Effect of In-Office Bleaching Agents on Three Different Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study

IF 0.6
Hisham Mostafa, F. Othman, Hanan Abouelseoud, Dalia M Abouelmagd, A. Naga
{"title":"Effect of In-Office Bleaching Agents on Three Different Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Hisham Mostafa, F. Othman, Hanan Abouelseoud, Dalia M Abouelmagd, A. Naga","doi":"10.5455/jcmr.2023.14.03.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two hydrogen peroxide concentrations, commonly used in In-Office bleaching, on the surface roughness and color change of different esthetic restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Sixty disc samples (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) of the different restorative materials used were constructed following the manufacturers’ instructions. Samples were classified into three main groups (n=20) according to the type of restorative material: Group1: Microhybrid composite Filtek P90 Silorane, Group 2: IPS emax Press and Group 3: Vitadur Alpha porcelain. Each of the three groups was divided into two subgroups (n=10) (a and b) according to the type of bleaching agent used (Opalesence Xtra Boost 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) and Zoom 2 25% HP respectively). Samples of subgroups were further divided into two equal divisions (n=5) according to the type of test performed (Roughness testing and Color assessment). Each sample was assessed for surface roughness and color change before bleaching so that each sample served as its own control. Surface roughness was examined using Environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM). Color measurements were made with spectrophotometer using CIELAB color scale. One sample from each subgroup was examined to confirm their crystalline phase before and after bleaching using X-Ray Diffraction. Results were statistically analyzed. Results: Significant differences in Ra values were observed between the unbleached and bleached samples, as well as between subgroups treated with Opalesence Xtra Boost and those treated with Zoom 2. The two bleaching agents had statistically significant effect on the color of restorative materials (P<0.05). Moreover, the color change was found to be significantly higher for the restorative materials treated with Opalesence Xtra Boost compared to Zoom 2, regarding their mean ΔE values. Conclusion: Highly concentrated in-office bleaching systems adversely affected the surface roughness and color of Filtek P90 Silorane, IPS e-max Press and Vitadur Alpha porcelain.","PeriodicalId":41505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Complementary Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcmr.2023.14.03.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two hydrogen peroxide concentrations, commonly used in In-Office bleaching, on the surface roughness and color change of different esthetic restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Sixty disc samples (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) of the different restorative materials used were constructed following the manufacturers’ instructions. Samples were classified into three main groups (n=20) according to the type of restorative material: Group1: Microhybrid composite Filtek P90 Silorane, Group 2: IPS emax Press and Group 3: Vitadur Alpha porcelain. Each of the three groups was divided into two subgroups (n=10) (a and b) according to the type of bleaching agent used (Opalesence Xtra Boost 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) and Zoom 2 25% HP respectively). Samples of subgroups were further divided into two equal divisions (n=5) according to the type of test performed (Roughness testing and Color assessment). Each sample was assessed for surface roughness and color change before bleaching so that each sample served as its own control. Surface roughness was examined using Environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM). Color measurements were made with spectrophotometer using CIELAB color scale. One sample from each subgroup was examined to confirm their crystalline phase before and after bleaching using X-Ray Diffraction. Results were statistically analyzed. Results: Significant differences in Ra values were observed between the unbleached and bleached samples, as well as between subgroups treated with Opalesence Xtra Boost and those treated with Zoom 2. The two bleaching agents had statistically significant effect on the color of restorative materials (P<0.05). Moreover, the color change was found to be significantly higher for the restorative materials treated with Opalesence Xtra Boost compared to Zoom 2, regarding their mean ΔE values. Conclusion: Highly concentrated in-office bleaching systems adversely affected the surface roughness and color of Filtek P90 Silorane, IPS e-max Press and Vitadur Alpha porcelain.
室内漂白剂对三种不同美学修复材料的影响:体外研究
目的:评价两种过氧化氢浓度对不同美容修复材料表面粗糙度和颜色变化的影响。材料和方法:根据制造商的说明,制作60个不同修复材料的圆盘样品(直径10 mm,厚度2 mm)。根据修复材料的类型,将样品分为三组(n=20):第一组:微杂化复合材料Filtek P90 Silorane,第二组:IPS emax Press,第三组:Vitadur Alpha瓷。根据使用的漂白剂类型(分别为Opalesence extra Boost 35%过氧化氢(HP)和Zoom 2 25% HP),将三组中的每一组分为两个亚组(n=10) (a和b)。亚组样本根据测试类型(粗糙度测试和颜色评估)进一步分为两等分(n=5)。每个样品在漂白前都要评估表面粗糙度和颜色变化,这样每个样品都可以作为自己的对照。采用环境扫描电镜(ESEM)检测表面粗糙度。用CIELAB色标分光光度计测色。每个亚组的一个样品在漂白前后用x射线衍射检查以确认其结晶相。结果进行统计学分析。结果:在未漂白和漂白的样品之间,以及用Opalesence extra Boost处理的亚组和用Zoom 2处理的亚组之间,Ra值有显著差异。两种漂白剂对修复材料颜色的影响有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,与Zoom 2相比,使用Opalesence extra Boost处理的修复材料的颜色变化明显更高,其平均值为ΔE值。结论:高浓度的办公室漂白系统对Filtek P90 Silorane、IPS e-max Press和Vitadur Alpha瓷的表面粗糙度和颜色有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology (2146-8397) Between (2012 Volume 1, Issue 1 - 2018 Volume 7, Issue 1). Journal of Complementary Medicine Research is aimed to serve a contemporary approach to the knowledge about world-wide usage of complementary medicine and their empirical and evidence-based effects. ISSN: 2577-5669
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信