoma, sigmoid colon perforation, perirectal abscesses and rectovaginal fistulas), which were reported in many studies. However, patients with longer postoperative followup demonstrated a higher recurrence rate compared to patients who underwent other surgical techniques with an abdominal approach. Conclusion. The perineal stapled rectal resection procedure is easy to perform and acceptable for the elderly patients with associated comorbidities, who are not candidates for other surgical techniques with abdominal approach.","PeriodicalId":87940,"journal":{"name":"Calcutta medical review","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Calcutta medical review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/mpns2210317v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Over 100 different surgical procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse have been described. Since these patients commonly have associated comorbidities, methods of choice include surgical techniques with a perineal approach, such as perineal stapled rectal resection. Case Report. A 77-year-old female patient presented with a complete rectal prolapse measuring 12 cm in length. Considering the associated comorbidities and the patient?s age, perineal stapled rectal resection was chosen as the surgical modality. She underwent surgery under general anesthesia in the dorsal decubitus and slightly reverse-Trendelenburg position. The surgery lasted 35 minutes. The surgery and the immediate postoperative course were uneventful. At the follow-up examination, six months after surgery, the findings were normal, without local recurrence. There was a slight deterioration of fecal incontinence, with a Vaizey score 10/20, but the patient tolerated it well. Discussion. The perineal stapled rectal resection technique has fewer intraoperative complications and 6.3% fewer postoperative complications compared to classic perineal procedures (staple line bleeding, anastomotic stenosis, pelvic hematoma, sigmoid colon perforation, perirectal abscesses and rectovaginal fistulas), which were reported in many studies. However, patients with longer postoperative followup demonstrated a higher recurrence rate compared to patients who underwent other surgical techniques with an abdominal approach. Conclusion. The perineal stapled rectal resection procedure is easy to perform and acceptable for the elderly patients with associated comorbidities, who are not candidates for other surgical techniques with abdominal approach.
会阴钉状脱垂切除术:一例病例报告
介绍。超过100种不同的手术程序治疗直肠脱垂已被描述。由于这些患者通常有相关的合并症,选择的方法包括手术技术与会阴入路,如会阴钉直肠切除术。病例报告。一个77岁的女性病人提出了一个完整的直肠脱垂测量长度12厘米。考虑到相关的合并症和患者?50岁时选择会阴直肠吻合术作为手术方式。患者在全身麻醉下采用背卧位和稍反的trendelenburg位进行手术。手术持续了35分钟。手术和术后的过程都很顺利。术后6个月随访检查结果正常,无局部复发。大便失禁轻微恶化,Vaizey评分为10/20,但患者耐受性良好。讨论。会阴吻合器直肠切除术术中并发症少,术后并发症(吻合器线出血、吻合口狭窄、盆腔血肿、乙状结肠穿孔、直肠周围脓肿、直肠阴道瘘)比传统会阴手术少6.3%,相关研究较多报道。然而,术后随访时间较长的患者与接受其他腹部入路手术技术的患者相比,复发率更高。结论。会阴直肠吻合术对于有相关合并症的老年患者容易操作且可接受,这些患者不适合其他腹部入路手术技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信