Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Granitoids from Kameng Corridor of Arunachal Himalaya, Northeast India

IF 0.2 Q4 GEOLOGY
Santosh Kumar, M. Pathak
{"title":"Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Granitoids from Kameng Corridor of Arunachal Himalaya, Northeast India","authors":"Santosh Kumar, M. Pathak","doi":"10.3126/HJS.V5I7.1316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HIMALAYAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCES | VOL. 5 | ISSUE 7 (SPECIAL ISSUE) | 2008 132 Felsic magmatisms in Kameng Corridor of Arunachal Himalaya are mainly represented by extensively exposed Palaeoproterozoic granite gneiss (GGn), small stock-like undeformed Mesoproterozoic biotite granite (BG) and veins and pods of Tertiary leucogranite (TLg). The magnetic susceptibility (MS) measurements and whole rock geochemistry of these felsic magmatic bodies have been carried out in order to evaluate nature of granite series and petrogenesis of these felsic rocks with its implication on collisional tectonics. The GGn records average MS of 0.243×10-3 SI at Bomdila proper corresponding to ilmenite series (reduced type) granites, which further reduced (χ=0.076×10-3 SI) in close contact with black shales of Salari Group. The BG measures MS values between 0.156 and 0.120×10-3 SI slightly changing from core to margin of the stock suggesting marginal reduction of BG melt at emplacement level. The TLg bears MS values (χ=0.042 to 2.82×10-3 SI) and at places intrudes the hornblende-biotite granite (χ=15.42-27.37×10-3 SI) an older lithounit of Sela Group exposed beyond the Main Crystalline Thrust (MCT). Observed MS variations of these felsic magma bodies appear primarily intrinsic to crustal (metasedimentary) source regions, although these melts have been partly reduced at emplacement level as a result of reaction with carbonaceous country rocks. The modal composition of GGn represents largely monzogranite (ss) whereas BG corresponds to granodiorite, which are related to pre-Himalayan syncollisional and pre-plate collisional tectonics respectively. However, the TLg is ms-bt±tur leucogranite corresponding to peraluminous syncollisional (Himalayan) anatectic melt. Muscovite of GGn represents solidsolution of celadonitic and paragonitic end-members of primary muscovite composition. Empirically estimated Li-content of GGn muscovite relates to Li-mica zinnwaldite. Biotite in GGn is mostly transitional between Feand Mg-biotites evolved from FMQ to NNO buffers syn-crystallizing with muscovite, and exhibits dominant Mg Fe and less pronounced 2Al 3Fe2+ substitutions typical to its evolution in a peraluminous (S-type) felsic melt. Biotite in BG is, however, ferribiotite evolved from FMQ to NNO buffers and exhibits pronounced Mg Fe and less pronounced 3Mg 2Al substitutions typical to its crystallization in a calc-alkaline, metaluminous (I-type) felsic melt. GGn biotite is markedly enriched in siderophyllite and depleted in phlogopite components as compared to BG biotite. Tourmaline from GGn belongs to schorl (Fe)-dravite (Mg)-elbaite (Li+Al) end-members solid-solution typically crystallized in a Li-poor felsic melt. Whole rock composition of GGn (molar A/CNK= 1.19-1.45) and TLg (molar A/CNK=1.29-1.33) represents typical to peraluminous (S-type) granites whereas BG (molar A/ CNK=0.95-0.97) is metaluminous (I-type) in character, strongly suggesting involvement of heterogeneous protoliths in their genesis. Comparison of melts generated by melting experiments of various protoliths suggests that GGn melts might have been generated by melting of biotite-rich metapelites whereas BG melt might have been formed from melting of biotite-rich metapelite and/or plagioclase-rich metagrewacke sources. However, the TLg melt appears formed by melting of muscovite-rich metapelite source. These felsic melts are slightly to strongly reduced-type mostly intrinsic to crustal source regions, but most likely