Nuptial symbolics beyond the law: constructions of religion and sexuality in debates on the legalization of same-sex marriage

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
M. Derks, R. Ganzevoort, A. Korte
{"title":"Nuptial symbolics beyond the law: constructions of religion and sexuality in debates on the legalization of same-sex marriage","authors":"M. Derks, R. Ganzevoort, A. Korte","doi":"10.1080/13558358.2017.1351122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the turn of the century, a growing number of (Western) states have legalized samesex marriage (e.g. the Netherlands 2001, Belgium 2003, Spain 2005, Canada 2005, South Africa 2006, Sweden 2009, France 2013) or are about to do so. The intense public debates that often precede – and sometimes follow – these processes indicate that this is not merely an issue of granting equal rights to citizens who ‘happen’ to be non-heterosexual. For both opponents and proponents, the idea of same-sex marriage seems to be heavy with symbolism. Public debates tend to reduce this host of cultural meanings or connotations to the familiar split between ‘religion’ and ‘secularism’. This often proves to be a self-fulfilling prophecy, since the very proposition of legalizing same-sex marriage can ignite a ‘culture war’. On closer examination, however, many more than just two voices can be heard. Some religious groups (notably liberal Protestant and Jewish denominations) have solemnized same-sex relationships since the mid-1980s, whereas legalization has met with strong opposition not only in secular (e.g. post-communist) societies, but also in some more radical LGBT or queer circles. Public turmoil about this issue brings to light that even to those citizens who cherish the division of Church and State, marriage is not just a matter of rights, but of rituals. The latter bring along a host of cultural, transcendent associations, cutting across the religious-secular divide. Debates on same-sex marriage thus reveal a multitude of discursive constructions of marriage beyond the law. In order to comprehend these varied symbolic exchanges, an in-depth historical, crosscultural analysis of the discursive strategies that are being employed in the proposition of, and in opposition to, same-sex marriage is needed. This special issue – consisting of three main articles and two response articles – aims at contributing to such an analysis by zooming in into debates, past and present, in particular in the Netherlands and Sweden, and to a lesser extent in the United States. Both the Netherlands and Sweden are known for their high level of social acceptance of homosexuality, whereas in the United States social acceptance seems to be increasing as well. Moreover, these countries differ in their religious – and political – configurations. The articles in this issue aim at highlighting how in discourses on same-sex marriage, specific conceptualizations of both religion and homosexuality – notably in terms of individual vs. relational, public","PeriodicalId":42039,"journal":{"name":"Theology & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2017.1351122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the turn of the century, a growing number of (Western) states have legalized samesex marriage (e.g. the Netherlands 2001, Belgium 2003, Spain 2005, Canada 2005, South Africa 2006, Sweden 2009, France 2013) or are about to do so. The intense public debates that often precede – and sometimes follow – these processes indicate that this is not merely an issue of granting equal rights to citizens who ‘happen’ to be non-heterosexual. For both opponents and proponents, the idea of same-sex marriage seems to be heavy with symbolism. Public debates tend to reduce this host of cultural meanings or connotations to the familiar split between ‘religion’ and ‘secularism’. This often proves to be a self-fulfilling prophecy, since the very proposition of legalizing same-sex marriage can ignite a ‘culture war’. On closer examination, however, many more than just two voices can be heard. Some religious groups (notably liberal Protestant and Jewish denominations) have solemnized same-sex relationships since the mid-1980s, whereas legalization has met with strong opposition not only in secular (e.g. post-communist) societies, but also in some more radical LGBT or queer circles. Public turmoil about this issue brings to light that even to those citizens who cherish the division of Church and State, marriage is not just a matter of rights, but of rituals. The latter bring along a host of cultural, transcendent associations, cutting across the religious-secular divide. Debates on same-sex marriage thus reveal a multitude of discursive constructions of marriage beyond the law. In order to comprehend these varied symbolic exchanges, an in-depth historical, crosscultural analysis of the discursive strategies that are being employed in the proposition of, and in opposition to, same-sex marriage is needed. This special issue – consisting of three main articles and two response articles – aims at contributing to such an analysis by zooming in into debates, past and present, in particular in the Netherlands and Sweden, and to a lesser extent in the United States. Both the Netherlands and Sweden are known for their high level of social acceptance of homosexuality, whereas in the United States social acceptance seems to be increasing as well. Moreover, these countries differ in their religious – and political – configurations. The articles in this issue aim at highlighting how in discourses on same-sex marriage, specific conceptualizations of both religion and homosexuality – notably in terms of individual vs. relational, public
超越法律的婚姻象征:同性婚姻合法化辩论中的宗教与性建构
自世纪之交以来,越来越多的(西方)国家已经将同性婚姻合法化(如荷兰2001年,比利时2003年,西班牙2005年,加拿大2005年,南非2006年,瑞典2009年,法国2013年)或即将这样做。在这些过程之前——有时是之后——经常出现的激烈的公开辩论表明,这不仅仅是一个给予“碰巧”是非异性恋公民平等权利的问题。对于反对者和支持者来说,同性婚姻的概念似乎充满了象征意义。公共辩论倾向于将这一系列文化意义或内涵简化为“宗教”和“世俗主义”之间熟悉的分裂。这往往被证明是一个自我实现的预言,因为同性婚姻合法化的命题本身就可以点燃一场“文化战争”。然而,仔细观察,可以听到的声音远不止两种。自20世纪80年代中期以来,一些宗教团体(尤其是自由的新教和犹太教派)已经将同性关系庄严地合法化,而合法化不仅在世俗(如后共产主义)社会中遭到强烈反对,而且在一些更激进的LGBT或酷儿圈子中也遭到了强烈反对。公众对这一问题的骚动表明,即使对那些珍视政教分离的公民来说,婚姻也不仅仅是权利问题,而是仪式问题。后者带来了大量的文化、超越的联想,跨越了宗教与世俗的鸿沟。因此,关于同性婚姻的辩论揭示了法律之外对婚姻的大量话语建构。为了理解这些不同的符号交换,有必要对同性婚姻的主张和反对所采用的话语策略进行深入的历史、跨文化分析。本期特刊由三篇主要文章和两篇回应文章组成,旨在通过聚焦过去和现在的辩论,特别是在荷兰和瑞典,以及在较小程度上在美国的辩论,为这种分析作出贡献。荷兰和瑞典都以其对同性恋的高度社会接受度而闻名,而在美国,社会接受度似乎也在增加。此外,这些国家的宗教和政治结构也各不相同。本期的文章旨在强调在关于同性婚姻的论述中,宗教和同性恋的具体概念——特别是在个人vs.关系,公共方面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信