Lidocaine-induced anaphylactic shock – A case report

Sathya Narayana Reddy, Amal Govind, Surya Teja, Saroj R. Dudi
{"title":"Lidocaine-induced anaphylactic shock – A case report","authors":"Sathya Narayana Reddy, Amal Govind, Surya Teja, Saroj R. Dudi","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2023.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to local anaesthetics are extremely uncommon. One of the most widely used local anaesthetics for minor dental and other surgical procedures is lidocaine. The incidence of anaphylactic reaction by Inj. Lidocaine among global population is <1%. The first anaphylactic reaction reported in 1902. A 69-year-old female patient shifted to community hospital emergency department. She presented with complaints of vertigo, anxiety, tachypnoea, hypoxia, and sudden onset of breathlessness. History revealed on administration of Inj. Lidocaine a local anaesthesia to her before knee surgery developed above-mentioned symptoms after 15 minutes. After receiving her from OT patient vitals observed as pulse rate-97bpm, GRBS-140mg/dl, blood pressure-170/70mmHg, spo95% with 0. On emergency basis treated her with anti-histamines (Inj. Chlorpheniramine), steroids (Inj. Hydrocortisone-400mg, Inj.solumedrol-1gm), oxygen support of 7 to 8 lit/min, after 4 days she recovered completely and discharged. We used a scale (Naranjo scale) to evaluate the severity of the adverse drug reaction as per scale, score was five that indicates probability of happening adverse reaction. We conclude the case as anaphylactic reaction to lidocaine could have been cause of the event. It is important to collect patients complete past medical history and their allergic history. Also by giving importance to drug sensitivity testing at least to the list of drugs that are reported to show allergic reactions or anaphylactic reactions in post marketing surveillance. Optimised management protocols can save both the patient life and dilemma faced by physicians.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2023.064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to local anaesthetics are extremely uncommon. One of the most widely used local anaesthetics for minor dental and other surgical procedures is lidocaine. The incidence of anaphylactic reaction by Inj. Lidocaine among global population is <1%. The first anaphylactic reaction reported in 1902. A 69-year-old female patient shifted to community hospital emergency department. She presented with complaints of vertigo, anxiety, tachypnoea, hypoxia, and sudden onset of breathlessness. History revealed on administration of Inj. Lidocaine a local anaesthesia to her before knee surgery developed above-mentioned symptoms after 15 minutes. After receiving her from OT patient vitals observed as pulse rate-97bpm, GRBS-140mg/dl, blood pressure-170/70mmHg, spo95% with 0. On emergency basis treated her with anti-histamines (Inj. Chlorpheniramine), steroids (Inj. Hydrocortisone-400mg, Inj.solumedrol-1gm), oxygen support of 7 to 8 lit/min, after 4 days she recovered completely and discharged. We used a scale (Naranjo scale) to evaluate the severity of the adverse drug reaction as per scale, score was five that indicates probability of happening adverse reaction. We conclude the case as anaphylactic reaction to lidocaine could have been cause of the event. It is important to collect patients complete past medical history and their allergic history. Also by giving importance to drug sensitivity testing at least to the list of drugs that are reported to show allergic reactions or anaphylactic reactions in post marketing surveillance. Optimised management protocols can save both the patient life and dilemma faced by physicians.
利多卡因致过敏性休克1例
ige介导的局部麻醉超敏反应(HRs)是非常罕见的。利多卡因是一种最广泛用于小型牙科和其他外科手术的局部麻醉剂。注射引起的过敏反应发生率。利多卡因在全球人口中的比例<1%。第一例过敏反应报告于1902年。69岁女性患者转至社区医院急诊科。她主诉有眩晕、焦虑、呼吸急促、缺氧和突发性呼吸困难。注射史揭示。膝关节术前局部麻醉利多卡因15分钟后出现上述症状。从OT接收她后,患者的生命体征观察为脉搏率-97bpm, GRBS-140mg/dl,血压170/ 70mmhg, spo95%, 0。在紧急情况下给她注射抗组胺药。氯苯那敏),类固醇(注射)。氢化可的松-400mg,固甲醇-1gm),吸氧7 ~ 8lit /min, 4 d后完全恢复出院。采用纳兰霍量表(Naranjo scale)对药物不良反应的严重程度进行评分,分值为5分,表示发生不良反应的概率。我们的结论是,对利多卡因的过敏反应可能是导致该事件的原因。收集患者完整的既往病史和过敏史非常重要。此外,通过重视药物敏感性测试,至少对在上市后监测中报告出现过敏反应或过敏反应的药物列表给予重视。优化的管理方案既可以挽救患者的生命,也可以避免医生面临的困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信