Clinical and health economic benefits of out-patient lumbar microdiscectomies in Australia

A. Magee, I. Bhaskar, P. Ilett, M. Murphy, Yiyan Wang
{"title":"Clinical and health economic benefits of out-patient lumbar microdiscectomies in Australia","authors":"A. Magee, I. Bhaskar, P. Ilett, M. Murphy, Yiyan Wang","doi":"10.21307/ajon-2017-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction This study reports on the clinical, nursing and health outcomes on the out-patient lumbar microdiscectomy program at a single institution. A multi-disciplinary team approach to the pre- and post-operative planning and education is key to the success of this program. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for two patient groups (out-patient microdiscectomy and in-patient microdiscectomy) over a two-year period in a single institution was performed. Clinical, demographical, surgical and economic measures were collected including a 10-point visual analogue pain scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, direct and indirect costs of treatment. Patients included had a single level lumbar disc prolapse with persistent disabling sciatica of more than 8 weeks consistent with failure of conservative measures. Results Twenty-one out-patient and forty-one in-patient microdiscectomy patients were treated over this period. Post operatively pain levels showed a significant improvement in VAS levels from 5.2 ±2.9 to 1.6 ±0.8 and 0.7 ± 0.8 at day 1 and 7 post-operatively respectively. This was not different across both groups. Patient satisfaction was high in both surgical groups. There was a significant cost savings in out-patient lumbar micro-discectomy with the majority of savings coming from costs associated with staff (nursing, allied health and medical) funding. There was successful discharge 100% of out-patient microdiscectomy patients without readmission. Conclusion Outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy is a viable option in Australia. It demonstrates no difference in patient outcomes as compared to in-patient lumbar microdiscectomies and has high patient satisfaction outcomes. There are significant benefits in terms of health economics and nursing care in establishing an out-patient lumbar microdiscetomy program.","PeriodicalId":32533,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"18 1","pages":"15 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/ajon-2017-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This study reports on the clinical, nursing and health outcomes on the out-patient lumbar microdiscectomy program at a single institution. A multi-disciplinary team approach to the pre- and post-operative planning and education is key to the success of this program. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for two patient groups (out-patient microdiscectomy and in-patient microdiscectomy) over a two-year period in a single institution was performed. Clinical, demographical, surgical and economic measures were collected including a 10-point visual analogue pain scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, direct and indirect costs of treatment. Patients included had a single level lumbar disc prolapse with persistent disabling sciatica of more than 8 weeks consistent with failure of conservative measures. Results Twenty-one out-patient and forty-one in-patient microdiscectomy patients were treated over this period. Post operatively pain levels showed a significant improvement in VAS levels from 5.2 ±2.9 to 1.6 ±0.8 and 0.7 ± 0.8 at day 1 and 7 post-operatively respectively. This was not different across both groups. Patient satisfaction was high in both surgical groups. There was a significant cost savings in out-patient lumbar micro-discectomy with the majority of savings coming from costs associated with staff (nursing, allied health and medical) funding. There was successful discharge 100% of out-patient microdiscectomy patients without readmission. Conclusion Outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy is a viable option in Australia. It demonstrates no difference in patient outcomes as compared to in-patient lumbar microdiscectomies and has high patient satisfaction outcomes. There are significant benefits in terms of health economics and nursing care in establishing an out-patient lumbar microdiscetomy program.
澳大利亚门诊腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的临床和健康经济效益
摘要:本研究报告了一家机构门诊腰椎微椎间盘切除术的临床、护理和健康结果。一个多学科的团队对术前和术后计划和教育的方法是这个项目成功的关键。方法回顾性分析两组患者(门诊微椎间盘切除术和住院微椎间盘切除术)在两年内的前瞻性数据。收集临床、人口学、手术和经济指标,包括10分视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、患者满意度、直接和间接治疗费用。纳入的患者有单节段腰椎间盘突出伴持续失能性坐骨神经痛超过8周,与保守措施失败一致。结果门诊21例,住院41例。术后疼痛评分VAS评分从术后第1天和第7天分别由5.2±2.9分改善至1.6±0.8分和0.7±0.8分。这在两组中并没有什么不同。两组患者满意度均较高。门诊腰椎微型椎间盘切除术节省了大量费用,其中大部分节省来自与工作人员(护理、联合保健和医疗)供资有关的费用。显微椎间盘切除术患者100%顺利出院,无再入院。结论门诊腰椎微椎间盘切除术在澳大利亚是一种可行的选择。与住院腰椎显微椎间盘切除术相比,患者的预后无差异,患者满意度高。在健康经济学和护理方面,建立一个门诊腰椎显微切除术项目有显著的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书