Lead Jurisdiction Concepts: Prospects and Limits for Rationalizing International Competition Policy Enforcement

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS

Global Economy Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1515/gej-2016-0025

Oliver Budzinski

引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Lead jurisdiction models represent one option how to extend and enhance contemporary interagency cooperation among competition policy regimes. They constitute a multilateral, case-related form of cooperation that is suited to effectively create a one-stop-shop for the prosecution of international cartels, the handling of cross-border mergers and acquisitions and the governance of international antitrust cases. Thus, lead jurisdiction models offer considerable economic benefits. However, they also entail several caveats. Three possible working problems and downside effects of lead jurisdiction models in international competition policy enforcement are discussed in this paper.

查看原文本刊更多论文

主导管辖权概念:国际竞争政策执行合理化的前景与局限

领导管辖模式代表了如何扩展和加强当代竞争政策机制之间的机构间合作的一种选择。它们构成了一种与案件有关的多边合作形式，适合于有效地为起诉国际卡特尔、处理跨境并购和治理国际反垄断案件建立一站式服务。因此，领先的管辖模式提供了可观的经济效益。然而，它们也需要一些注意事项。本文讨论了主导管辖权模式在国际竞争政策执行中可能存在的三个工作问题及其不利影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Global Economy Journal ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The GEJ seeks to publish original and innovative research, as well as novel analysis, relating to the global economy. While its main emphasis is economic, the GEJ is a multi-disciplinary journal. The GEJ''s contents mirror the diverse interests and approaches of scholars involved with the international dimensions of business, economics, finance, history, law, marketing, management, political science, and related areas. The GEJ also welcomes scholarly contributions from officials with government agencies, international agencies, and non-governmental organizations. One over-arching theme that unites IT&FA members and gives focus to this journal is the complex globalization process, involving flows of goods and services, money, people, and information.