A retrospective study showing the extent of compliance with perioperative guidelines in patients with coronary stents with regard to double antiplatelet therapy.

Austin A. Woolard, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, S. Eagle, J. Wanderer
{"title":"A retrospective study showing the extent of compliance with perioperative guidelines in patients with coronary stents with regard to double antiplatelet therapy.","authors":"Austin A. Woolard, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, S. Eagle, J. Wanderer","doi":"10.1097/SA.0000000000000283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy management in patients with previously placed coronary stents.\n\n\nDESIGN\nRetrospective medical record review.\n\n\nSETTING\nAcademic medical center.\n\n\nPATIENTS\nA total of 1891 surgical cases performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in 2012 were evaluated using a perioperative database. Of these, 161 had complete data records that were evaluated using 2 evidence-based and expert opinion-supported protocols.\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nN/A.\n\n\nMEASUREMENTS\nThis study is meant to evaluate perioperative antiplatelet management decisions in patients with coronary stents.\n\n\nMAIN RESULTS\nManagement decisions were consistent with guidelines regarding antiplatelet therapy in 13% (21/161) of patients. Of the 87% (140/161) of cases where decisions were not consistent, 88% (123/140) were due to discontinuing aspirin preoperatively when there was not a high risk of surgical bleeding.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis study revealed suboptimal adherence to current perioperative antiplatelet management guidelines in patients with coronary stents. The lack of adherence to current guidelines is concerning and could be used to support the notion of an anesthesiologist-led Perioperative Surgical Home.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SA.0000000000000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy management in patients with previously placed coronary stents. DESIGN Retrospective medical record review. SETTING Academic medical center. PATIENTS A total of 1891 surgical cases performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in 2012 were evaluated using a perioperative database. Of these, 161 had complete data records that were evaluated using 2 evidence-based and expert opinion-supported protocols. INTERVENTIONS N/A. MEASUREMENTS This study is meant to evaluate perioperative antiplatelet management decisions in patients with coronary stents. MAIN RESULTS Management decisions were consistent with guidelines regarding antiplatelet therapy in 13% (21/161) of patients. Of the 87% (140/161) of cases where decisions were not consistent, 88% (123/140) were due to discontinuing aspirin preoperatively when there was not a high risk of surgical bleeding. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed suboptimal adherence to current perioperative antiplatelet management guidelines in patients with coronary stents. The lack of adherence to current guidelines is concerning and could be used to support the notion of an anesthesiologist-led Perioperative Surgical Home.
一项回顾性研究显示在双重抗血小板治疗方面,冠状动脉支架患者围手术期指南的依从性程度。
研究目的评价已置放冠脉支架患者围手术期双重抗血小板治疗的管理。设计回顾性病历回顾。学术医疗中心。采用围手术期数据库对2012年范德比尔特大学医学中心共1891例手术病例进行评估。其中,161例具有完整的数据记录,采用两种循证和专家意见支持的方案进行评估。本研究旨在评估冠状动脉支架患者围手术期的抗血小板管理决策。主要结果13%(21/161)患者的管理决策与抗血小板治疗指南一致。在决定不一致的87%(140/161)病例中,88%(123/140)是由于术前在手术出血风险不高的情况下停用阿司匹林所致。结论:本研究显示,冠状动脉支架患者对当前围手术期抗血小板管理指南的依从性不佳。缺乏对现行指导方针的遵守是值得关注的,可以用来支持麻醉师主导的围手术期外科之家的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信