Lucas de Albuquerque Freire, M. Brito, Pablo Merino Muñoz, D. Pérez, Hugo Cerda Kohler, E. Aedo-Muñoz, M. Slimani, C. Brito, N. Bragazzi, H. Znazen, B. Miarka
{"title":"Match Running Performance of Brazilian Professional Soccer Players according to Tournament Types","authors":"Lucas de Albuquerque Freire, M. Brito, Pablo Merino Muñoz, D. Pérez, Hugo Cerda Kohler, E. Aedo-Muñoz, M. Slimani, C. Brito, N. Bragazzi, H. Znazen, B. Miarka","doi":"10.26773/mjssm.220306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to report different level games in terms of their external game loads, using data collected from GPS performance indicators in Brazilian soccer teams. We used measures of 464 performances of professional soccer athletes during the National Tournament (NT=265), State Tournament (ST=89), National Cup (NC=44), and the International Tournament (IT=66). The performance analysis included the assessment of Total (meters) and Relative (meters/minutes) distances; running (>14km/h), and sprinting (>18km/h) distance; the number of sprints (>18km/h and >24km/h); accelerations (above three m/s2), deceleration (less than three m/s2) and jumps (>30 cm); Total and Relative load – per minute. There were differences (p<0.05) in terms of relative distance between NT and ST (102.2 ±9.5 vs. 98.1± 10.3) and between ST and NC (98.1± 10.3 vs. 103.4 ±9.6). In sprints >18km/h NT differed from ST (60.4 ±5.9 vs 52.7 ±19.9). In sprints >24km/h differences could be found between NT and ST (10.7 ±5.9 vs 8.7 ±5.4). In Total Load NT differed with respect to ST (908.6 ±141.5 vs. 852.7 ±138.5) In Relative Load differences were reported between NT and ST (10 ±1.2 vs. 9.3 ±1.4) and IT (10 ±1.2 vs. 9.4 ±1.4), and between ST and NC (9.3 ±1.4 vs. 10.0 ±1.4). Finally, concerning deceleration, NT differed when compared to ST (36.1 ±9.9 vs. 32 ±11) as well as ST differed from IT (32 ±11 vs. 37.5 ±9.7). The present results make it possible to create specific training games according to tournament level associated with the predominant activities performed during the competition.","PeriodicalId":18942,"journal":{"name":"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.220306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
The present study aimed to report different level games in terms of their external game loads, using data collected from GPS performance indicators in Brazilian soccer teams. We used measures of 464 performances of professional soccer athletes during the National Tournament (NT=265), State Tournament (ST=89), National Cup (NC=44), and the International Tournament (IT=66). The performance analysis included the assessment of Total (meters) and Relative (meters/minutes) distances; running (>14km/h), and sprinting (>18km/h) distance; the number of sprints (>18km/h and >24km/h); accelerations (above three m/s2), deceleration (less than three m/s2) and jumps (>30 cm); Total and Relative load – per minute. There were differences (p<0.05) in terms of relative distance between NT and ST (102.2 ±9.5 vs. 98.1± 10.3) and between ST and NC (98.1± 10.3 vs. 103.4 ±9.6). In sprints >18km/h NT differed from ST (60.4 ±5.9 vs 52.7 ±19.9). In sprints >24km/h differences could be found between NT and ST (10.7 ±5.9 vs 8.7 ±5.4). In Total Load NT differed with respect to ST (908.6 ±141.5 vs. 852.7 ±138.5) In Relative Load differences were reported between NT and ST (10 ±1.2 vs. 9.3 ±1.4) and IT (10 ±1.2 vs. 9.4 ±1.4), and between ST and NC (9.3 ±1.4 vs. 10.0 ±1.4). Finally, concerning deceleration, NT differed when compared to ST (36.1 ±9.9 vs. 32 ±11) as well as ST differed from IT (32 ±11 vs. 37.5 ±9.7). The present results make it possible to create specific training games according to tournament level associated with the predominant activities performed during the competition.
本研究旨在报告不同级别游戏的外部游戏负载,使用从巴西足球队的GPS性能指标收集的数据。我们对464名职业足球运动员在全国锦标赛(NT=265)、州锦标赛(ST=89)、全国杯赛(NC=44)和国际锦标赛(IT=66)期间的表现进行了测量。成绩分析包括总(米)距离和相对(米/分钟)距离的评估;跑步(>14km/h)、冲刺(>18km/h)距离;冲刺次数(>18km/h和>24km/h);加速(大于3 m/s2)、减速(小于3 m/s2)和跳跃(>30 cm);总负荷和相对负荷-每分钟。两者存在差异(p18km/h NT差异于ST(60.4±5.9 vs 52.7±19.9))。在>24km/h的短跑中,NT和ST之间存在差异(10.7±5.9 vs 8.7±5.4)。NT与ST的总负荷差异(908.6±141.5 vs 852.7±138.5),NT与ST的相对负荷差异(10±1.2 vs 9.3±1.4),IT的相对负荷差异(10±1.2 vs 9.4±1.4),ST与NC的相对负荷差异(9.3±1.4 vs 10.0±1.4)。最后,在减速方面,NT与ST(36.1±9.9 vs. 32±11)不同,ST与IT(32±11 vs. 37.5±9.7)不同。目前的结果使得根据与比赛期间进行的主要活动相关的锦标赛级别创建特定的训练游戏成为可能。
期刊介绍:
MJSSM covers all aspects of sports science and medicine; all clinical aspects of exercise, health, and sport; exercise physiology and biophysical investigation of sports performance; sport biomechanics; sports nutrition; rehabilitation, physiotherapy; sports psychology; sport pedagogy, sport history, sport philosophy, sport sociology, sport management; and all aspects of scientific support of the sports coaches from the natural, social and humanistic side.