Construction Stage Seismic Resilience Evaluation of a Continuous Girder Bridge with the Cast-in-Place Cantilever Construction Method

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Construction Stage Seismic Resilience Evaluation of a Continuous Girder Bridge with the Cast-in-Place Cantilever Construction Method","authors":"","doi":"10.17559/tv-20210929102016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To rapidly evaluate the seismic resilience of the bridges under construction, the construction stage seismic resilience evaluation method was proposed. Based on a case bridge of continuous girder with the cast-in-place cantilever construction method, the seismic resilience of bridges at different construction stages was researched and compared. The bridge model was established by utilizing the construction stage module in the Midas Civil finite element modelling software. The functional losses of the bridges at different construction stages were computed. The three dimensional functional surfaces of Function-Time-PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration) were drawn. The resilience indexes at different construction stages with different seismic PGAs were compared, the resilience indexes with and without consideration of the delay recovery period were compared and analysed. The research results show: 1) in the control period, the functional loss is directly proportional to the PGA, but the function and resilience indexes are inversely proportional to the PGA; 2) the seismic resilience indexes of bridges at different construction stages are vastly different; 3) the resilience indexes with and without consideration of the delay recovery period are different; for the case bridge with the delay recovery period to recovery period ratio of 20%, the difference of the resilience indexes with and without consideration of the delay recovery period can reach 17% when the seismic PGA is 1.0 g. This paper provides a new method to evaluate the seismic resilience of construction stages, and it can be used to provide suggestions for the seismic damage evaluation and post-seismic recovery scheme.","PeriodicalId":49443,"journal":{"name":"Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20210929102016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: To rapidly evaluate the seismic resilience of the bridges under construction, the construction stage seismic resilience evaluation method was proposed. Based on a case bridge of continuous girder with the cast-in-place cantilever construction method, the seismic resilience of bridges at different construction stages was researched and compared. The bridge model was established by utilizing the construction stage module in the Midas Civil finite element modelling software. The functional losses of the bridges at different construction stages were computed. The three dimensional functional surfaces of Function-Time-PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration) were drawn. The resilience indexes at different construction stages with different seismic PGAs were compared, the resilience indexes with and without consideration of the delay recovery period were compared and analysed. The research results show: 1) in the control period, the functional loss is directly proportional to the PGA, but the function and resilience indexes are inversely proportional to the PGA; 2) the seismic resilience indexes of bridges at different construction stages are vastly different; 3) the resilience indexes with and without consideration of the delay recovery period are different; for the case bridge with the delay recovery period to recovery period ratio of 20%, the difference of the resilience indexes with and without consideration of the delay recovery period can reach 17% when the seismic PGA is 1.0 g. This paper provides a new method to evaluate the seismic resilience of construction stages, and it can be used to provide suggestions for the seismic damage evaluation and post-seismic recovery scheme.
悬臂现浇法连续梁桥施工阶段抗震性能评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette
Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
270
审稿时长
12.6 months
期刊介绍: The journal TEHNIČKI VJESNIK - TECHNICAL GAZETTE publishes scientific and professional papers in the area of technical sciences (mostly from mechanical, electrical and civil engineering, and also from their boundary areas). All articles have undergone peer review and upon acceptance are permanently free of all restrictions on access, for everyone to read and download. For all articles authors will be asked to pay a publication fee prior to the article appearing in the journal. However, this fee only to be paid after the article has been positively reviewed and accepted for publishing. All details can be seen at http://www.tehnicki-vjesnik.com/web/public/page First year of publication: 1994 Frequency (annually): 6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信