Specimen Adequacy and Clinicopathological Evaluation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Colorectal Biopsies in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta

Lydia Kencana, N. Rahadiani, Marini Stephanie, D. Handjari, E. Krisnuhoni
{"title":"Specimen Adequacy and Clinicopathological Evaluation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Colorectal Biopsies in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta","authors":"Lydia Kencana, N. Rahadiani, Marini Stephanie, D. Handjari, E. Krisnuhoni","doi":"10.24871/2222021100-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Colorectal mucosal biopsies account for majority of daily practice specimens in the field of gastrointestinal pathology. Most of them were sent for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) evaluation. Due to broad spectrum of histologic findings and different stage of disease, pathologists often find difficulties on calling out diagnosis of IBD. This study aims to evaluate the adequacy of specimen, clinical characteristics, endoscopy and histologic findings of colorectal biopsies from IBD and non-IBD patients.Method: This cross-sectional study included 49 IBD and 49 non-IBD cases registered in the archives of Anatomical Pathology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital Jakarta in 2019. The samples were evaluated for adequacy of specimen, clinical, endoscopy and histologic findings.Results: Most samples were adult with a slight female predominance. All request forms contained the clinical working diagnosis but only 26.5% and 20.4% of them provided clinical history and endoscopy findings. During histology evaluation, 59.2% of the specimen was considered sub-optimal. The most common histologic findings in both IBD and non-IBD groups were diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the lamina propria and crypt distortion. Fibrosis/collagen deposition was found in 38.8% of IBD population compared to 12.2% of non-IBD population (p=0.003). Most IBD cases (55.1%) were categorized as active phase IBD.Conclusion: Since the most common histologic findings in IBD patients were also found in non-IBD patients, IBD diagnosis based on histopathology alone is highly inadvisable. However, there were also lack of clinical data and endoscopy findings in most of colorectal biopsies sent for IBD evaluation. Along with overlapping and unspecific morphology and suboptimal events during histological evaluation, all of this complicated the diagnosis of IBD. Hence multidisciplinary approach is required for a better IBD diagnosis and treatment.","PeriodicalId":22564,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24871/2222021100-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Colorectal mucosal biopsies account for majority of daily practice specimens in the field of gastrointestinal pathology. Most of them were sent for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) evaluation. Due to broad spectrum of histologic findings and different stage of disease, pathologists often find difficulties on calling out diagnosis of IBD. This study aims to evaluate the adequacy of specimen, clinical characteristics, endoscopy and histologic findings of colorectal biopsies from IBD and non-IBD patients.Method: This cross-sectional study included 49 IBD and 49 non-IBD cases registered in the archives of Anatomical Pathology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital Jakarta in 2019. The samples were evaluated for adequacy of specimen, clinical, endoscopy and histologic findings.Results: Most samples were adult with a slight female predominance. All request forms contained the clinical working diagnosis but only 26.5% and 20.4% of them provided clinical history and endoscopy findings. During histology evaluation, 59.2% of the specimen was considered sub-optimal. The most common histologic findings in both IBD and non-IBD groups were diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the lamina propria and crypt distortion. Fibrosis/collagen deposition was found in 38.8% of IBD population compared to 12.2% of non-IBD population (p=0.003). Most IBD cases (55.1%) were categorized as active phase IBD.Conclusion: Since the most common histologic findings in IBD patients were also found in non-IBD patients, IBD diagnosis based on histopathology alone is highly inadvisable. However, there were also lack of clinical data and endoscopy findings in most of colorectal biopsies sent for IBD evaluation. Along with overlapping and unspecific morphology and suboptimal events during histological evaluation, all of this complicated the diagnosis of IBD. Hence multidisciplinary approach is required for a better IBD diagnosis and treatment.
雅加达Cipto Mangunkusumo医院炎症性肠病结直肠活检的标本充分性和临床病理评价
背景:结肠粘膜活检占胃肠道病理领域日常实践标本的大部分。大多数患者被送去进行炎症性肠病(IBD)评估。由于IBD的病理表现广谱且分期不同,病理医师往往难以明确诊断。本研究旨在评估IBD和非IBD患者结肠直肠活检标本的充分性、临床特征、内镜检查和组织学结果。方法:横断面研究纳入2019年雅加达Cipto Mangunkusumo国立转诊医院解剖病理学档案登记的49例IBD和49例非IBD病例。对标本、临床、内窥镜检查和组织学结果的充分性进行评估。结果:多数标本为成虫,女性略占优势。所有申请表均包含临床工作诊断,但只有26.5%和20.4%的申请表提供了临床病史和内窥镜检查结果。在组织学评估中,59.2%的标本被认为是次优的。在IBD和非IBD组中最常见的组织学表现是固有层弥漫性淋巴浆细胞浸润和隐窝扭曲。在38.8%的IBD人群中发现了纤维化/胶原沉积,而在非IBD人群中发现了12.2% (p=0.003)。大多数IBD病例(55.1%)被归类为活动性IBD。结论:由于在IBD患者中最常见的组织学表现也在非IBD患者中发现,因此仅根据组织病理学诊断IBD是非常不可取的。然而,大多数用于IBD评估的结直肠活检也缺乏临床数据和内窥镜检查结果。随着组织学评估中的重叠和非特异性形态学以及次优事件,所有这些都使IBD的诊断复杂化。因此,需要多学科的方法来更好地诊断和治疗IBD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信