formed in diversed tectonic regimes (pre-plate to syn-collisional). Content of MgO, Fe2O3t, MnO, CaO, K2O, Al2O3, Sr, Nb, Ba decreases with increasing SiO2 content of GGn, showing their compatible nature because of fractional differentiation process mainly involving biotite, plagioclase and K-feldspar. This is further evident by varying degrees of negative Eu-anomalies (EuN/Eu*=0.29-0.47), LaN/LuN=5.7-14.8, and sum of rare earth elements (∑REE= 67-209ppm). However, trace elements characteristics (Y=1.06-1.56 ppm, Yb=16-19 ppm, Sr/Y=14-35, La/Nb=1.7-3.0, La/Yb=25-43, Zr/Sm=34-44) and REE patterns (LaN/LuN=17-30, EuN/Eu*=0.63-0.75) of BG appear more like an adakite-like melt but partly contains features similar to a classic arc type calc-alkaline componets. Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Granitoids from Kameng Corridor of Arunachal Himalaya, Northeast India","PeriodicalId":42873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/HJS.V5I7.1316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HIMALAYAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCES | VOL. 5 | ISSUE 7 (SPECIAL ISSUE) | 2008 132 Felsic magmatisms in Kameng Corridor of Arunachal Himalaya are mainly represented by extensively exposed Palaeoproterozoic granite gneiss (GGn), small stock-like undeformed Mesoproterozoic biotite granite (BG) and veins and pods of Tertiary leucogranite (TLg). The magnetic susceptibility (MS) measurements and whole rock geochemistry of these felsic magmatic bodies have been carried out in order to evaluate nature of granite series and petrogenesis of these felsic rocks with its implication on collisional tectonics. The GGn records average MS of 0.243×10-3 SI at Bomdila proper corresponding to ilmenite series (reduced type) granites, which further reduced (χ=0.076×10-3 SI) in close contact with black shales of Salari Group. The BG measures MS values between 0.156 and 0.120×10-3 SI slightly changing from core to margin of the stock suggesting marginal reduction of BG melt at emplacement level. The TLg bears MS values (χ=0.042 to 2.82×10-3 SI) and at places intrudes the hornblende-biotite granite (χ=15.42-27.37×10-3 SI) an older lithounit of Sela Group exposed beyond the Main Crystalline Thrust (MCT). Observed MS variations of these felsic magma bodies appear primarily intrinsic to crustal (metasedimentary) source regions, although these melts have been partly reduced at emplacement level as a result of reaction with carbonaceous country rocks. The modal composition of GGn represents largely monzogranite (ss) whereas BG corresponds to granodiorite, which are related to pre-Himalayan syncollisional and pre-plate collisional tectonics respectively. However, the TLg is ms-bt±tur leucogranite corresponding to peraluminous syncollisional (Himalayan) anatectic melt. Muscovite of GGn represents solidsolution of celadonitic and paragonitic end-members of primary muscovite composition. Empirically estimated Li-content of GGn muscovite relates to Li-mica zinnwaldite. Biotite in GGn is mostly transitional between Feand Mg-biotites evolved from FMQ to NNO buffers syn-crystallizing with muscovite, and exhibits dominant Mg Fe and less pronounced 2Al 3Fe2+ substitutions typical to its evolution in a peraluminous (S-type) felsic melt. Biotite in BG is, however, ferribiotite evolved from FMQ to NNO buffers and exhibits pronounced Mg Fe and less pronounced 3Mg 2Al substitutions typical to its crystallization in a calc-alkaline, metaluminous (I-type) felsic melt. GGn biotite is markedly enriched in siderophyllite and depleted in phlogopite components as compared to BG biotite. Tourmaline from GGn belongs to schorl (Fe)-dravite (Mg)-elbaite (Li+Al) end-members solid-solution typically crystallized in a Li-poor felsic melt. Whole rock composition of GGn (molar A/CNK= 1.19-1.45) and TLg (molar A/CNK=1.29-1.33) represents typical to peraluminous (S-type) granites whereas BG (molar A/ CNK=0.95-0.97) is