New Perspectives on Human Problem Solving

Robert L. Goldstone, Z. Pizlo
{"title":"New Perspectives on Human Problem Solving","authors":"Robert L. Goldstone, Z. Pizlo","doi":"10.7771/1932-6246.1055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In November 2008 at Purdue University, the 2 Workshop on Human Problem Solving was held. This workshop, which was a natural continuation of the first workshop devoted almost exclusively to optimization problems, addressed a wider range of topics that reflect the scope of the Journal of Problem Solving. The workshop was attended by 35 researchers from around the world. The program of the workshop is available at: http:// spiderman.psych.purdue.edu/problem_solving/workshop08/. There were two full days of talks and posters, covering insight, education, decision making and causality, combinatorial optimization and applications. The level of excitement was high, and the lively and informative discussions confirmed that, despite the fragmentation of the field, there is something special and unique about problem solving that is likely to help define the field, almost exactly 100 years after the Gestalt Psychologists established it for the first time. Defining the field is obviously important, but doing solid research and disseminating the results is absolutely critical. This special issue provides a nice sample of the current work on human problem solving illustrating a variety of experimental tools and conceptual frameworks. Why has problem solving remained one of the most important topics in human cognition? Problem solving is the activity in which people show their uniquely human gift for flexible cognition and adaptation. We are not always shackled victims of habit. We can think flexibly about situations that we have never come across before, and arrive at apt and fresh responses to them. We can change how we represent problems. We can come up with novel strategies for solving problems. In other words, we can program ourselves to solve problems. These capabilities still distinguish human problem solving from machine intelligence efforts. Long after humans have been replaced by machines in tasks where automatic algorithms can be deployed to effectively accommodate known situations, genuine problem solving requiring the creation of thinking tools, representations, strategies, and meta-cognitive awareness will still be a privileged domain of humans. Over time, we are getting a better understanding of what tasks require truly flexible problem solving","PeriodicalId":90070,"journal":{"name":"The journal of problem solving","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of problem solving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In November 2008 at Purdue University, the 2 Workshop on Human Problem Solving was held. This workshop, which was a natural continuation of the first workshop devoted almost exclusively to optimization problems, addressed a wider range of topics that reflect the scope of the Journal of Problem Solving. The workshop was attended by 35 researchers from around the world. The program of the workshop is available at: http:// spiderman.psych.purdue.edu/problem_solving/workshop08/. There were two full days of talks and posters, covering insight, education, decision making and causality, combinatorial optimization and applications. The level of excitement was high, and the lively and informative discussions confirmed that, despite the fragmentation of the field, there is something special and unique about problem solving that is likely to help define the field, almost exactly 100 years after the Gestalt Psychologists established it for the first time. Defining the field is obviously important, but doing solid research and disseminating the results is absolutely critical. This special issue provides a nice sample of the current work on human problem solving illustrating a variety of experimental tools and conceptual frameworks. Why has problem solving remained one of the most important topics in human cognition? Problem solving is the activity in which people show their uniquely human gift for flexible cognition and adaptation. We are not always shackled victims of habit. We can think flexibly about situations that we have never come across before, and arrive at apt and fresh responses to them. We can change how we represent problems. We can come up with novel strategies for solving problems. In other words, we can program ourselves to solve problems. These capabilities still distinguish human problem solving from machine intelligence efforts. Long after humans have been replaced by machines in tasks where automatic algorithms can be deployed to effectively accommodate known situations, genuine problem solving requiring the creation of thinking tools, representations, strategies, and meta-cognitive awareness will still be a privileged domain of humans. Over time, we are getting a better understanding of what tasks require truly flexible problem solving
人类解决问题的新视角
2008年11月在普渡大学举行了人类问题解决研讨会。这次研讨会是第一次专门讨论优化问题的研讨会的自然延续,讨论了更广泛的主题,反映了《问题解决》杂志的范围。来自世界各地的35名研究人员参加了研讨会。研讨会日程安排可在http://spiderman.psych.purdue.edu/problem_solving/workshop08/查阅。有整整两天的演讲和海报,涵盖洞察力,教育,决策和因果关系,组合优化和应用。兴奋的程度是很高的,而生动和信息丰富的讨论证实,尽管这个领域是碎片化的,但在格式塔心理学家第一次建立这个领域几乎整整100年后,解决问题的一些特殊和独特的东西可能有助于定义这个领域。定义这个领域显然很重要,但做扎实的研究并传播结果绝对是至关重要的。本期特刊提供了当前人类问题解决工作的一个很好的例子,说明了各种实验工具和概念框架。为什么解决问题仍然是人类认知中最重要的课题之一?解决问题是人们表现出灵活的认知和适应能力的独特的人类天赋的活动。我们并不总是习惯的牺牲品。我们可以灵活地思考以前从未遇到过的情况,并对它们做出恰当而新鲜的反应。我们可以改变表达问题的方式。我们可以想出解决问题的新策略。换句话说,我们可以通过编程来解决问题。这些能力仍然将人类解决问题的能力与机器智能的能力区分开来。在自动算法可以有效地适应已知情况的任务中,人类已经被机器取代很久之后,真正的问题解决需要创造思维工具、表示、策略和元认知意识,这仍然是人类的特权领域。随着时间的推移,我们对哪些任务需要真正灵活地解决问题有了更好的理解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书