Drawing out: Encounter, resistance and collaboration

Q3 Arts and Humanities
M. Clancy, S. Felmingham
{"title":"Drawing out: Encounter, resistance and collaboration","authors":"M. Clancy, S. Felmingham","doi":"10.1386/drtp_00008_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This collaborative paper is written against the backdrop of a current crisis in art education and provision in UK secondary schools. Education policy and the introduction of the European Baccalaureate (EBacc) has led to an increasing decline in the hours of arts\n teaching and number of arts teachers in England's secondary schools (Cultural Learning Alliance 2018). The results of this educational turn are well documented and the effects are being felt now in higher education, in wider culture and in the outcomes for young people in their creative capabilities,\n global outlook and wellbeing. Drawing pedagogy is considered with reference to this wider context and through the lens of Gert Biesta's philosophy of education that brings children and young people into dialogue with the world. It juxtaposes Tim Ingold and John Dewey in a discussion of a collaborative\n drawing project, Ailleurs (Elsewhere), an exchange between Plymouth College of Art (PCA) and Ecole Supérieure des Beaux-Arts Montpellier Contemporain (MoCo ESBA) in 2017. The intention is to bring a pedagogy of collaboration, resistance and encounters to bear, to argue for drawing\n as a singular means of working within this set of tensions. The text concludes that as research or enquiry-led teaching is at the root of an increasing amount of University teaching, finding a route into this from results-led education is a clear challenge to higher education and it sets out\n a collaborative, peer-to-peer learning strategy as an approach to drawing pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":36057,"journal":{"name":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00008_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This collaborative paper is written against the backdrop of a current crisis in art education and provision in UK secondary schools. Education policy and the introduction of the European Baccalaureate (EBacc) has led to an increasing decline in the hours of arts teaching and number of arts teachers in England's secondary schools (Cultural Learning Alliance 2018). The results of this educational turn are well documented and the effects are being felt now in higher education, in wider culture and in the outcomes for young people in their creative capabilities, global outlook and wellbeing. Drawing pedagogy is considered with reference to this wider context and through the lens of Gert Biesta's philosophy of education that brings children and young people into dialogue with the world. It juxtaposes Tim Ingold and John Dewey in a discussion of a collaborative drawing project, Ailleurs (Elsewhere), an exchange between Plymouth College of Art (PCA) and Ecole Supérieure des Beaux-Arts Montpellier Contemporain (MoCo ESBA) in 2017. The intention is to bring a pedagogy of collaboration, resistance and encounters to bear, to argue for drawing as a singular means of working within this set of tensions. The text concludes that as research or enquiry-led teaching is at the root of an increasing amount of University teaching, finding a route into this from results-led education is a clear challenge to higher education and it sets out a collaborative, peer-to-peer learning strategy as an approach to drawing pedagogy.
引出:相遇、抵抗和合作
摘要:这篇合作论文是在英国中学艺术教育和提供当前危机的背景下写的。教育政策和欧洲学士学位(EBacc)的引入导致英国中学艺术教学时间和艺术教师数量的日益减少(文化学习联盟2018)。这种教育转变的结果有据可考,其影响正在高等教育、更广泛的文化以及年轻人的创造能力、全球视野和福祉方面得到体现。绘画教育学在更广泛的背景下被考虑,并通过Gert Biesta的教育哲学的镜头,将儿童和年轻人带入与世界的对话。在2017年普利茅斯艺术学院(PCA)和蒙彼利埃当代美术学院(MoCo ESBA)的合作绘画项目Ailleurs(其他地方)的讨论中,Tim Ingold和John Dewey并列出现。其目的是将一种合作、抵抗和遭遇的教学法引入人们的视野,并主张在这种紧张局势下,绘画是一种独特的工作方式。文章的结论是,由于研究或探究型教学是越来越多的大学教学的根本,从结果导向型教育中找到一条通往这一方向的道路对高等教育来说是一个明显的挑战,它提出了一种协作的、点对点的学习策略,作为一种绘画教学法的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信