Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Models to Detect Covid-19 Based on X-Ray Images

S. Riyadi, Yunita Lestari, Cahya Damarjati, K. Ghazali
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Models to Detect Covid-19 Based on X-Ray Images","authors":"S. Riyadi, Yunita Lestari, Cahya Damarjati, K. Ghazali","doi":"10.24002/ijis.v4i2.5491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SARS-Cov-2 outbreak caused by a coronavirus infection shocked dozens of countries. This disease has spread rapidly and become a new pandemic, a serious threat and even destroys various sectors of life. Along with technological developments, various deep learning models have been developed to classify between Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images of lungs, such as Inception V3, Inception V4 and MobileNet. These models have been separately reported to perform good classification on Covid-19. However, there is no comparison of their performance in classifying Covid-19 on the same data. This research aims to compare the performance of the three mentioned deep learning models in classifying Covid-19 based on X-ray images. The methods involve data collection, pre-processing, training, and testing using the three models. According to 2,169 dataset, the InceptionV3 model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.62%, precision value 99.65%, recall value 99.5%, specificity value 99.5%, and f-score value 99.52%; while the InceptionV4 model obtained an average accuracy value of 97.79%, precision value 98.11%, recall value 90.18%, specificity value 90.18%, and f-score value 97.25%; and the MobileNet model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.67%, precision value 99.77%, recall value 99.38%, specificity value 99.38%, and f-score value of 99.67%. The three models can classify the Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images based on research results, while the MobileNet model achieved the best performance. The model has stable performance in achieving graphic results and has extensive layers; the more layers there are to achieve better accuracy results.","PeriodicalId":34118,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Information Systems","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v4i2.5491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The SARS-Cov-2 outbreak caused by a coronavirus infection shocked dozens of countries. This disease has spread rapidly and become a new pandemic, a serious threat and even destroys various sectors of life. Along with technological developments, various deep learning models have been developed to classify between Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images of lungs, such as Inception V3, Inception V4 and MobileNet. These models have been separately reported to perform good classification on Covid-19. However, there is no comparison of their performance in classifying Covid-19 on the same data. This research aims to compare the performance of the three mentioned deep learning models in classifying Covid-19 based on X-ray images. The methods involve data collection, pre-processing, training, and testing using the three models. According to 2,169 dataset, the InceptionV3 model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.62%, precision value 99.65%, recall value 99.5%, specificity value 99.5%, and f-score value 99.52%; while the InceptionV4 model obtained an average accuracy value of 97.79%, precision value 98.11%, recall value 90.18%, specificity value 90.18%, and f-score value 97.25%; and the MobileNet model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.67%, precision value 99.77%, recall value 99.38%, specificity value 99.38%, and f-score value of 99.67%. The three models can classify the Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images based on research results, while the MobileNet model achieved the best performance. The model has stable performance in achieving graphic results and has extensive layers; the more layers there are to achieve better accuracy results.
基于x射线图像检测Covid-19的深度学习模型性能比较
由冠状病毒感染引起的SARS-Cov-2疫情震惊了数十个国家。这一疾病迅速蔓延,成为一种新的流行病,严重威胁甚至破坏了生活的各个方面。随着技术的发展,人们开发了各种深度学习模型来区分Covid-19和正常的肺部x射线图像,如Inception V3、Inception V4和MobileNet。这些模型分别被报道对Covid-19进行了良好的分类。然而,在相同的数据上,它们在对Covid-19进行分类方面的表现没有比较。本研究旨在比较上述三种深度学习模型在基于x射线图像对Covid-19进行分类方面的性能。方法包括数据收集、预处理、训练和使用这三种模型的测试。根据2169个数据集,InceptionV3模型的平均准确率为99.62%,准确率为99.65%,召回率为99.5%,特异性为99.5%,f-score值为99.52%;InceptionV4模型的平均准确率为97.79%,准确率为98.11%,召回率为90.18%,特异性为90.18%,f-score值为97.25%;MobileNet模型的平均准确率为99.67%,准确率为99.77%,召回率为99.38%,特异性为99.38%,f-score值为99.67%。三种模型均能根据研究结果对Covid-19和Normal x射线图像进行分类,其中MobileNet模型的分类效果最好。该模型具有图形化效果稳定、层数广泛的特点;层数越多,精度越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信