Degree of crystallinity of dealuminated offretites determined by X-ray diffraction and by a new method based on nitrogen adsorption

A.P. Carvalho, M. Brotas de Carvalho, J. Pires
{"title":"Degree of crystallinity of dealuminated offretites determined by X-ray diffraction and by a new method based on nitrogen adsorption","authors":"A.P. Carvalho,&nbsp;M. Brotas de Carvalho,&nbsp;J. Pires","doi":"10.1016/S0144-2449(97)00101-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Samples obtained from thermal dealumination (in the presence and absence of water vapour) of three offretite zeolites with, respectively, 4.4, 3.4, and 2.9 aluminium atoms per unit cell, were investigated by i.r. spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction, and nitrogen adsorption. The <em>percentage of crystallinity</em> was then evaluated by two different methods: the standard XRD technique and a new method based on nitrogen adsorption data analysed through the <em>α</em><sub>s</sub>-method. In this case the volume of the ultramicropores (width less than 0.7 nm) was considered. Differences between the two estimates, as well as the loss of crystallinity during dealumination, which is expressed by the representation of both crystallinity evaluations, C<sub>XRD</sub> or C<sub>ADS</sub>, versus ν<sub>1</sub> (the frequency of the stretching asymmetric T-O band), were analysed for self-steamed and steamed samples. The results obtained agree within 20%, and often better. For self-steamed samples the crystallinity evaluated from XRD patterns is always smaller than that estimated from adsorption data, whereas for steamed samples the opposite situation is generally observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23983,"journal":{"name":"Zeolites","volume":"19 5","pages":"Pages 382-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0144-2449(97)00101-2","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeolites","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144244997001012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Samples obtained from thermal dealumination (in the presence and absence of water vapour) of three offretite zeolites with, respectively, 4.4, 3.4, and 2.9 aluminium atoms per unit cell, were investigated by i.r. spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction, and nitrogen adsorption. The percentage of crystallinity was then evaluated by two different methods: the standard XRD technique and a new method based on nitrogen adsorption data analysed through the αs-method. In this case the volume of the ultramicropores (width less than 0.7 nm) was considered. Differences between the two estimates, as well as the loss of crystallinity during dealumination, which is expressed by the representation of both crystallinity evaluations, CXRD or CADS, versus ν1 (the frequency of the stretching asymmetric T-O band), were analysed for self-steamed and steamed samples. The results obtained agree within 20%, and often better. For self-steamed samples the crystallinity evaluated from XRD patterns is always smaller than that estimated from adsorption data, whereas for steamed samples the opposite situation is generally observed.

用x射线衍射和氮吸附新方法测定脱铝铝石的结晶度
通过热脱铝(存在和不存在水蒸气)获得的三种offrete沸石样品,分别为4.4,3.4和2.9铝原子每单元电池,通过红外光谱进行了研究。x射线衍射和氮吸附。然后用两种不同的方法来评估结晶率:标准的XRD技术和基于αs法分析氮吸附数据的新方法。在这种情况下,考虑了超微孔(宽度小于0.7 nm)的体积。两种估计之间的差异,以及脱铝过程中结晶度的损失,这是由结晶度评估的表示,CXRD或CADS,相对于ν1(拉伸不对称T-O波段的频率),对自蒸和蒸样品进行了分析。所获得的结果在20%以内一致,而且往往更好。对于自蒸样品,通过XRD谱图评价的结晶度总是小于通过吸附数据估计的结晶度,而对于蒸样品,通常观察到相反的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信