Adjuvant concurrent docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer: The TEC regimen. A retrospective analysis

S. Galdy, D. Zenoni, A. Galmozzi, C. Mauri, S. Cazzaniga
{"title":"Adjuvant concurrent docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer: The TEC regimen. A retrospective analysis","authors":"S. Galdy, D. Zenoni, A. Galmozzi, C. Mauri, S. Cazzaniga","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2014-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of taxanes and anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer is well established, with benefit in both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Several studies demonstrated that the addition of taxanes to anthracycline-based chemotherapy improves the outcome in either concurrent or sequential schedule. Nowadays, the TAC regimen (docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) is a standard treatment in both node-positive and high-risk node-negative early breast cancer. Doxorubicin and epirubicin are equivalent, but at similar doses epirubicin appears to have a better side effects profile than doxorubicin in terms of myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity. We conducted a retrospective study to establish the role of TEC (epirubicin) regimen in adjuvant setting. Methods: Preor post-menopausal women, with stage I-III breast cancer, PS ECOG 0-2 and normal left ventricular ejection fraction, were eligible. TEC chemotherapy at median doses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 was administered IV on day 1 every three weeks for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was toxicity; secondary endpoints were DFS and OS. Results: Thirty-three consecutive female patients were retrospectively enrolled. The median age was 57 years old. Eighty eight percentage of patients completed the treatment plan. In 21.2% of cases a dose reduction was performed and these patients needed a chemotherapy interval prolongation. The main side effects were neutropenia G3-4 (21.2%; 95% CI, 9.8-37.5), allergic reaction G3 to docetaxel (6.1%; 95% CI, 1.0-18.6) and febrile neutropenia (3.0%; 95% CI, 0.1-14.0), while cardiotoxicity was absent (95% CI, 0-8.7%). Globally, the percentage of any other severe side effect was very low and no one toxic death was seen. The 3-year DFS and OS were 89.9% (95% CI, 79.0-100) and 93.8% (95% CI, 85.6-100), respectively. Conclusions: As compared to TAC treatment, TEC regimen with epirubicin 60 mg/m2 is feasible and well tolerated adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, with acceptable and manageable toxicity.","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2014-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The use of taxanes and anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer is well established, with benefit in both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Several studies demonstrated that the addition of taxanes to anthracycline-based chemotherapy improves the outcome in either concurrent or sequential schedule. Nowadays, the TAC regimen (docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) is a standard treatment in both node-positive and high-risk node-negative early breast cancer. Doxorubicin and epirubicin are equivalent, but at similar doses epirubicin appears to have a better side effects profile than doxorubicin in terms of myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity. We conducted a retrospective study to establish the role of TEC (epirubicin) regimen in adjuvant setting. Methods: Preor post-menopausal women, with stage I-III breast cancer, PS ECOG 0-2 and normal left ventricular ejection fraction, were eligible. TEC chemotherapy at median doses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 was administered IV on day 1 every three weeks for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was toxicity; secondary endpoints were DFS and OS. Results: Thirty-three consecutive female patients were retrospectively enrolled. The median age was 57 years old. Eighty eight percentage of patients completed the treatment plan. In 21.2% of cases a dose reduction was performed and these patients needed a chemotherapy interval prolongation. The main side effects were neutropenia G3-4 (21.2%; 95% CI, 9.8-37.5), allergic reaction G3 to docetaxel (6.1%; 95% CI, 1.0-18.6) and febrile neutropenia (3.0%; 95% CI, 0.1-14.0), while cardiotoxicity was absent (95% CI, 0-8.7%). Globally, the percentage of any other severe side effect was very low and no one toxic death was seen. The 3-year DFS and OS were 89.9% (95% CI, 79.0-100) and 93.8% (95% CI, 85.6-100), respectively. Conclusions: As compared to TAC treatment, TEC regimen with epirubicin 60 mg/m2 is feasible and well tolerated adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, with acceptable and manageable toxicity.
多西紫杉醇、表柔比星和环磷酰胺联合化疗对乳腺癌的辅助治疗:TEC方案。回顾性分析
背景:紫杉烷类和蒽环类药物在原发性乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用已经得到了很好的证实,在无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)方面都有益处。几项研究表明,在蒽环类药物为基础的化疗中添加紫杉烷可以同时或顺序改善结果。目前,TAC方案(多西紫杉醇、阿霉素和环磷酰胺)是淋巴结阳性和高危淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌的标准治疗方案。阿霉素和表柔比星是等效的,但在相同剂量下,表柔比星在骨髓抑制和心脏毒性方面似乎比阿霉素有更好的副作用。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定TEC(表柔比星)方案在辅助设置中的作用。方法:绝经前、患有I-III期乳腺癌、PS ECOG 0-2、左室射血分数正常的妇女。TEC化疗中位剂量为多西他赛75 mg/m2、表柔比星60 mg/m2、环磷酰胺500 mg/m2,每3周第1天静脉给予,共6个周期。主要终点是毒性;次要终点为DFS和OS。结果:33例连续女性患者回顾性入选。平均年龄为57岁。88%的患者完成了治疗计划。在21.2%的病例中进行了剂量减少,这些患者需要延长化疗间隔。主要不良反应为中性粒细胞减少G3-4 (21.2%);95% CI, 9.8-37.5),多西紫杉醇过敏反应G3 (6.1%;95% CI, 1.0-18.6)和发热性中性粒细胞减少症(3.0%;95% CI, 0.1-14.0),而无心脏毒性(95% CI, 0-8.7%)。在全球范围内,任何其他严重副作用的百分比非常低,没有发现任何人中毒死亡。3年DFS和OS分别为89.9% (95% CI, 79.0-100)和93.8% (95% CI, 85.6-100)。结论:与TAC治疗相比,表柔比星60mg /m2的TEC方案是可行且耐受性良好的乳腺癌辅助化疗方案,毒性可接受且可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信