Is there any benefit in adding postoperative adjuvant concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for penile cancer with regional lymph node metastasis?

Q1 Medicine
R. Choo, A. Nehra, F. Zattoni, L. Pagliaro, R. Karnes
{"title":"Is there any benefit in adding postoperative adjuvant concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for penile cancer with regional lymph node metastasis?","authors":"R. Choo, A. Nehra, F. Zattoni, L. Pagliaro, R. Karnes","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03387-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo evaluate whether there is any benefit in adding postoperative adjuvant concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT-CHT) for penile cancer with regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM).\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nA single institution, retrospective study was conducted for a total of 23 patients with RLNM from penile squamous cell carcinoma. All underwent a definitive surgical intervention for both primary tumor and RLNM. Of these, 11 patients received adjuvant concurrent RT and CHT within 3 months after surgery (RT-CHT Group), while 12 patients received no additional treatment (Surveillance Group). Overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The difference in survival between the two groups was tested using the log-rank test. A potential prognostic factor for survival was evaluated using a univariate Cox-proportional hazards model.\n\n\nRESULTS\nMedian follow-up for the entire group was 15.8 months (17.1 months for the RT-CHT group and 10.7 months for the Surveillance Group). Overall survival at 1 and 2 years were 54.5% and 27.2%, respectively, for the RT-CHT Group, compared to 57.1% and 28.4% for the Surveillance Group (log-rank=0.68). On a univariate analysis, the number of involved lymph nodes and the presence of pN3 disease were associated with poor prognosis (p>0.001 and p=0.049, respectively). The RT-CHT Group had more extensive RLNM with a higher median number of positive nodes (5 vs. 3) and more pN3 disease (72.7% vs. 16.7%) than the Surveillance Group. The rate of complications requiring hospitalization was higher in the RT-CHT Group (63.6% vs. 16.6%; p=0.02), as was the rate of systemic complications (34.7% vs. 0%; p <0.01).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPenile cancer with extensive RLNM carries a poor prognosis. Despite having more extensive RLNM, the RT-CHT group had a similar overall survival as the Surveillance Group. This suggests a potential benefit of postoperative adjuvant concurrent RT-CHT for patients with extensive RLNM, although it carries an increased risk of complications. Further study is warranted to assess the benefit-to-risk ratio of this combined adjuvant therapy.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03387-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate whether there is any benefit in adding postoperative adjuvant concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT-CHT) for penile cancer with regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM). MATERIALS AND METHODS A single institution, retrospective study was conducted for a total of 23 patients with RLNM from penile squamous cell carcinoma. All underwent a definitive surgical intervention for both primary tumor and RLNM. Of these, 11 patients received adjuvant concurrent RT and CHT within 3 months after surgery (RT-CHT Group), while 12 patients received no additional treatment (Surveillance Group). Overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The difference in survival between the two groups was tested using the log-rank test. A potential prognostic factor for survival was evaluated using a univariate Cox-proportional hazards model. RESULTS Median follow-up for the entire group was 15.8 months (17.1 months for the RT-CHT group and 10.7 months for the Surveillance Group). Overall survival at 1 and 2 years were 54.5% and 27.2%, respectively, for the RT-CHT Group, compared to 57.1% and 28.4% for the Surveillance Group (log-rank=0.68). On a univariate analysis, the number of involved lymph nodes and the presence of pN3 disease were associated with poor prognosis (p>0.001 and p=0.049, respectively). The RT-CHT Group had more extensive RLNM with a higher median number of positive nodes (5 vs. 3) and more pN3 disease (72.7% vs. 16.7%) than the Surveillance Group. The rate of complications requiring hospitalization was higher in the RT-CHT Group (63.6% vs. 16.6%; p=0.02), as was the rate of systemic complications (34.7% vs. 0%; p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS Penile cancer with extensive RLNM carries a poor prognosis. Despite having more extensive RLNM, the RT-CHT group had a similar overall survival as the Surveillance Group. This suggests a potential benefit of postoperative adjuvant concurrent RT-CHT for patients with extensive RLNM, although it carries an increased risk of complications. Further study is warranted to assess the benefit-to-risk ratio of this combined adjuvant therapy.
对伴有局部淋巴结转移的阴茎癌术后增加辅助放化疗是否有好处?
目的探讨阴茎癌合并区域淋巴结转移(RLNM)术后增加辅助放化疗(RT-CHT)是否有益处。材料与方法对23例阴茎鳞状细胞癌RLNM患者进行单机构回顾性研究。所有患者都接受了原发性肿瘤和RLNM的明确手术干预。其中,11例患者在术后3个月内同时接受辅助RT和CHT治疗(RT-CHT组),12例患者未接受额外治疗(观察组)。用Kaplan-Meier法计算总生存期。两组的生存差异采用log-rank检验。使用单变量cox -比例风险模型评估潜在的生存预后因素。结果全组中位随访时间为15.8个月(RT-CHT组17.1个月,监测组10.7个月)。RT-CHT组1年和2年的总生存率分别为54.5%和27.2%,而监测组为57.1%和28.4% (log-rank=0.68)。在单变量分析中,受累淋巴结的数量和pN3疾病的存在与预后不良相关(p>0.001和p=0.049)。RT-CHT组的RLNM更广泛,阳性淋巴结中位数更高(5比3),pN3疾病更多(72.7%比16.7%)。RT-CHT组并发症住院率更高(63.6% vs. 16.6%;P =0.02),全身性并发症发生率(34.7% vs 0%;p < 0.01)。结论膀胱癌伴广泛RLNM预后较差。尽管有更广泛的RLNM, RT-CHT组的总生存率与监视组相似。这表明对于广泛的RLNM患者,术后辅助并发RT-CHT有潜在的益处,尽管它会增加并发症的风险。需要进一步的研究来评估这种联合辅助治疗的获益-风险比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信