Self-Control and Provision of Education Subsidies

Soohyung Lee
{"title":"Self-Control and Provision of Education Subsidies","authors":"Soohyung Lee","doi":"10.17256/JER.2012.17.1.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a simple yet unified framework that not only provides a rationale for a government’s education subsidies but also allows us to examine what kinds of subsidies would be the least costly. The paper builds a model based on hyperbolic discounting utilities in which a government’s intervention in education is justified to ease individual’s self-control problem leading to the underinvestment in education; it shows that when the degree of self-control problem is high (low), conditional cash transfer is more (less) cost-effective than price subsidies. Those model predictions are consistent with the empirical patterns observed in education subsidies around the world.","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"24 1","pages":"61-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2012.17.1.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper provides a simple yet unified framework that not only provides a rationale for a government’s education subsidies but also allows us to examine what kinds of subsidies would be the least costly. The paper builds a model based on hyperbolic discounting utilities in which a government’s intervention in education is justified to ease individual’s self-control problem leading to the underinvestment in education; it shows that when the degree of self-control problem is high (low), conditional cash transfer is more (less) cost-effective than price subsidies. Those model predictions are consistent with the empirical patterns observed in education subsidies around the world.
自我控制与提供教育补贴
本文提供了一个简单而统一的框架,不仅为政府的教育补贴提供了一个基本原理,而且还允许我们研究哪种补贴成本最低。本文建立了一个基于双曲折现效用的模型,在该模型中,政府干预教育是合理的,以缓解个人自我控制问题导致的教育投资不足;研究表明,当企业自我控制问题程度较高(较低)时,有条件现金转移比价格补贴更具(较低)成本效益。这些模型预测与在世界各地教育补贴中观察到的经验模式是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信