metaluminous (I-type) in character, strongly suggesting involvement of heterogeneous protoliths in their genesis. Comparison of melts generated by melting experiments of various protoliths suggests that GGn melts might have been generated by melting of biotite-rich metapelites whereas BG melt might have been formed from melting of biotite-rich metapelite and/or plagioclase-rich metagrewacke sources. However, the TLg melt appears formed by melting of muscovite-rich metapelite source. These felsic melts are slightly to strongly reduced-type mostly intrinsic to crustal source regions, but most likely formed in diversed tectonic regimes (pre-plate to syn-collisional). Content of MgO, Fe2O3t, MnO, CaO, K2O, Al2O3, Sr, Nb, Ba decreases with increasing SiO2 content of GGn, showing their compatible nature because of fractional differentiation process mainly involving biotite, plagioclase and K-feldspar. This is further evident by varying degrees of negative Eu-anomalies (EuN/Eu*=0.29-0.47), LaN/LuN=5.7-14.8, and sum of rare earth elements (∑REE= 67-209ppm). However, trace elements characteristics (Y=1.06-1.56 ppm, Yb=16-19 ppm, Sr/Y=14-35, La/Nb=1.7-3.0, La/Yb=25-43, Zr/Sm=34-44) and REE patterns (LaN/LuN=17-30, EuN/Eu*=0.63-0.75) of BG appear more like an adakite-like melt but partly contains features similar to a classic arc type calc-alkaline componets. Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Granitoids from Kameng Corridor of Arunachal Himalaya, Northeast India
印度东北部**喜马拉雅卡蒙走廊花岗岩类地球化学及岩石成因
喜马拉雅科学| VOL. 5 |第7期(特刊)| 2008 **喜马拉雅卡蒙走廊长英质岩浆活动主要为广泛露露的古元古代花岗片麻岩(GGn)、小块状未变形的中元古代黑云母花岗岩(BG)和第三系浅花岗岩(TLg)的脉状和豆粒状。为了评价这些长英质岩浆岩的花岗岩系列性质和岩石成因及其对碰撞构造的影响,对这些长英质岩浆岩进行了磁化率(MS)测量和全岩石地球化学研究。GGn记录了Bomdila地区0.243×10-3 SI的平均MS,对应于钛铁矿系列(还原型)花岗岩,与Salari群黑色页岩密切接触,进一步还原(χ=0.076×10-3 SI)。BG测量的MS值在0.156和0.120×10-3 SI之间,从核心到库存边缘略有变化,表明BG熔体在就位水平有边际减少。TLg具有MS值(χ=0.042 ~ 2.82×10-3 SI),在侵入角闪黑云母花岗岩(χ=15.42-27.37×10-3 SI)的地方,Sela组较老的岩性单元暴露在主晶逆冲(MCT)之外。观察到的这些长英质岩浆体的质谱变化主要表现为地壳(变质沉积岩)源区的固有特征,尽管这些熔体在侵位水平上由于与碳质岩石的反应而部分减少。GGn模态组成以二长花岗岩为主,BG模态组成以花岗闪长岩为主,分别与前喜马拉雅同碰撞构造和前板块碰撞构造有关。然而,TLg是ms-bt±转浅花岗岩,对应于过铝共碰撞(喜马拉雅)缓熔熔体。GGn的白云母是原生白云母组成中青瓷和肺殖端元的固溶体。经验估计GGn白云母的锂含量与锂云母锌walite有关。GGn中的黑云母主要介于Fe -和Mg-黑云母之间,由FMQ演化为与白云母同晶的NNO缓冲层,表现为Mg- Fe为主,2Al - 3Fe2+取代不明显,这是其在过铝(s型)长英质熔体中演化的典型特征。然而,BG中的黑云母是铁质黑云母,从FMQ到NNO缓冲带演化而来,表现出明显的Mg - Fe和不太明显的3Mg - 2Al取代,这是其在钙碱性、铝质(i型)长英质熔体中结晶的典型特征。与BG型黑云母相比,GGn型黑云母的菱铁矿成分明显富集,绿云母成分明显减少。来自GGn的电气石属于学校(Fe)-驱动石(Mg)-elbaite (Li+Al)端元固溶体,通常在贫锂长晶石熔体中结晶。GGn(臼齿A/CNK= 1.19 ~ 1.45)和TLg(臼齿A/CNK=1.29 ~ 1.33)的岩石组成为典型的过铝花岗岩(s型),而BG(臼齿A/CNK= 0.95 ~ 0.97)的岩石组成为成矿花岗岩(i型),强烈暗示其成因中有非均质原岩的参与。不同原岩熔炼实验的熔体对比表明,GGn熔体可能是由富含黑云母的变长岩熔炼而成,而BG熔体可能是由富含黑云母的变长岩和/或富含斜长石的变长岩熔炼而成。而TLg熔体则是由富白云母变长岩源熔融形成的。这些长英质熔体为弱至强还原型,多为地壳源区固有的,但最有可能形成于不同的构造制度(板块前-同碰撞)。MgO、Fe2O3t、MnO、CaO、K2O、Al2O3、Sr、Nb、Ba的含量随着GGn SiO2含量的增加而降低,表现出以黑云母、斜长石和钾长石为主的分异过程。不同程度的Eu-负异常(EuN/Eu*=0.29 ~ 0.47)、LaN/LuN=5.7 ~ 14.8、稀土元素总和(∑REE= 67 ~ 209ppm)进一步证明了这一点。然而,BG的微量元素特征(Y=1.06 ~ 1.56 ppm, Yb=16 ~ 19 ppm, Sr/Y=14 ~ 35, La/Nb=1.7 ~ 3.0, La/Yb=25 ~ 43, Zr/Sm=34 ~ 44)和稀土元素模式(LaN/LuN=17 ~ 30, EuN/Eu*=0.63 ~ 0.75)更接近于阿钠岩型熔体,但部分具有典型弧型钙碱性组分的特征。印度东北部**喜马拉雅卡蒙走廊花岗岩类地球化学及岩石成因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences" (JHES) is a biannual journal, managed by the National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan. JHES is recognized by Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan in "X" Category. The JHES entertains research articles relevant to the field of geosciences. Typical geoscience-related topics include sedimentary geology, igneous, and metamorphic geology and geochemistry, geographical information system/remote sensing related to natural hazards, and geo-environmental issues and earth quake seismology, and engineering and exploration geophysics. However, as the journal name implies, the articles addressing research relevant to the above disciplines in the Himalayan region will be given prime importance and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信