Evaluation of Sternal Bone Healing with Computed Tomography and a Quantitative Scoring Algorithm

G. Stacy, Osmanuddin Ahmed, A. Richardson, Brian M. Hatcher, H. MacMahon, J. Raman
{"title":"Evaluation of Sternal Bone Healing with Computed Tomography and a Quantitative Scoring Algorithm","authors":"G. Stacy, Osmanuddin Ahmed, A. Richardson, Brian M. Hatcher, H. MacMahon, J. Raman","doi":"10.2174/1874347101408010029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The exquisite bone detail offered by computed tomography makes it the ideal modality for evaluation of bone healing. However, few studies have investigated the normal computed tomographic appearance of the sternum after median sternotomy and, to the best of our knowledge, no computed tomographic classification of sternal healing has been proposed. Given the potential benefit of objective criteria, we propose a validated scoring classification of sternal healing using computed tomography for both clinical and investigational purposes. Methods: Computed tomography scans from 20 patients who underwent a median sternotomy were evaluated for sternal healing at either 3 or 6 months postoperatively. Five anatomic locations along the sternum were selected using defined criteria, and a 6-point quantitative scale was developed to evaluate sternal healing. Independent radiologists read and scored each of the 5 locations on the sternum. Inter- and intra-observer variability was assessed by calculating the kappa statistics to measure the reliability of the scoring algorithm. Results: Calculation of the kappa statistics indicated substantial agreement for intra-observer variability and substantial to almost perfect agreement for inter-observer variability. For intra-observer variability, the kappa statistics ranged from 0.591 to 0.802, and for inter-observer variability, the kappa statistics ranged from 0.590 to 0.969. When the two radiologists differed, the magnitude of the difference was no more than 1 or 2 points. Conclusion: This simple system of evaluating sternal healing had high inter- and intra-observer reliability. Therefore, it may be considered a valid method for assessing sternal osteosynthesis for both clinical and investigative purposes. Ultramini abstract: (49 words): Few studies have investigated the normal computed tomography appearance of the sternum after median sternotomy, and we knew of no computed tomography-based classification of sternal healing. Given the potential benefit of objective criteria, we designed and validated a scoring classification of sternal osteosynthesis for both clinical and investigational purposes.","PeriodicalId":90366,"journal":{"name":"The open medical imaging journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open medical imaging journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874347101408010029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Objective: The exquisite bone detail offered by computed tomography makes it the ideal modality for evaluation of bone healing. However, few studies have investigated the normal computed tomographic appearance of the sternum after median sternotomy and, to the best of our knowledge, no computed tomographic classification of sternal healing has been proposed. Given the potential benefit of objective criteria, we propose a validated scoring classification of sternal healing using computed tomography for both clinical and investigational purposes. Methods: Computed tomography scans from 20 patients who underwent a median sternotomy were evaluated for sternal healing at either 3 or 6 months postoperatively. Five anatomic locations along the sternum were selected using defined criteria, and a 6-point quantitative scale was developed to evaluate sternal healing. Independent radiologists read and scored each of the 5 locations on the sternum. Inter- and intra-observer variability was assessed by calculating the kappa statistics to measure the reliability of the scoring algorithm. Results: Calculation of the kappa statistics indicated substantial agreement for intra-observer variability and substantial to almost perfect agreement for inter-observer variability. For intra-observer variability, the kappa statistics ranged from 0.591 to 0.802, and for inter-observer variability, the kappa statistics ranged from 0.590 to 0.969. When the two radiologists differed, the magnitude of the difference was no more than 1 or 2 points. Conclusion: This simple system of evaluating sternal healing had high inter- and intra-observer reliability. Therefore, it may be considered a valid method for assessing sternal osteosynthesis for both clinical and investigative purposes. Ultramini abstract: (49 words): Few studies have investigated the normal computed tomography appearance of the sternum after median sternotomy, and we knew of no computed tomography-based classification of sternal healing. Given the potential benefit of objective criteria, we designed and validated a scoring classification of sternal osteosynthesis for both clinical and investigational purposes.
用计算机断层扫描和定量评分算法评价胸骨愈合
目的:计算机断层扫描提供了精细的骨骼细节,使其成为评估骨愈合的理想方式。然而,很少有研究调查胸骨正中切开术后胸骨的正常计算机断层表现,据我们所知,没有提出胸骨愈合的计算机断层分类。考虑到客观标准的潜在好处,我们提出了一种有效的胸骨愈合评分分类,用于临床和研究目的。方法:对20例胸骨正中切开术患者进行计算机断层扫描,评估术后3或6个月胸骨愈合情况。根据确定的标准选择胸骨沿线的五个解剖位置,并制定了6点定量量表来评估胸骨愈合。独立放射科医生阅读并评分胸骨上的5个位置。通过计算kappa统计量来评估观察者之间和观察者内部的可变性,以衡量评分算法的可靠性。结果:kappa统计数据的计算表明观察者内部变异性和观察者之间变异性的基本一致,几乎完全一致。观察者内部变异的kappa统计量为0.591 ~ 0.802,观察者间变异的kappa统计量为0.590 ~ 0.969。当两位放射科医生的诊断结果不同时,差异的幅度不超过1或2分。结论:这个简单的评估胸骨愈合的系统在观察者之间和观察者内部具有很高的可靠性。因此,它可以被认为是一种有效的评估胸骨骨整合的方法,用于临床和研究目的。摘要(49个词):很少有研究调查胸骨正中切开术后胸骨的正常计算机断层表现,我们也不知道胸骨愈合的计算机断层分类。考虑到客观标准的潜在益处,我们为临床和研究目的设计并验证了胸骨植骨评分分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信