Debt strategies of European countries and vectors of implementation of best experience in the practice of external public debt management of Ukraine

I. Moroz
{"title":"Debt strategies of European countries and vectors of implementation of best experience in the practice of external public debt management of Ukraine","authors":"I. Moroz","doi":"10.21303/2504-5571.2021.002023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policy of external and domestic public debt management in different countries has its own specifics, and its results are not always unambiguous. Thus, the existing recommendations of the International Monetary Fund and the Maastricht criteria prove that the maximum value of public debt to GDP should be no more than 60 %. Exceeding this limit can lead to a deterioration in financial stability, debt sustainability, and ultimately to a technical default of the state. However, the practice of public debt management in many developed countries shows quite opposite trends, as a significant excess of the Maastricht criterion not only does not lead to default, but on the contrary allows countries to accumulate the necessary financial resources to ensure stable economic growth. \nTherefore, the study of European debt strategies and their effectiveness is a very important issue, especially given the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for developing countries. Given the growing external debt dependence of Ukraine as a result of both the war with the Russian Federation and the COVID-19 pandemic, the search for a better experience of European debt policy and consideration of ways to adapt it to domestic realities are discussed in our article. \nBased on the analysis of the debt policy of European countries, the expediency of using debt rules, aimed at regulating both the country's debt security and the effectiveness of the use of public borrowing to stimulate economic growth has been proved. \nCluster analysis of debt strategies of some European countries has shown that the high level of dependence on external public debt has a negative impact on economic security in general, because in the event of deteriorating macroeconomic situation, the likelihood of foreign investors selling government securities increases, and in the case of external loans from international financial and credit organizations – the risks of negative impact of burdensome non-financial obligations on the national economy grow.","PeriodicalId":33606,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA Social and Humanities","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA Social and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2021.002023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The policy of external and domestic public debt management in different countries has its own specifics, and its results are not always unambiguous. Thus, the existing recommendations of the International Monetary Fund and the Maastricht criteria prove that the maximum value of public debt to GDP should be no more than 60 %. Exceeding this limit can lead to a deterioration in financial stability, debt sustainability, and ultimately to a technical default of the state. However, the practice of public debt management in many developed countries shows quite opposite trends, as a significant excess of the Maastricht criterion not only does not lead to default, but on the contrary allows countries to accumulate the necessary financial resources to ensure stable economic growth. Therefore, the study of European debt strategies and their effectiveness is a very important issue, especially given the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for developing countries. Given the growing external debt dependence of Ukraine as a result of both the war with the Russian Federation and the COVID-19 pandemic, the search for a better experience of European debt policy and consideration of ways to adapt it to domestic realities are discussed in our article. Based on the analysis of the debt policy of European countries, the expediency of using debt rules, aimed at regulating both the country's debt security and the effectiveness of the use of public borrowing to stimulate economic growth has been proved. Cluster analysis of debt strategies of some European countries has shown that the high level of dependence on external public debt has a negative impact on economic security in general, because in the event of deteriorating macroeconomic situation, the likelihood of foreign investors selling government securities increases, and in the case of external loans from international financial and credit organizations – the risks of negative impact of burdensome non-financial obligations on the national economy grow.
欧洲国家的债务战略和乌克兰对外公共债务管理实践中最佳经验的实施途径
不同国家的国内外公共债务管理政策各有其具体情况,其结果并不总是明确的。因此,国际货币基金组织的现有建议和马斯特里赫特标准证明,公共债务占GDP的最大值应不超过60%。超过这一上限可能导致金融稳定性、债务可持续性恶化,并最终导致国家技术性违约。然而,许多发达国家的公共债务管理实践显示出完全相反的趋势,因为大大超过马斯特里赫特标准不仅不会导致违约,反而使各国能够积累必要的财政资源,以确保稳定的经济增长。因此,研究欧洲债务战略及其有效性是一个非常重要的问题,特别是考虑到COVID-19大流行对发展中国家的影响。鉴于乌克兰由于与俄罗斯联邦的战争和COVID-19大流行而日益依赖外债,我们在文章中讨论了寻求更好的欧洲债务政策经验并考虑如何使其适应国内现实的问题。通过对欧洲国家债务政策的分析,证明了利用债务规则来规范国家债务安全的权宜之计,以及利用公共借贷来刺激经济增长的有效性。对一些欧洲国家债务战略的聚类分析表明,对外部公共债务的高度依赖总体上对经济安全有负面影响,因为在宏观经济形势恶化的情况下,外国投资者出售政府证券的可能性增加。就国际金融和信贷组织的外部贷款而言- -繁重的非金融义务对国民经济增长产生负面影响的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信