The Man of Science as an Intellectual: The Public Mission of Scientist

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
Udc, O. Kubalskyi, Marlon Brando, B. Dylan, R. Waters
{"title":"The Man of Science as an Intellectual: The Public Mission of Scientist","authors":"Udc, O. Kubalskyi, Marlon Brando, B. Dylan, R. Waters","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The paper is aimed at identifying the ways of scientist’s influence on the development of modern society as compared to those of intellectuals. Theoretical basis. The socio-anthropological approach to the role of scientists in post-industrial society shows the leading role of people of science as a social group in present-day society. However, philosophical axiology reveals that scientists in today’s society do not have the appropriate social status: neither in state governance nor in the sphere of forming public opinion. The classical doctrine concerning intellectuals has suffered a crisis in recent decades, which is due to the growing gap between the group of intellectuals recognized by society and the sphere of science. A new theoretical approach to determining the role of present-day research scientists as intellectuals is necessary. Originality. Successful development of modern society in conditions of growing social turbulence necessitates the access of research scientists to the sphere of public communication. This is required both by the needs of science advancement itself – to receive its adequate funding and win wide public recognition, and by society’s needs – as it is scientists who can provide reliable diagnostics of social problems and formulate well-grounded programs for overcoming them. Conclusions. For overcoming social barriers and getting access to public space, scientists themselves have to recognize themselves as a destitute social group – those who are unfairly deprived of making principal decisions in today’s society. For that, scientists should become modern intellectuals. Unlike media intellectuals, scientists are to interact not with social masses but, first and foremost, with public elites. The scientist has to gain his/her independent status by achieving the recognition of his/her own ideas among social elites rather than by winning wide personal popularity. Hence, scientists must aim at obtaining the status of the elite for elites – this would reveal in scientists the deepest potential of a modern man.","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The paper is aimed at identifying the ways of scientist’s influence on the development of modern society as compared to those of intellectuals. Theoretical basis. The socio-anthropological approach to the role of scientists in post-industrial society shows the leading role of people of science as a social group in present-day society. However, philosophical axiology reveals that scientists in today’s society do not have the appropriate social status: neither in state governance nor in the sphere of forming public opinion. The classical doctrine concerning intellectuals has suffered a crisis in recent decades, which is due to the growing gap between the group of intellectuals recognized by society and the sphere of science. A new theoretical approach to determining the role of present-day research scientists as intellectuals is necessary. Originality. Successful development of modern society in conditions of growing social turbulence necessitates the access of research scientists to the sphere of public communication. This is required both by the needs of science advancement itself – to receive its adequate funding and win wide public recognition, and by society’s needs – as it is scientists who can provide reliable diagnostics of social problems and formulate well-grounded programs for overcoming them. Conclusions. For overcoming social barriers and getting access to public space, scientists themselves have to recognize themselves as a destitute social group – those who are unfairly deprived of making principal decisions in today’s society. For that, scientists should become modern intellectuals. Unlike media intellectuals, scientists are to interact not with social masses but, first and foremost, with public elites. The scientist has to gain his/her independent status by achieving the recognition of his/her own ideas among social elites rather than by winning wide personal popularity. Hence, scientists must aim at obtaining the status of the elite for elites – this would reveal in scientists the deepest potential of a modern man.
作为知识分子的科学人:科学家的公共使命
目的。本文的目的是找出科学家对现代社会发展的影响方式,而不是知识分子的影响方式。理论基础。对后工业社会中科学家角色的社会人类学研究表明,科学人作为一个社会群体在当今社会中发挥着主导作用。然而,哲学价值论揭示,当今社会的科学家没有适当的社会地位:无论是在国家治理领域还是在形成舆论领域。近几十年来,关于知识分子的经典学说遭遇了危机,这是由于社会认可的知识分子群体与科学领域之间的差距越来越大。需要一种新的理论方法来确定当今研究科学家作为知识分子的作用。创意。在社会动荡日益加剧的条件下,现代社会的成功发展需要研究科学家进入公共传播领域。这既是科学进步本身的需要——获得足够的资金并赢得广泛的公众认可——也是社会的需要——因为正是科学家能够对社会问题提供可靠的诊断,并制定有充分根据的方案来克服这些问题。结论。为了克服社会障碍和进入公共空间,科学家自己必须认识到自己是一个贫困的社会群体——那些在当今社会中被不公平地剥夺了做出主要决策的人。为此,科学家应该成为现代知识分子。与媒体知识分子不同,科学家不是与社会大众互动,而是首先与公共精英互动。科学家要获得自己的独立地位,靠的不是赢得广泛的个人声望,而是让自己的思想得到社会精英的认可。因此,科学家必须致力于为精英获得精英的地位——这将在科学家身上揭示出现代人最深刻的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信