Calculating Heat of Formation Values of Energetic Compounds: A Comparative Study

Michael S. Elioff, J. Hoy, J. Bumpus
{"title":"Calculating Heat of Formation Values of Energetic Compounds: A Comparative Study","authors":"Michael S. Elioff, J. Hoy, J. Bumpus","doi":"10.1155/2016/5082084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heat of formation is one of several important parameters used to assess the performance of energetic compounds. We evaluated the ability of six different methods to accurately calculate gas-phase heat of formation () values for a test set of 45 nitrogen-containing energetic compounds. Density functional theory coupled with the use of isodesmic or other balanced equations yielded calculated results in which 82% (37 of 45) of the values were within ±2.0 kcal/mol of the most recently recommended experimental/reference values available. This was compared to a procedure using density functional theory (DFT) coupled with an atom and group contribution method in which 51% (23 of 45) of the values were within ±2.0 kcal/mol of these values. The T1 procedure and Benson’s group additivity method yielded results in which 51% (23 of 45) and 64% (23 of 36) of the values, respectively, were within ±2.0 kcal/mol of these values. We also compared two relatively new semiempirical approaches (PM7 and RM1) with regard to their ability to accurately calculate . Although semiempirical methods continue to improve, they were found to be less accurate than the other approaches for the test set used in this investigation.","PeriodicalId":7371,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physical Chemistry","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5082084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Heat of formation is one of several important parameters used to assess the performance of energetic compounds. We evaluated the ability of six different methods to accurately calculate gas-phase heat of formation () values for a test set of 45 nitrogen-containing energetic compounds. Density functional theory coupled with the use of isodesmic or other balanced equations yielded calculated results in which 82% (37 of 45) of the values were within ±2.0 kcal/mol of the most recently recommended experimental/reference values available. This was compared to a procedure using density functional theory (DFT) coupled with an atom and group contribution method in which 51% (23 of 45) of the values were within ±2.0 kcal/mol of these values. The T1 procedure and Benson’s group additivity method yielded results in which 51% (23 of 45) and 64% (23 of 36) of the values, respectively, were within ±2.0 kcal/mol of these values. We also compared two relatively new semiempirical approaches (PM7 and RM1) with regard to their ability to accurately calculate . Although semiempirical methods continue to improve, they were found to be less accurate than the other approaches for the test set used in this investigation.
含能化合物生成热值计算的比较研究
生成热是评价含能化合物性能的几个重要参数之一。我们评估了六种不同的方法准确计算45种含氮含能化合物的气相形成热()值的能力。密度函数理论与等地方程或其他平衡方程的使用相结合,得出的计算结果中,82%(45个中的37个)的值在最新推荐的实验/参考值的±2.0 kcal/mol范围内。这与使用密度泛函理论(DFT)与原子和基团贡献方法相结合的过程进行了比较,其中51%(45个中的23个)的值在这些值的±2.0 kcal/mol范围内。T1程序和Benson的群可加性方法的结果分别是51%(23 / 45)和64%(23 / 36)的值在±2.0 kcal/mol范围内。我们还比较了两种相对较新的半经验方法(PM7和RM1)关于他们准确计算的能力。尽管半经验方法不断改进,但它们被发现比本调查中使用的测试集的其他方法更不准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信